ON PURIFICATION OF AIR BY OZONE—WITH AN ACCOUNT OF A NEW METHOD

Scientific American Supplement, No. 717, September 28, 1889, by Various, is part of the HackerNoon Books Series. You can jump to any chapter in this book . ON PURIFICATION OF AIR BY OZONE—WITH AN ACCOUNT OF A NEW METHOD. here ON PURIFICATION OF AIR BY OZONE—WITH AN ACCOUNT OF A NEW METHOD.[1] By Dr. B. W. Richardson. During the time when I was engaged in my preliminary medical studies—for I never admit to this day of being anything less than a medical student—the substance called ozone became the topic of much conversation and speculation. I cannot say that ozone was a discovery of that date, for in the early part of the century Von Marum had observed that when electrical discharges were made through oxygen in a glass cylinder inverted over water, the water rose in the cylinder as if something had either been taken away from the gas, or as if the gas itself had been condensed, and was therefore occupying a smaller space. It had also been observed by many electricians that during a passage of the electric spark through air or oxygen, there was a peculiar emanation or odor which some compared to fresh sea air, others to the air after a thunderstorm, when the sky has become very clear, the firmament blue, and the stars, if visible, extremely bright. But it was not until the time, or about the time, of which I have spoken, 1846-49, that these discovered but unexplained phenomena received proper recognition. The distinguished physicist Schonbein first, if I may so say, isolated the substance which yielded the phenomena, and gave to it the name, by which it has since generally been known, of ozone, which means, to emit an odor; a name, I have always thought, not particularly happy, but which has become, practically, so fully recognized and understood, that it would be wrong now to disturb it. Schonbein made ozone by the action of the electric spark on oxygen. He collected it, he tested its chemical properties, he announced it to be oxygen in a modified form, and he traced its action as an active oxidizer of various substances, and especially of organic substances, even when they were in a state of decomposition. But Schonbein went further than this. He argued that ozone was a natural part of the atmosphere, and that in places where there was no decomposition, that is to say, in places away from great towns, ozone was present. On the high tower of a cathedral in a big city he discovered ozone; in the city, at the foot of the tower, he found no ozone at the same time. He argued, therefore, that the ozone above was used up in purifying the town below, and so suggested quite a new explanation of the purification of air. The subject was very soon taken up by English observers, and I remember well a lecture upon it by Michael Faraday, in which that illustrious philosopher, confirming Schonbein, stated that he had discovered ozone freely on the Brighton Downs, and had found the evidence of it diminishing as he approached Brighton, until it was lost altogether in the town itself. Such was the beginning of our knowledge of ozone, the precise nature of which has not yet been completely made out. At the present time it is held to be oxygen condensed. To use a chemical phrase, the molecule of oxygen, which in the ordinary state is composed of two atoms, is condensed, in ozone, as three atoms. By the electric spark discharged in dry oxygen as much as 15 per cent. may, under proper conditions, be turned into ozone. Ozone has also been found to be heavier than air. Professor Zinno says, that compared with an equal volume of air its density is equal to 1,658, and that it is forty-eight times heavier than hydrogen. Heat decomposes it; at the temperature of boiling water it begins to decompose. In water it is much less soluble than oxygen, and indeed is practically insoluble; when made to bubble through boiling water, it ceases to be ozone. The oxidizing power of ozone is very much greater than that of oxygen, and, according to Saret, when ozone is decomposed, one part of it enters into combination, the other remains simply as oxygen. It is remarkable that some substances, like turpentine and cinnamon, absorb ozone and combine with it, a simple fact of much greater importance than has ever been attached to it. I found, for instance, that cinnamon which by exposure to the air has been made odorless and, as it is said, "spoiled," can be made to reabsorb ozone and gain a kind of freshness. It is certain also that some substances which are supposed to have disinfecting properties owe what virtues they possess to the presence of ozone. On some grand scale ozone is formed in the air, and my former friend and colleague, the late Dr. Moffatt, of Hawarden, with whom I wrote a paper on "Meteorology and Disease," read before the Epidemiological Society in 1852-53, described what he designated ozone periods of the atmosphere, connecting these with storms. When the atmospheric pressure is decreasing, when with that there is increasing warmth and moisture, and when south and southwesterly winds prevail, then ozone is active; but when the atmospheric pressure is increasing, when the air is becoming dry and cold, and north and northeasterly winds prevail, then the presence of ozone is less