paint-brush
SEC Files Allegations Against BAM Trading for Unregistered Staking Programby@secagainsttheworld

SEC Files Allegations Against BAM Trading for Unregistered Staking Program

by SEC vs. the WorldSeptember 27th, 2023
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story w/o Javascript
tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

BAM Trading faces a fourth claim by the SEC, accused of offering and selling its Staking program without a required registration statement. The SEC asserts that this conduct violates Securities Act Sections 5(a) and 5(c). Read on to learn more about this legal action and its implications.

People Mentioned

Mention Thumbnail
featured image - SEC Files Allegations Against BAM Trading for Unregistered Staking Program
SEC vs. the World HackerNoon profile picture

SEC v. Binance Court Filing, retrieved on June 5, 2023 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This is part 58 of 69.

FACTS

IX. BINANCE AND BAM TRADING WERE REQUIRED TO BUT DID NOT REGISTER AS AN EXCHANGE, BROKER-DEALER, OR CLEARING AGENCY.


FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

Violations of Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act

(Against BAM Trading for the Unregistered Offer and Sale of its Staking Program)


523. The Commission realleges and incorporates by reference herein the allegations in Paragraphs 1-35, 80-238, 282-363, and 510-513.


524. At all relevant times, by engaging in the conduct alleged in the Complaint, specifically by offering and selling its Staking program without a registration statement filed or in effect as to that security, BAM Trading, directly and indirectly, made use of the means and instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or of the mails to sell securities through the use or medium of any prospectus or otherwise, carried or caused to be carried through the mails or in interstate commerce, by any means or instruments of transportation, that security for the purpose of sale or for delivery after sale, and/or made use of the means and instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or of the mails to offer to sell or offer to buy through the use or medium of a prospectus or otherwise of that security.


525. By reason of the conduct described above, BAM Trading violated, is violating, and, unless enjoined, will continue to violate Securities Act Sections 5(a) and 5(c) [15 U.S.C. §§ 77e(a), (c)].



Continue Reading Here.


About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.


This court case 1:23-cv-01599 retrieved on September 6, 2023, from docdroid.net is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.