People always suggest Java, C++, Go or any other kind of language that are statically typed over Python for projects with large code base due to their statically typed nature. When the code grows or becomes old, no matter how much you apply clean code or readability principles, it becomes annoying and harder to understand when you’re going to modify or fix some bugs later, refactoring becomes risky, code review time increases and well, you might start develop a grudge against it. Modifying another lazy person code that doesn’t have any clue about clean code or documentation becomes insane, you might start developing the same grudge against humanity as well. Python is great for fast development, taking an idea from zero to production but having a dynamic type nature has its own disadvantages as well. Good news is, this is not true anymore. Python 3.6 + comes with checking now, you can check out PEP 526 and its previous PEPs regarding to type checking. Mypy type What is mypy? Mypy is an optional static type checker for Python. You can add type hints to your Python programs using the standard for type annotations introduced in Python 3.5 ( ), and use mypy to type check them statically. Find bugs in your programs without even running them! PEP 484 already supports type hinting and even type annotation syntax, we have project written in Python 3.5 on production with the code base fully written with these new feature, the code has amazing readabilities. PyCharm “It has made the code review and maintenance much much easier.” When I say large code base, I’m mostly talking about projects with at least +100k lines. Right now I’m working with multiple projects, each with at least around ~250k lines of code, and they’re growing in matter of code base. I’m not saying it’s impossible, but it’s harder when types are not mentioned and hints are not there. When I review code, I constantly find myself reading through the function body only to find out the arguments types and the return type of the function. It’s like constantly running the code in my brain to get a clear understanding of it. I write DocString a lot, Sphinx style or Python style or any other kind of way to let my development tools such as PyCharm to understand the types. For instance, do you know this method takes and return ? fib def fib(n):a, b = 0, 1while a < n:yield aa, b = b, a+b I’m sure you know, since you just read the body of function to figure that out, but with new features you don’t need to do that anymore: def fib(n: int) -> Iterator[int]:a, b = 0, 1while a < n:yield aa, b = b, a+b So much better and cleaner. This is a very simple example to show case the problem and how it can be solved. You can’t bring up this excuse anymore, to say Python is for small sized projects”, just because of dynamic typing nature. Some PEPs to read: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0526/ https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0484/ https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3107/ is how hackers start their afternoons. We’re a part of the family. We are now and happy to opportunities. Hacker Noon @AMI accepting submissions discuss advertising &sponsorship To learn more, , , or simply, read our about page like/message us on Facebook tweet/DM @HackerNoon. If you enjoyed this story, we recommend reading our and . Until next time, don’t take the realities of the world for granted! latest tech stories trending tech stories
![featured image - Python[3] is great for projects with large code base](https://hackernoon.imgix.net/fallback-feat.png?auto=format&fit=max&w=2048)
