Authors:
(1) Diwen Xue, University of Michigan;
(2) Reethika Ramesh, University of Michigan;
(3) Arham Jain, University of Michigan;
(4) Arham Jain, Merit Network, Inc.;
(5) J. Alex Halderman, University of Michigan;
(6) Jedidiah R. Crandall, Arizona State University/Breakpointing Bad;
(7) Roya Ensaf, University of Michigan. Table of Links Abstract and 1 Introduction 2 Background & Related Work 3 Challenges in Real-world VPN Detection 4 Adversary Model and Deployment 5 Ethics, Privacy, and Responsible Disclosure 6 Identifying Fingerprintable Features and 6.1 Opcode-based Fingerprinting 6.2 ACK-based Fingerprinting 6.3 Active Server Fingerprinting 6.4 Constructing Filters and Probers 7 Fine-tuning for Deployment and 7.1 ACK Fingerprint Thresholds 7.2 Choice of Observation Window N 7.3 Effects of Packet Loss 7.4 Server Churn for Asynchronous Probing 7.5 Probe UDP and Obfuscated OpenVPN Servers 8 Real-world Deployment Setup 9 Evaluation & Findings and 9.1 Results for control VPN flows 9.2 Results for all flows 10 Discussion and Mitigations 11 Conclusion 12 Acknowledgement and References Appendix 7.2 Choice of Observation Window N Previous works attempt to identify VPN traffic only after the flow terminates, making use of aggregated statistics such as connection duration [17, 24, 26]. However, detecting disallowed traffic only after the flow is finished may be of limited interest to a real-world censor [4]. We therefore have two objectives for our Filter: to reduce probing targets by being as selective as possible, and to detect OpenVPN as soon as possible within a flow. Inspired by [4, 67], we consider the windowing strategy of limiting the inspection to only the first N data packets of a flow. We tested N from [10, 20, 30, ..... 200] on the ISP and VPN Dataset. As shown in Figure 8 (a), the number of ISP flows that are flagged by the Filter declines from over 62,000 to 322 as we increase the observation window. However, we note that a window size of 100 packets has already achieved a precision within 2% of the best performing (200 packets). Detection Speed and Potential Impact on Blocking A smaller window size can sever a connection at an earlier stage, thereby reducing transfer of data to a censored endpoint, while a more conservative windowing strategy excels at accuracy. In our deployment, we use 100 packets as the window size to balance detection speed and accuracy. To put this choice into perspective, we note that the Great Firewall of China (GFW) was previously observed to send confirmation probes to suspected endpoints in 15-minute intervals, and it has only recently moved to near real-time operation [11]. Recent work on how it detects Shadowsocks shows the median delay between the beginning of a connection and probing is about a minute, with probes being replayed for up to 47 times for confirmation [1]. In comparison, our deployment with a window size of 100 packets gives a median time of 7.9 seconds for the filter to flag an OpenVPN connection. We believe even with this delay, our system is still useful for censors who are interested in blocking OpenVPN connections. In addition, we note that a motivated adversary can further optimize this delay and speed the detection by tuning window size and probing rate, but with some potential loss of accuracy. This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY 4.0 DEED license. Authors: (1) Diwen Xue, University of Michigan; (2) Reethika Ramesh, University of Michigan; (3) Arham Jain, University of Michigan; (4) Arham Jain, Merit Network, Inc.; (5) J. Alex Halderman, University of Michigan; (6) Jedidiah R. Crandall, Arizona State University/Breakpointing Bad; (7) Roya Ensaf, University of Michigan. Authors: Authors: (1) Diwen Xue, University of Michigan; (2) Reethika Ramesh, University of Michigan; (3) Arham Jain, University of Michigan; (4) Arham Jain, Merit Network, Inc.; (5) J. Alex Halderman, University of Michigan; (6) Jedidiah R. Crandall, Arizona State University/Breakpointing Bad; (7) Roya Ensaf, University of Michigan. Table of Links Abstract and 1 Introduction Abstract and 1 Introduction 2 Background & Related Work 2 Background & Related Work 3 Challenges in Real-world VPN Detection 3 Challenges in Real-world VPN Detection 4 Adversary Model and Deployment 4 Adversary Model and Deployment 5 Ethics, Privacy, and Responsible Disclosure 5 Ethics, Privacy, and Responsible Disclosure 6 Identifying Fingerprintable Features and 6.1 Opcode-based Fingerprinting 6 Identifying Fingerprintable Features and 6.1 Opcode-based Fingerprinting 6.2 ACK-based