paint-brush
Musk publicly claimed Twitter's SEC filings inaccurate, while unable to provide evidence in courtby@legalpdf
305 reads
305 reads

Musk publicly claimed Twitter's SEC filings inaccurate, while unable to provide evidence in court

by Legal PDFNovember 25th, 2022
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story w/o Javascript

Too Long; Didn't Read

Twitter v. Elon Musk Court Filing July 12, 2022 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. Part 25 of 31: .FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS- Defendants purport to terminate the merger agreement - Twitter’s representations in its SEC filings supply no basis for termination
featured image - Musk publicly claimed Twitter's SEC filings inaccurate, while unable to provide evidence in court
Legal PDF HackerNoon profile picture

Twitter v. Elon Musk Court Filing by Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, July 12, 2022 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This is part 25 of 31.


FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

VIII. Defendants purport to terminate the merger agreement

B. Twitter’s representations in its SEC filings supply no basis for termination


131. Nor can defendants show that Twitter has made any representation or collection of representations the inaccuracy of which is “reasonably likely to result in” a Company Material Adverse Effect. They do not even try. Notwithstanding that defendants have received mountains of information regarding Twitter’s processes, far beyond what they are entitled to under the merger agreement, their termination notice asserts only that “[p]reliminary analysis by Mr. Musk’s advisors” of the vast data set Twitter provided to Musk after signing “causes Mr. Musk to strongly believe” Twitter’s reported estimates have been inaccurate. Ex. 3 at 6. Musk’s claimed “belie[f]” is of course no proof of misrepresentation, much less of a Company Material Adverse Effect — which can be established only by clearing an extraordinarily high bar that is nowhere in sight here.



Continue reading here