We’re often asked, ' How long do you think it will take to finish the project?’ As engineers, we like to build things.  Building things, seeing things work and getting things done excite us.  Engineers undervalue estimation as a skill. Poor estimates can be costly, feeding into poor business decisions.  So, how do we do estimates better? Here are some techniques to improve the estimation We treat an estimate as a “prediction that has a non-zero probability of coming true”. Remember we operate with imperfect information when we start the project. We should consider our estimates as probability spanning best and worst-case scenarios. So, instead of saying the feature will finish in 8 weeks, we say there’s an 80% chance of the project completing in 8 weeks, and a 20% chance project will finish in 10 weeks. Think of estimates as a probability distribution: : Anchoring bias occurs when people rely too much on first information or pre-existing information to make decisions. For e.g. if you see a T-shirt that costs $300, then see a second one that costs $100, you are prone to see a second T-shirt as cheap whereas if you’ve merely seen the second shirt priced at $100, you will not view it as cheap. The anchor - the first price that you saw unduly influenced your opinion.  A similar effect happens in the project. A manager may ask for a quick ballpark estimate. Avoid committing to a number without understanding the details, and tasks involved. A low estimate (usually an underestimate) can set an initial anchor that makes it hard to establish a more accurate estimate later on. Avoid anchoring bias :  When estimating a large project break it into small tasks, and estimate each one of them. Breaking the project into small tasks is a reflection of your understanding of what’s involved. The more granular a task’s breakdown, the less likely for a surprise later. Break the project into granular tasks People with different skill sets and levels of familiarity with the codebase. What takes one person to complete a task might take another person three hours to complete the same. As much as possible, have the person who will work on a task do the actual estimation.  An additional benefit of doing this enables more team members to practice estimation skills. Allow the person doing the task to make the estimates: If you know historically, you tend to underestimate by 25%, then you know it’s worthwhile to scale up your overall estimates by 25%. Using historical data to validate estimates improves accuracy. Validate estimates against historical data: : Estimation is hard. We have a tendency to overlook, and cut corners. By reviewing estimates as a team, we have others that may have knowledge or experience to challenge our assumption and highlight gaps or incomplete estimates. This helps increase accuracy. Review estimates as a team Project estimate is difficult to get right, and many of us have learned the hard way. The only way to get better is by practicing. Start with estimates on a smaller project where the cost of poor estimates is lower. By practicing on small projects, you can apply this skill on larger & high-risk projects. Good estimation skills lead to better planning, A better plan will determine whether a project’s targets are realistic enough.

This story contains new, firsthand information uncovered by the writer.

Too Long; Didn't Read

In your car, at home, or at work — Bosch technology shapes many areas of life.

Techniques to Improve Project Estimation

Too Long; Didn't Read

Krishnan

STORY’S CREDIBILITY

Original Reporting

About Author

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN...

Techniques to Improve Project Estimation

Too Long; Didn't Read

Krishnan

STORY’S CREDIBILITY

Original Reporting

About Author

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN...

RELATED STORIES