Authors:
(1) Sebastian Dziadzio, University of Tübingen (sebastian.dziadzio@uni-tuebingen.de);
(2) Çagatay Yıldız, University of Tübingen;
(3) Gido M. van de Ven, KU Leuven;
(4) Tomasz Trzcinski, IDEAS NCBR, Warsaw University of Technology, Tooploox;
(5) Tinne Tuytelaars, KU Leuven;
(6) Matthias Bethge, University of Tübingen. Table of Links Abstract and 1. Introduction 2. Two problems with the current approach to class-incremental continual learning 3. Methods and 3.1. Infinite dSprites 3.2. Disentangled learning 4. Related work 4.1. Continual learning and 4.2. Benchmarking continual learning 5. Experiments 5.1. Regularization methods and 5.2. Replay-based methods 5.3. Do we need equivariance? 5.4. One-shot generalization and 5.5. Open-set classification 5.6. Online vs. offline Conclusion, Acknowledgments and References Supplementary Material 5.4. One-shot generalization To evaluate whether the learned regression network can generalize to unseen classes, we perform a one-shot learning experiment. Here, the model had to normalize and classify transformed versions of shapes it had not previously encountered. Since the returned class label depends on the exemplars in the buffer, we consider two variants of the experiment, corresponding to generalized and standard one-shot learning. In the first one, we keep the training exemplars in the buffer and add new ones. In the second, the buffer is cleared before including novel exemplars. We also introduce different numbers of test classes. The classification accuracies are presented in Table 1. As expected, keeping the training exemplars in the buffer and adding more test classes makes the task harder. Nevertheless, the accuracy stays remarkably high, showing that the equivariant network has learned a correct and universal mechanism that works even for previously unseen shapes. This is the essence of our framework. 5.5. Open-set classification Next, we investigate how well our proposed framework can detect novel shapes. This differs from the one-shot generalization task because we do not add the exemplars corresponding to the novel shapes to the buffer. Instead of modifying the learning setup, we use a simple heuristic based on an empirical observation that our model can almost perfectly normalize any input—we classify the input image as unseen if we can’t find an exemplar that matches the normalized input significantly better than others. This paper is available on arxiv under CC 4.0 license. Authors: (1) Sebastian Dziadzio, University of Tübingen (sebastian.dziadzio@uni-tuebingen.de); (2) Çagatay Yıldız, University of Tübingen; (3) Gido M. van de Ven, KU Leuven; (4) Tomasz Trzcinski, IDEAS NCBR, Warsaw University of Technology, Tooploox; (5) Tinne Tuytelaars, KU Leuven; (6) Matthias Bethge, University of Tübingen. Authors: Authors: (1) Sebastian Dziadzio, University of Tübingen (sebastian.dziadzio@uni-tuebingen.de); (2) Çagatay Yıldız, University of Tübingen; (3) Gido M. van de Ven, KU Leuven; (4) Tomasz Trzcinski, IDEAS NCBR, Warsaw University of Technology, Tooploox; (5) Tinne Tuytelaars, KU Leuven; (6) Matthias Bethge, University of Tübingen. Table of Links Abstract and 1. Introduction Abstract and 1. Introduction 2. Two problems with the current approach to class-incremental continual learning 2. Two problems with the current approach to class-incremental continual learning 3. Methods and 3.1. Infinite dSprites 3. Methods and 3.1. Infinite dSprites 3.2. Disentangled learning 3.2. Disentangled learning 4. Related work 4.1. Continual learning and 4.2. Benchmarking continual learning 4.1. Continual learning and 4.2. Benchmarking continual learning 5. Experiments 5. Experiments 5.1. Regularization methods and 5.2. Replay-based methods 5.1. Regularization methods and 5.2. Replay-based methods 5.3. Do we need equivariance? 5.3. Do we need equivariance? 5.4. One-shot generalization and 5.5. Open-set classification 5.4. One-shot generalization and 5.5. Open-set classification 5.6. Online vs. offline 5.6. Online vs. offline Conclusion, Acknowledgments and References Conclusion, Acknowledgments and References Supplementary Material Supplementary Material 5.4. One-shot generalization To evaluate whether the learned regression network can generalize to unseen classes, we perform a one-shot learning experiment. Here, the model had to normalize and classify transformed versions of shapes it had not previously encountered. Since the returned class label depends on the exemplars in the buffer, we consider two variants of the experiment, corresponding to generalized and standard one-shot learning. In the first one, we keep the training exemplars in the buffer and add new ones. In the second, the buffer is cleared before including novel exemplars. We also introduce different numbers of test classes. The classification accuracies are presented in Table 1. As expected, keeping the training exemplars in the buffer and adding more test classes makes the task harder. Nevertheless, the accuracy stays remarkably high, showing that the equivariant network has learned a correct and universal mechanism that works even for previously unseen shapes. This is the essence of our framework. 5.5. Open-set classification Next, we investigate how well our proposed framework can detect novel shapes. This differs from the one-shot generalization task because we do not add the exemplars corresponding to the novel shapes to the buffer. Instead of modifying the learning setup, we use a simple heuristic based on an empirical observation that our model can almost perfectly normalize any input—we classify the input image as unseen if we can’t find an exemplar that matches the normalized input significantly better than others. This paper is available on arxiv under CC 4.0 license. This paper is available on arxiv under CC 4.0 license. available on arxiv

Part of HackerNoon's growing list of open-source research papers, promoting free access to academic material.

Batch Training vs. Online Learning

Why Equivariance Outperforms Invariant Learning in Continual Learning Tasks

FEW SHOT .tech

Too Long; Didn't Read

Get Free Unlimited IP Geo Data With IPinfo Lite

One-Shot Generalization and Open-Set Classification

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Untitled Story

A Close Look at Misalignment in Pretraining Datasets

Disentangled Continual Learning: Separating Memory Edits from Model Updates

Two Problems With the Current Approach to Class-Incremental Continual Learning

Unlocking New Potential in Continual Learning with the Infinite dSprites Framework

How Disentangled Learning Tackles Catastrophic Forgetting

A Close Look at Misalignment in Pretraining Datasets

Disentangled Continual Learning: Separating Memory Edits from Model Updates

Two Problems With the Current Approach to Class-Incremental Continual Learning

Unlocking New Potential in Continual Learning with the Infinite dSprites Framework

How Disentangled Learning Tackles Catastrophic Forgetting

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps