paint-brush
Standards of Qualityby@editingprotocol

Standards of Quality

by Editing ProtocolJune 19th, 2023
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story w/o Javascript
tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

So, we aren’t here to talk about whether or not something is art (although all your stories are a work of art, right?). We don’t want to reject things based on subjective ideas like “good” or “heartfelt”, because mistakes are more easily made when something is subjective. Thus, when we talk about quality in your writing or reject something for quality issues, we aren’t talking about our personal tastes. We’re talking about objective things your story does and doesn’t. When you are writing about how to implement hreflang link attribution in HTML, either the code works or it doesn’t. If you are writing a listicle about the “Best” Crypto Exchanges in 2023, either your rankings are based on objective facts, or they aren’t. Your technical guide either gives the reader actionable, in-depth information, or it doesn’t. These are the things we’re talking about when we talk about Standards of Quality. It isn’t about personal taste, but instead fundamental practices all writers should follow.
featured image - Standards of Quality
Editing Protocol HackerNoon profile picture
Editing Protocol

Editing Protocol

@editingprotocol

L O A D I N G
. . . comments & more!

About Author

Editing Protocol HackerNoon profile picture
Editing Protocol@editingprotocol

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN...

Permanent on Arweave
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story in a terminal
 Terminal
Read this story w/o Javascript
Read this story w/o Javascript
 Lite