Physical Properties of the Eclipsing Binary KIC 9851944: Asteroseismic Analysisby@escholar

Physical Properties of the Eclipsing Binary KIC 9851944: Asteroseismic Analysis

tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

Stars that are both pulsating and eclipsing offer an important opportunity to better understand many of the physical phenomena that occur in stars.
featured image - Physical Properties of the Eclipsing Binary KIC 9851944: Asteroseismic Analysis
EScholar: Electronic Academic Papers for Scholars HackerNoon profile picture

This paper is available on arxiv under CC 4.0 license.


(1) Z. Jennings, Astrophysics Group, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK (E-mail: [email protected]);

(2) J. Southworth, Astrophysics Group, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK;

(3) K. Pavlovski, Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia;

(4) T. Van Reeth, Institute of Astronomy, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200D, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium.


8.1 Frequency analysis

Following the binary modelling, we continue with the asteroseismic analysis of the target. Because the observed pulsations have much smaller amplitudes than the binary signal, the quality of the TESS and WASP data are insufficient for the asteroseismic analysis, and we limit ourselves to using the residual Kepler light curve. This is the merged light curve of all available Kepler short-cadence data after subtracting the best-fitting binary model, hereafter referred to as the pulsation light curve. To minimize the impact of outliers and instrumental effects on the asteroseismic analysis of small-amplitude pulsations, we apply additional processing to the data. Firstly, we remove those parts where coronal mass ejections (CMEs) or thermal and pointing changes of the spacecraft, such as at the start of a quarter or after a safe-mode event, have a visible impact on the quality of the light curve. Secondly, we apply preliminary iterative pre-whitening (as described by, e.g., Van Reeth et al. 2023) to build a tentative mathematical model of the 20 most dominant pulsations using a sum of sine waves

Figure 10. Lomb-Scargle periodogram of the short-cadence Kepler light curve of KIC 9851944 (black) with the iteratively prewhitened frequencies (full red lines).

8.2 Tidal perturbation analysis

8.3 Orbital harmonic frequencies

As pointed out by Guo et al. (2016), the detection of an orbital harmonic frequency comb is somewhat unexpected for synchronised binaries with circular orbits, though it has also been detected for other such systems (da Silva et al. 2014). Because the orbital eccentricity of the binary is zero, the equilibrium tides that are responsible for deforming the star and perturbing the pulsations are considerably larger than the dynamical tides that excite oscillations. Hence, this can indicate that this system has a slightly eccentric orbit or that one or both of the components is asynchronously rotating, within the uncertainty margins of our measurements.

8.4 Gravity-mode period-spacing pattern

Figure 13. Tidally excited oscillations in KIC 9851944. Left: Associated frequency multiplet, as shown in Fig. 11. The white star marks the dominant frequency of the multiplet. Top right: Orbital-phase folded light curve. Bottom right: Orbital-phase folded residuals of the light curve after subtraction of the binary model. Individual data points are shown in black. The overplotted purple line shows the average variability as a function of orbital phase, evaluated in 50 equal bins.

Figure 14. Detected period-spacing pattern of g modes with (k,m) = (0,2) that belong to the primary component of KIC 9851944. Top: part of the Lomb-Scargle periodogram of the pulsation light curve (black) with the pulsation periods of the modes that form the pattern (red dashed lines). Bottom: the period spacing between consecutive modes in the detected pattern, as a function of the pulsation period. Because there is an undetected mode between the fourth and fifth detected pulsation modes, the fourth period spacing in the pattern is not shown.

The error margins are smaller than the symbol sizes.