paint-brush
Theory Coherent Shrinkage of Time Varying Parameters in VARs: Conclusion and Referencesby@keynesian

Theory Coherent Shrinkage of Time Varying Parameters in VARs: Conclusion and References

by Keynesian TechnologySeptember 4th, 2024
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story w/o Javascript
tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

TVP-VAR are flexible statistical models used both for prediction and policy analysis in macroeconomics. Despite their flexibility, these models can easily become too flexible with the risk of over fitting the data. This paper exploits the restrictions implied by economic theory to formulate a prior for the parameters of TVP- VARs so as to enhance inference within this class of models.
featured image - Theory Coherent Shrinkage of Time Varying Parameters in VARs: Conclusion and References
Keynesian Technology HackerNoon profile picture

Andrea Renzetti, Department of Economics, Alma Mater Studiorium Universit`a di Bologna, Piazza Scaravilli 2, 40126 Bologna, Italy.

Abstract and Introduction

Theory coherent TVP-VAR

Forecasting with the TC-TVP-VAR

Response analysis at the ZLB with the TC-TVP-VAR

Conclusion and References

A Appendix

5 Conclusion

TVP-VAR are flexible statistical models used both for prediction and policy analysis in macroeconomics. Despite their flexibility allows to capture changes in the dynamic relationship among the macroeconomic variables, these models can easily become too flexible with the risk of over fitting the data. This translate into poor forecasting performances and imprecise inference on the time-varying parameters and of typical objects of interests such as the impulse responses. On the other side, models from the economic theory typically provide a more tightly parameterized representation of the macroeconomy and therefore have the opposite tendency of fitting the data rather poorly. This paper exploits the restrictions implied by economic theory to formulate a prior for the parameters of TVP-VARs so as to enhance inference within this class of models. It does so by introducing a shrinkage prior that centers the time varying coefficients at each time period on the cross equation restrictions implied by an underlying economic theory about the variables in the system. The paper shows that “economic shrinkage” can be successfully used to obtain more accurate forecasts and more precise estimates of typical objects of interests such as the impulse responses.


Future research For future research the prior proposed in this paper could be modified to accommodate for multiple competing theories `a la Loria et al. (2022). As well, the model could be extended to embed stochastic volatility, adapting the algorithm in Bognanni (2018). More in general, restrictions from economic theory could successfully be used to reduce overfitting and sharpen inference in non-parametric VARs and Gaussian Procesess VARs (Hauzenberger et al. 2022).

References

Ascari, Guido, Paolo Bonomolo, and Qazi Haque. 2023. “The long-run phillips curve is... a curve.”


Ascari, Guido, and Argia M. Sbordone. 2014. “The Macroeconomics of Trend Inflation.” Journal of Economic Literature 52 (3): 679–739.


Belmonte, Miguel A.G., Gary Koop, and Dimitris Korobilis. 2014. “Hierarchical Shrinkage in Time-Varying Parameter Models.” Journal of Forecasting 33 (1): 80–94.


Benati, Luca, and Thomas A. Lubik. 2023. Impulse Response Analysis at the Zero Lower Bound. Diskussionsschriften dp2306. Universitaet Bern, Departement Volkswirtschaft, June.


Bitto, Angela, and Sylvia Fr¨uhwirth-Schnatter. 2019. “Achieving shrinkage in a time-varying parameter model framework.” Annals Issue in Honor of John Geweke “Complexity and Big Data in Economics and Finance: Recent Developments from a Bayesian Perspective”, Journal of Econometrics 210 (1): 75–97.


Bognanni, Mark. 2018. A Class of Time-Varying Parameter Structural VARs for Inference under Exact or Set Identification. Working Papers (Old Series) 1811. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.


Cagliarini, Adam, and Mariano Kulish. 2013. “Solving Linear Rational Expectations Models with Predictable Structural Changes.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 95, no. 1 (March): 328–336.


Carriero, Andrea, Todd E. Clark, and Massimiliano Marcellino. 2021. “No-arbitrage priors, drifting volatilities, and the term structure of interest rates.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 36 (5): 495–516.


Carter, C. K., and R. Kohn. 1994. “On Gibbs Sampling for State Space Models.” Biometrika 81 (3): 541–553.


Chan, Joshua C.C., Eric Eisenstat, and Rodney W. Strachan. 2020. “Reducing the state space dimension in a large TVP-VAR.” Journal of Econometrics 218 (1): 105–118.


Chan, Joshua CC, and Ivan Jeliazkov. 2009. “Efficient simulation and integrated likelihood estimation in state space models.” International Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Optimisation 1 (1-2): 101–120.


Chen, Han, Vasco C´urdia, and Andrea Ferrero. 2012. “The Macroeconomic Effects of Large-scale Asset Purchase Programmes*.” The Economic Journal 122 (564): F289–F315.


