This story draft by @legalpdf has not been reviewed by an editor, YET.
The New York Times Company v. Microsoft Corporation Court Filing December 27, 2023 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This is part 22 of 27.
178. The Times incorporates by reference and realleges the preceding allegations as though fully set forth herein.
179. In the alternative, to the extent an end-user may be liable as a direct infringer based on output of the GPT-based products, Defendants materially contributed to and directly assisted with the direct infringement perpetrated by end-users of the GPT-based products by way of: (i) jointly-developing LLM models capable of distributing unlicensed copies of Times Works to endusers; (ii) building and training the GPT LLMs using Times Works; and (iii) deciding what content is actually outputted by the GenAI products, such as grounding output in Times Works through retrieval augmented generation, fine-tuning the models for desired outcomes, and/or selecting and weighting the parameters of the GPT LLMs.
180. Defendants knew or had reason to know of the direct infringement by end-users because Defendants undertake extensive efforts in developing, testing, and troubleshooting their LLM models and GPT-based products. Defendants are fully aware that their GPT-based products are capable of distributing unlicensed copies or derivatives of copyrighted Times Works.
Continue Reading Here.
About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.
This court case 1:23-cv-11195 retrieved on December 29, 2023, from nycto-assets.nytimes.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.