The ICO-market is growing rapidly. So, too, is the number of that provide information about it. Many of these crypto-media offer users the option of tracking . In addition, they post ratings, not only for the projects, but also for , in the field, , and other resources. resources ICO ratings ICO blockchain conferences advisors listings media So just who it is that compiles all these ratings? Perhaps more importantly, should we believe them? Let’s contemplate the question. Can you trust ratings? Various rating platforms offer investors a review of the ICO investing in its resources. Some have established a solid reputation along with a certain ‘prestige.’ Therefore crypto-investors are prone to believe them unconditionally. They then proceed to make choices based not only on ratings but also bearing in mind that there are unscrupulous ICO projects willing to get the highest possible rating using every possible means — and not all of those means are honest. ICO before Let’s face it: Some firms flat-out a high rating on the platform. That’s bad enough but even worse is that some of the large stand most renowned ICO listings offer this type of ‘promotion.’ buy One method of checking rating reliability: Become Somebody Else Here’s one straight forward method to get closer to the truth: Pretend to be an ICO representative. Send a letter to the ICO listing and ask what need to do to increase your rating. If this is one of the platforms that ratings, you won’t wait long for a reply. precisely you sells A second approach to acquiring reliable rating info: Research Don’t blindly trust ratings. Do your own research. It’s easy: Check out the various social networks connected to the ICO project, review media articles about the firm, and compare their ratings across different platforms. For instance, if on one listing you find a low rating and a highscam score, but another listing for the same project boasts 10/10, that’s a red flag, and you’d be wise to distrust that resource. Third review: Analytical Team is mandatory Every ICO-rating listing should have a team of solid, professional analysts. They should publish their rationale for rating a project, list which aspects they review when doing research, and clearly state how they go about evaluating the tokenomics of each ICO. their exactly We’ve done a bit of research ourselves.We asked various individuals if they take ratings into consideration. We also asked how they go about making decisions regarding which ideas are investment-worthy. Most crypto-enthusiasts report that they don’t rely solely on the ICO rating platforms — even though those platforms comprise a good portion of their research — but they’re also diligent when it comes to researching as many factors as possible before coming to their own conclusions. do Many investors believe that the best way to find a reliable ICO is via the . There they can ask questions of, and get answers from, professional crypto-investigators. Bitcointalk forum Conclusion Whether or not an investor chooses to believe an ICO rating platform is up to the individual. However, our recommendation is first to confirm that a particular ICO listing gives . Then, once you’ve confirmed credibility, take the time to gather as much research possible for the project you’re considering. ratings honest The bottom line is that, when it comes to investing, you do your own research and make very well-informed decisions relying on rating platforms. can without unreliable Today’s ICO market is enormous, deliberately -transparent, and sometimes downright tricky. non Check out a number of the most trusted ICO rating platforms here: , , https://icobench.com https://forico.io https://icoholder.com