Cogley, Timothy, and Thomas Sargent. 2002. “Evolving Post-World War II US Inflation Dynamics.” In NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2001, Volume 16, 331–388. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.


Cogley, Timothy, and Thomas J. Sargent. 2005. “Drifts and volatilities: monetary policies and outcomes in the post WWII US.” Monetary Policy and Learning, Review of Economic Dynamics 8 (2): 262–302.


Cogley, Timothy, and Argia M. Sbordone. 2008. “Trend Inflation, Indexation, and Inflation Persistence in the New Keynesian Phillips Curve.” American Economic Review 98, no. 5 (December): 2101–26.


Coulombe, Philippe Goulet. 2021. Time-Varying Parameters as Ridge Regressions.


D’Agostino, Antonello, Luca Gambetti, and Domenico Giannone. 2013. “Macroeconomic forecasting and structural change.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 28 (1): 82–101.


Debortoli, Davide, Jordi Gal´ı, and Luca Gambetti. 2019. “On the Empirical (Ir)relevance of the Zero Lower Bound Constraint.” In NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2019, volume 34, 141–170. NBER Chapters. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, October.


Del Negro, Marco, Marc P. Giannoni, and Frank Schorfheide. 2015. “Inflation in the Great Recession and New Keynesian Models.” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 7, no. 1 (January): 168–96.


Del Negro, Marco, and Frank Schorfheide. 2004. “Priors from General Equilibrium Models for VARS*.” International Economic Review 45 (2): 643–673.


Farmer, Roger E.A., Daniel F. Waggoner, and Tao Zha. 2009. “Understanding Markov-switching rational expectations models.” Journal of Economic Theory 144 (5): 1849–1867.


Fessler, Pirmin, and Maximilian Kasy. 2019. “How to Use Economic Theory to Improve Estimators: Shrinking Toward Theoretical Restrictions.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 101, no. 4 (October): 681–698.


Fr¨uhwirth-Schnatter, Sylvia, and Helga Wagner. 2010. “Stochastic model specification search for Gaussian and partial non-Gaussian state space models.” Journal of Econometrics 154 (1): 85–100.


Gallant, A. Ronald, and Robert E. McCulloch. 2009. “On the Determination of General Scientific Models With Application to Asset Pricing.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 104 (485): 117–131.


Giacomini, Raffaella, and Giuseppe Ragusa. 2014. “Theory-coherent forecasting.” Causality, Prediction, and Specification Analysis: Recent Advances and Future Directions, Journal of Econometrics 182 (1): 145–155.


Giannone, Domenico, Michele Lenza, and Giorgio E. Primiceri. 2015. “Prior Selection for Vector Autoregressions.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 97, no. 2 (May): 436–451.


Hauzenberger, Niko, Florian Huber, Massimiliano Marcellino, and Nico Petz. 2022. Gaussian Process Vector Autoregressions and Macroeconomic Uncertainty.


Ingram, Beth F., and Charles H. Whiteman. 1994. “Supplanting the ’Minnesota’ prior: Forecasting macroeconomic time series using real business cycle model priors.” Journal of Monetary Economics 34, no. 3 (December): 497–510.


Kalli, Maria, and Jim E. Griffin. 2014. “Time-varying sparsity in dynamic regression models.” Journal of Econometrics 178 (2): 779–793.


Loria, Francesca, Christian Matthes, and Mu-Chun Wang. 2022. “Economic theories and macroeconomic reality.” Journal of Monetary Economics 126:105–117.


Milani, Fabio. 2007. “Expectations, learning and macroeconomic persistence.” Journal of Monetary Economics 54 (7): 2065–2082.


Primiceri, Giorgio E. 2005. “Time varying structural vector autoregressions and monetary policy.” The Review of Economic Studies 72 (3): 821–852.


Sims, Christopher. 2002. “Solving Linear Rational Expectations Models.” Computational Economics 20 (1-2): 1–20.


Sims, Christopher A. 1980. “Macroeconomics and Reality.” Econometrica 48 (1): 1–48.


Smets, Frank, and Rafael Wouters. 2007. “Shocks and Frictions in US Business Cycles: A Bayesian DSGE Approach.” American Economic Review 97, no. 3 (June): 586–606.


Smith Jr., A. A. 1993. “Estimating nonlinear time-series models using simulated vector autoregressions.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 8 (S1): S63–S84.


Stevanovic, Dalibor. 2016. “Common time variation of parameters in reduced-form macroeconomic models.” Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics 20, no. 2 (April): 159– 183.


Stock, James H., and Mark W. Watson. 2001. “Vector Autoregressions.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 15, no. 4 (December): 101–115.


Wind, Joris de, and Luca Gambetti. 2014. Reduced-rank time-varying vector autoregressions. CPB Discussion Paper 270. CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, March.


Woodford, Michael. 2003. Interest and Prices: Foundations of a Theory of Monetary Policy. Princeton University Press.


This paper is available on arxiv under CC 4.0 license.