Twitter v. Elon Musk Court Filing by Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, July 12, 2022 is part of . You can jump to any part in this filing . This is part 16 of 31. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here Feature Image: HackerNoon’s Midjourney AI, Prompt “CEO trying to exit” FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS VI. Musk grasps for an out 63. Musk wanted an escape. But the merger agreement left him little room. With no financing contingency or diligence condition, the agreement gave Musk no out absent a Company Material Adverse Effect or a material covenant breach by Twitter. Musk had to try to conjure one of those. Continue reading here