Fingerprinting 6.2 ACK-based Fingerprinting 6.3 Active Server Fingerprinting 6.3 Active Server Fingerprinting 6.4 Constructing Filters and Probers 6.4 Constructing Filters and Probers 7 Fine-tuning for Deployment and 7.1 ACK Fingerprint Thresholds 7 Fine-tuning for Deployment and 7.1 ACK Fingerprint Thresholds 7.2 Choice of Observation Window N 7.2 Choice of Observation Window N 7.3 Effects of Packet Loss 7.3 Effects of Packet Loss 7.4 Server Churn for Asynchronous Probing 7.4 Server Churn for Asynchronous Probing 7.5 Probe UDP and Obfuscated OpenVPN Servers 7.5 Probe UDP and Obfuscated OpenVPN Servers 8 Real-world Deployment Setup 8 Real-world Deployment Setup 9 Evaluation & Findings and 9.1 Results for control VPN flows 9 Evaluation & Findings and 9.1 Results for control VPN flows 9.2 Results for all flows 9.2 Results for all flows 10 Discussion and Mitigations 10 Discussion and Mitigations 11 Conclusion 11 Conclusion 12 Acknowledgement and References 12 Acknowledgement and References Appendix Appendix 7.2 Choice of Observation Window N Previous works attempt to identify VPN traffic only after the flow terminates, making use of aggregated statistics such as connection duration [17, 24, 26]. However, detecting disallowed traffic only after the flow is finished may be of limited interest to a real-world censor [4]. We therefore have two objectives for our Filter: to reduce probing targets by being as selective as possible, and to detect OpenVPN as soon as possible within a flow. Inspired by [4, 67], we consider the windowing strategy of limiting the inspection to only the first N data packets of a flow. We tested N from [10, 20, 30, ..... 200] on the ISP and VPN Dataset. As shown in Figure 8 (a), the number of ISP flows that are flagged by the Filter declines from over 62,000 to 322 as we increase the observation window. However, we note that a window size of 100 packets has already achieved a precision within 2% of the best performing (200 packets). Detection Speed and Potential Impact on Blocking A smaller window size can sever a connection at an earlier stage, thereby reducing transfer of data to a censored endpoint, while a more conservative windowing strategy excels at accuracy. In our deployment, we use 100 packets as the window size to balance detection speed and accuracy. To put this choice into perspective, we note that the Great Firewall of China (GFW) was previously observed to send confirmation probes to suspected endpoints in 15-minute intervals, and it has only recently moved to near real-time operation [11]. Recent work on how it detects Shadowsocks shows the median delay between the beginning of a connection and probing is about a minute, with probes being replayed for up to 47 times for confirmation [1]. In comparison, our deployment with a window size of 100 packets gives a median time of 7.9 seconds for the filter to flag an OpenVPN connection. We believe even with this delay, our system is still useful for censors who are interested in blocking OpenVPN connections. In addition, we note that a motivated adversary can further optimize this delay and speed the detection by tuning window size and probing rate, but with some potential loss of accuracy. Detection Speed and Potential Impact on Blocking This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY 4.0 DEED license. This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY 4.0 DEED license. available on arxiv

Part of HackerNoon's growing list of open-source research papers, promoting free access to academic material.

Impact of Packet Loss on OpenVPN Detection Accuracy and Censoring

Fine-Tuning OpenVPN Detection: ACK Thresholds and Performance Metrics

VirtualMachine.Tech

Too Long; Didn't Read

Boost your HackerNoon story @ $159.99! 🚀

Optimizing OpenVPN Detection: Balancing Speed and Accuracy with Window Size

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Untitled Story

Active Probing: How OpenVPN Servers Are Fingerprinted Through Unique Behaviors

Automating User Management in the Company

How The Quarantine Affected Cybersecurity: New Challenges And Solutions

Installing Shadowsocks-rust: a Secure, Open-source Proxy Server, Better Than VPN

Introduction: What Is a VPN?

Active Probing: How OpenVPN Servers Are Fingerprinted Through Unique Behaviors

Automating User Management in the Company

How The Quarantine Affected Cybersecurity: New Challenges And Solutions

Installing Shadowsocks-rust: a Secure, Open-source Proxy Server, Better Than VPN

Introduction: What Is a VPN?

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps