This is the third piece in my series about , which started with a focus on to then dive deeper into the landscape of Restaking EigenLayer Restaking Finance. Since then, we have seen the , such as and $ , which have attracted increasing attention. emergence of new players in the space Kelp DAO, Renzo, RSTK seems to be positioned to be one of the However, while many talk about how restaking works, and its benefits, Restaking main narratives driving 2024. it’s not all rosy. This article aims to take a step back and analyze at a higher level, highlighting risks and answering the question: is it really Restaking worth it? Let’s start with a quick intro to the subject. What Is Restaking? serves as a where participants commit their stake to secure the Ethereum network. Ethereum’s Proof of Stake (PoS) decentralized trust mechanism, Restaking is the idea that the same stake used to secure the Ethereum PoS can now be used to secure many other networks. Restaking can be interpreted as programmable staking, where users opt-in to any positive or negative incentives to secure other infrastructure. In practice, EigenLayer restakers supply (in the form of staked eth), so that economic trust anything objectively verifiable can be slashed. Would you, Eth staker, like to opt into additional slashing conditions on other chains? EigenLayer is “ ” the decentralized trust of Ethereum so that AVS services can leverage it without the effectively lowering the barriers to entry in this market. modularizing need to bootstrap their validator set, Typically, such modules require actively validated services that have their own distributed validation semantics to do verification. Usually, these actively validated services (“AVS”) are either secured by their own native token or are permissioned in nature. Why Would Anyone Do This? Simply put it, is because of economic incentives and yields. If Ethereum staking yields hover around 5% annually, restaking could offer an enticing additional yield. estimate of these rewards, as they will depend on demand and supply dynamics on the It’s not currently possible to provide an Eigen Marketplace. However, this translates into additional risks for stakers. Aside from the inherent risk of leveraging their staked ETH, when users opt-in to restake your tokens, they are essentially in case of errors, double signing, etc. on any of the AVS they secure. entrusting to the EigenLayer contracts the authority to slash their stake As such, as restakers could get slashed on ETH, on the restaking layer, or both. restaking adds a layer of risk, Is the extra yield worth ? restaking R(isk)-Staking For stakers, means that you can decide to opt-in to as many networks as you wish and boost your yields, hence, why EigenLayer refers to itself as “ restaking the Airbnb of decentralized trust.” It’s not all roses though.. as restaking adds some notable risks: ETH must be staked (or LSTs - hence not liquid) EigenLayer smart contract risk Protocol-specific Slashing conditions Liquidity risks Concentration risks De-facto, (due to staking), and adding additional risks on top of it, ending up with layered risks looking like: by restaking users are leveraging a token that is already exposed to risks Furthermore, any additional development of primitives on top of those would add even more complexity and additional risk. Aside from the individual risk of , the has also raised issues concerning Restaking, notably in the famous restakers Ethereum Developer community Vitalik article about not overloading Ethereum consensus. The issue with restaking is that it opens up new avenues of risk for staked Eth that secures the mainnet; it destines a part of it to secure other chains (as opted-in by stakers). Consequently, if they misbehave according to other protocol rules (which could have bugs or weak security), their deposit gets slashed. The debate is very actual with the devs and EigenLayer trying to find a way to coordinate efforts and make sure that Ethereum is not weakened by these technical advancements. Repurposing the most important “ ”, securing Ethereum, is indeed not an easy feat. layer Furthermore, a key aspect in this regard is the level of allowed for restakers. risk management Many Restaking projects give the However, as a I would want to personally vet and decide which AVS to restake to, to avoid being slashed by malicious networks and reduce the possibilities of new vectors of attack. whitelisting process for AVS into the hands of their DAOs. restaker, All in all, restaking is an interesting new primitive worth researching. Nonetheless, the concerns of Vitalik and others are not to be minimized. When talking about restaking, it’s important to bear in mind how this affects the security model of the Ethereum mainnet. It is, however, fair to contextualize restaking as offering an extra level of risk on top of one of the most important mechanisms securing Ethereum. In the end, whether restaking is worth it or not is an individual choice. Restaking Risks: Collusion risk: many operators could attack a set of AVS at the same time and compromise security. Slashing risk: users restaking are subject to slashing penalties from both ETH and AVS. Single point of failure: receives withdraw credentials from eth credentials (systemic risk for mainnet). Centralization risk for validators Adds additional risks to the stake-securing Ethereum Institutional Appeal Perhaps surprisingly, many institutions have signaled their interest in restaking as an additional reward on top of staked Eth. Nonetheless, they will probably carry out restaking through their custodians rather than joining any other service which might expose them to additional risks of slashing. Given the risk highlighted before, whether the highest interest for restaking will come from retail or institutions will be interesting. An additional yield on top of the native Eth staking is appealing for those already involved in it, but it’s not a life-changing yield for degens, given the risks. This opens up new use cases for Ethereum as a financial instrument. A particularly interesting comparison is made, comparing restaking applications to “ ” corporate bonds. New networks want to get L1 security, similar to how companies or nation-states use their financial systems to create bonds and secure their assets. In crypto, Ethereum is the widest and most liquid network, and probably the only one that could sustain this type of market — and the most secure from a similar point of view of nations states in the TradFi economy. Those interested in getting deeper into this can refer to: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-wVZzgMhhQ&ab_channel=EigenLayer&embedable=true For now, most interest in restaking seems to be driven by speculations on the EigenLayer airdrop, which might just be the biggest airdrop ever in the history of crypto. How will the dynamics change after the airdrop? Perhaps a practical r/r analysis might then push some to other avenues which might be more fruitful. I would go as far as to argue that a high % of capital deposited in restaking is mercenary capital, which might then leave post-airdrop. Separating the speculative component will be fundamental to assessing the real interest that users have in this new primitive. Personally, the narrative is a bit oversold IMHO, with very present risks that have to be evaluated carefully. restaking Key Takeaways Thanks to restaking, AVS have lower cost barriers to kick-start when they can leverage. Ethereum’s highly robust security layer. Users benefit from increased capital efficiency by having the option to restake their ETH, in turn receiving more staking rewards. Restaking adds additional risk on top of other risks. Restaking is an exciting primitive that can spur a novelty of use cases. While full development of the Eigen marketplace will take place in about a year, there are already a few interesting restaking experiments being explored. Some concerns raised by Vitalik are related to the centralization of staking power, at the expense of solo staking. It will be interesting to observe how EigenLayer will team up with the Ethereum Foundation to address those. But aside from those, other issues remain. What Can We Do to Mitigate These Risks? Some of the solutions to mitigate the risks of restaking involve the (TVL caps, slashing amounts, fee distribution, min TVL, etc.) as well as ensuring the optimization of the parameters of restaking diversification of the funds across AVSs. An immediate step that restaking protocols can take into consideration is to allow users to select different risk profiles when depositing for restaking. Ideally, each user should be able to assess and select which AVS to restake to, without having to delegate the process to a DAO. This needs to be the product of joint efforts across AVSs and EigenLayer, to make sure there is a roadmap in process to minimize those risks. The EigenLayer team is already working with the Ethereum Foundation on further alignment and making sure that restaking does not add system risks to Ethereum, Liquid Staking Tokens, or AVSs leveraging it. More on Restaking: https://twitter.com/ChainLinkGod/status/1736897325820457018 https://twitter.com/francescoweb3/status/1706238268898177139 https://twitter.com/francescoweb3/status/1708776352898527489 The author of this post is not associated with the projects mentioned in this article in any way. All of the content above is not financial advice, and you are always encouraged to do your own research. Also published here

Ethereum Is Making Itself Future Proof: What to Expect From the Ethereum Roadmap in 2024

Check my blog about cryptocurrency, politics, economics!

Read My Stories

Too Long; Didn't Read

CTA: Download the FREE AI Productivity Shift report

Restaking Risks: Is It a House of Cards?

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Untitled Story

The Top Winners and Losers of Crypto in 2023

06/02/2018: Biggest Stories in the Cryptosphere

06/09/2018: Biggest Stories in the Cryptosphere

05/02/2018: Biggest Stories in the Cryptosphere

0 to Pro Crypto Trader: Your Ultimate Guide to Bitcoin and Altcoin Investing

The Top Winners and Losers of Crypto in 2023

06/02/2018: Biggest Stories in the Cryptosphere

06/09/2018: Biggest Stories in the Cryptosphere

05/02/2018: Biggest Stories in the Cryptosphere

0 to Pro Crypto Trader: Your Ultimate Guide to Bitcoin and Altcoin Investing

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps