US v. Bankman-Fried, 22-cr-673 Court Filing, Dec 13 2022 is part of . You can jump to any part in this filing . This is part 3 of 9. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud on Lenders COUNT THREE: The Grand Jury further charges: From at least in or about June 2022, up to and including in or about November 2022, in the Southern District of New York, and elsewhere, SAMUEL BANKMAN-FRIED, a/k/a "SBF," the defendant, and others known and unknown, willfully and knowingly did combine, conspire, confederate, and agree together and with each other to commit wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1343. It was a part and object of the conspiracy that SAMUEL BANKMAN-FRIED, a/k/a "SBF," the defendant, and others known and unknown, knowingly having devised and intending to devise a scheme and artifice to defraud, and for obtaining money and property by means of false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises, would and did transmit and cause to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, and television communication in interstate and foreign commerce, writings, signs, signals, pictures, and sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme and artifice, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343, to wit, BANKMAN-FRIED agreed with others to defraud lenders to Alameda Research, BANKMAN-FRIED's proprietary crypto hedge fund, by providing false and misleading information to those lenders regarding Alameda Research's financial condition. (Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349.) Continue Reading Here About We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: This court case (US v. Bankman-Fried, 22-cr-673 (Abrams), on Dec 15 2022) is part of the public domain. The court-created documents provided by PACER are works of the federal government, and under , are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. retrieved copyright law

SBF et al 'engaged in a scheme' to defraud Alameda lenders, per criminal charges 

Per Grand Jury, SBF *knowingly* misappropriates FTX customers' deposits to fund Alameda

Too Long; Didn't Read

Make resilience your competitive advantage

SBF knowingly 'devised a scheme' to defraud Alameda investors, per Grand Jury Indictment

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Untitled Story

Judge Rules Anthropic’s Use of Books for AI Training Was Legal, but Pirated Copies Raise Liability

4 silos, 103 subsidiaries, 13 entities in-debt: That is the Corporate Structure of FTX

According to SBF, Binance CEO CZ caused the bank run & never intended to acquire FTX

Alameda Loaned 1 Billion to Sam Bankman-Fried and 2.3 Billion to 'Paper Bird Inc' (aka SBF also)

At SBF's direction, Caroline materially misled investors that Alameda was fine. It was not.

Judge Rules Anthropic’s Use of Books for AI Training Was Legal, but Pirated Copies Raise Liability

4 silos, 103 subsidiaries, 13 entities in-debt: That is the Corporate Structure of FTX

According to SBF, Binance CEO CZ caused the bank run & never intended to acquire FTX

Alameda Loaned 1 Billion to Sam Bankman-Fried and 2.3 Billion to 'Paper Bird Inc' (aka SBF also)

At SBF's direction, Caroline materially misled investors that Alameda was fine. It was not.

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps