This story draft by @escholar has not been reviewed by an editor, YET.

Anatomy of a Stablecoin's failure: the Terra-Luna case: Future lines of research

EScholar: Electronic Academic Papers for Scholars HackerNoon profile picture
0-item

Table of Links

Abstract and 1. Introduction

2. Data and quantitative nature of the events

2.1. Hourly data analysis

2.2. Transaction data analysis

2.3. Anchor protocol

3. Methodology

3.1. Network analysis: Triangulated Maximally Filtered Graph (TMFG)

3.2. Herding analysis

4. Results

4.1. Correlations and network analysis

4.2. Herding analysis: CSAD approach

5. Robustness analysis

6. Implications and future research

6.1. Relevance for stakeholders

6.2. Future lines of research

7. Conclusion, Acknowledgements, and References

Supplementary Material

6.2. Future lines of research

Most of the existing literature on stablecoins concerns their stability (Grobys et al., 2021), their role in portfolio diversification (Wang et al., 2020; Baur and Hoang, 2021), and crypto asset price formation (Barucci et al., 2022; Kristoufek, 2022). Due to the nascent interest in this research field and the rapid growth of decentralised finance, gaps in the literature still exist. Recent events around Terra project highlights the need to analyse specific topics that have been neglected until now: (i) stablecoins as a means of exchange, (ii) stablecoins’ role within the crypto space, (iii) regulation on stablecoins and related protocols and (iv) potential risk to financial stability. First, stablecoins could not be appropriate as a mean of exchange due to their vulnerability to “bank runs” and high transaction costs compared to non-blockchain alternatives (Mizrach, 2022). Second, the role of stablecoins as “bridge” in the crypto space could be considered a double-edged sword since they could jeopardise the system’s stability once becoming systemic. Third, the dependence of UST on Anchor protocol remarks the need for better scrutiny of third party protocols related to any stablecoin. Finally, it would be necessary to consider scenarios in which specific fragilities within the stablecoins’ ecosystem may give rise to systemic financial stability risks.


Authors:

(1) Antonio Briola, Department of Computer Science, University College London, Gower Street, WC1E 6EA - London, United Kingdom and UCL Centre for Blockchain Technologies, London, United Kingdom;

(2) David Vidal-Tomas (Corresponding author), Department of Computer Science, University College London, Gower Street, WC1E 6EA - London, United Kingdom, Department of Economics, Universitat Jaume I, Campus del Riu Sec, 12071 - Castellon, Spain and UCL Centre for Blockchain Technologies, London, United Kingdom ([email protected]);

(3) Yuanrong Wang, Department of Computer Science, University College London, Gower Street, WC1E 6EA - London, United Kingdom and UCL Centre for Blockchain Technologies, London, United Kingdom;

(4) Tomaso Aste, Department of Computer Science, University College London, Gower Street, WC1E 6EA - London, United Kingdom, Systemic Risk Centre, London School of Economics, London, United Kingdom, and UCL Centre for Blockchain Technologies, London, United Kingdom.


This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED license.


L O A D I N G
. . . comments & more!

About Author

EScholar: Electronic Academic Papers for Scholars HackerNoon profile picture
EScholar: Electronic Academic Papers for Scholars@escholar
We publish the best academic work (that's too often lost to peer reviews & the TA's desk) to the global tech community

Topics

Around The Web...

Trending Topics

blockchaincryptocurrencyhackernoon-top-storyprogrammingsoftware-developmenttechnologystartuphackernoon-booksBitcoinbooks