active. These facts have also been put in another way, namely, that the maximum period of ozone occurs when there is greatest evaporation of water from the earth, and the minimum when there is greatest condensation of water on the earth; a theory which tallies well with the idea that ozone is most freely present when electricity is being produced, least present when electricity is in smallest quantity. Mr. Buchan, reporting on the observations of the Scottish Meteorological Society, records that ozone is most abundant from February to June, when the average amount is 6.0; and least from July to January, when the average is 5.7; the maximum, 6.2, being reached in May, and the minimum, 5.3, in November. This same excellent observer states that "ozone is more abundant on the sea coast than inland; in the west than the east of Great Britain; in elevated than in low situations; with southwest than with northeast winds; in the country than in towns; and on the windward than the leeward side of towns." Recently a very singular hypothesis has been broached in regard to the blue color of the firmament and ozone. It has been observed that when a tube is filled with ozone, the light transmitted through it is of a blue color; from which fact it is assumed that the blue color of the sky is due to the presence of this body in the higher atmospheric strata. The hypothesis is in entire accord with the suggestion of Professor Dove, to which Moffatt always paid the greatest respect, viz., that the source of ozone for the whole of the planet is equatorial, and that the point of development of ozone is where the terrestrial atmosphere raised to its highest altitude, at the equator, expands out north and south in opposite directions toward the two poles, to return to the equator over the earth as the trade winds. It is necessary for all who would understand the applications of ozone for any purpose, whether for bleaching purposes or pure chemical purposes, or for medical or sanitary purposes, to understand these preliminary facts concerning it, facts which bring me to the particular point to which I wish to refer to-day. In my essay describing the model city, Hygeiopolis, it was suggested that in every town there should be a building like a gas house, in which ozone should be made and stored, and from which it should be dispensed to every street or house at pleasure. This suggestion was made as the final result of observations which had been going on since I first began to work at the subject in 1852. It occurred to me from the moment when I first made ozone by Schonbein's method, that the value of it in a hygienic point of view was incalculable. To my then young and enthusiastic mind it seemed that in ozone we had a means of stopping all putrefaction, of destroying all infectious substances, and of actually commanding and destroying the causes which produced the great spreading diseases; and, although increase of years and greater experience have toned down the enthusiasm, I still believe that here one of the most useful fields for investigation remains almost unexplored. In my first experiments I subjected decomposing blood to ozone, and found that the products of decomposition were instantly destroyed, and that the fluid was rendered odorless and sweet. I discovered that the red corpuscles of fresh blood decomposed ozone, and that coagulated blood underwent a degree of solution through its action. I put dead birds and pieces of animal substances that had undergone extreme decomposition into atmospheres containing ozone, and observed the rapidity with which the products of decomposition were neutralized and rendered harmless. I employed ozone medicinally, by having it inhaled by persons who were suffering from fœtor of the breath, and with remarkable success, and I began to employ it and have employed it ever since (that is to say, for thirty-seven years), for purposes of disinfection and deodorization, in close rooms, closets, and the like. I should have used it much more largely but for one circumstance, namely, the almost impracticable difficulty of making it with sufficient ease and in sufficient quantities to meet the necessities of sanitary practice. We are often obstructed in this way. We know of something exceedingly useful, but we cannot utilize it. This was the case with ozone. I hope now that difficulty is overcome. If it is, we shall start from this day on a new era in regard to ozone as an instrument of sanitation. As we have seen, ozone was originally made by charging dry oxygen or common dry air with electricity from sparks or points. Afterward Faraday showed that it could be made by holding a warm glass rod in vapor of ether. Again he showed that it could be made by passing air over bright phosphorus half immersed in water. Then Siemens modified the electric process by inventing his well known ozone tube, which consists of a wide glass tube coated with tinfoil on its outside, and holding within it a smaller glass tube coated with tinfoil on its surface. When a current of dry air or oxygen was passed in current between these two tubes, and the electric spark from a Ruhmkorf coil was discharged by the terminal wires connected with tinfoil surfaces, ozone was freely produced, and this was no doubt the best method, for by means of a double-acting hand bellows currents of ozone could be driven over very freely. One of these tubes with hand bellows attached, which I have had in use for twenty-four years, is before the meeting, and answers as well as ever. The practical difficulty lies in the requirement of a battery, a large coil, and a separate bellows as well as the tube. My dear and most distinguished friend, the late Professor Polli, of Milan, tried to overcome the difficulties arising from the use of the coil by making ozone chemically, namely, by the decomposition of permanganate of potassa with strong sulphuric acid. He placed the permanganate in glass vessels, moistened it gradually with the acid, and then allowed the ozone, which is formed, to diffuse into the air. In this way he endeavored, as I had done, to purify the air of rooms, especially those vitiated by the breaths of many people. When he visited me, not very long before his death, he was enthusiastic as to the success that must attend the utilization of ozone for purification, and when I expressed a practical doubt, he rallied me by saying I must not desert my own child. At the theater La Scala, on the occasion of an unusually full attendance, Polli collected the condensible part of the exhaled organic matter, by means of a large glass bell filled with ice and placed over the circular opening in the roof, which corresponds with the large central light. The deposit on this bell was liquid and had a mouldy smell; was for some few days limpid, but then became very thick and had a nauseous odor. When mixed with a solution of one part glucose to four parts of water, and kept at a temperature of from 20° to 24° C., this liquid underwent a slow fermentation, with the formation, on the superficies, of green must; during the same period of time, and placed under the same conditions, a similar glucose solution underwent no change whatever. By the use of his ozone bottles Polli believed that he had supplied a means most suitable for directly destroying in the air miasmatic principles, without otherwise interfering with the respiratory functions. The ozonized air had neither a powerful nor an offensive smell, and it might be easily and economically made. The smell of ozone was scarcely perceptible, and was far less disagreeable than chlorine, bromine, and iodine, while it was more efficacious than either of these; if, therefore, its application as a purifier of a vitiated air succeeded, it would probably supply all the exigences of defective ventilation in crowded atmospheres. In confined places vessels might be placed containing mixtures of permanganate of potassa or soda and acid in proper quantities, and of which the duration of the action was known; or sulphuric acid could be dropped upon the permanganate. This idea of applying ozone was no doubt very ingenious, and in the bottles before us on the table, which have been prepared in Hastings by Mr. Rossiter, we see it in operation. The disadvantages of the plan are that manipulation with strong sulphuric acid is never an agreeable or safe process, and that the ozone evolved cannot be on a large scale without considerable trouble. In 1875 Dr. Lender published a process for the production of ozone. In this process he used equal parts of manganese, permanganate of potash, and oxalic acid. When this mixture is placed in contact with water, ozone is quickly generated. For a room of medium size two spoonfuls of this powder, placed in a dish and occasionally diluted with water, would be sufficient. As the ozone is developed, it disinfects the surrounding air without producing cough. Lender's process is very useful when ozone is wanted on a limited scale. We have some of it here prepared by Mr. Rossiter, and it answers exceedingly well; but it would be impossible to generate sufficient ozone by this plan for the large application that would be required should it come into general use. The process deserves to be remembered, and the physician may find it valuable as a means by which ozone may be medically applied, to wounds, or by inhalation when there are fœtid exhalations from the mouth or nostrils. A NEW METHOD. For the past ten or fifteen years the manufacture of ozone, for the reasons related above, has remained in abeyance, and it is to a new mode, which will, I trust, mark another stage of advancement, that I now wish to direct attention. Some years since, Mr. Wimshurst, a most able electrician, invented the electrical machine which goes by his name. The machine, as will be seen from the specimen of it on the table, looks something like the old electrical machine, but differs in that there is no friction, and that the plates of glass with their metal sectors, separated a little distance from each other, revolve, when the handle of the machine is turned, in opposite directions. The machine when it is in good working order (and it is very easily kept in good working order) produces electricity abundantly, and in working it I observed that ozone was so freely generated, that more than once the air of my laboratory became charged with ozone to an oppressive degree. The fact led me to use this machine for the production of ozone on a large scale, in the following way. From the terminals of the machine two wires are carried and are conducted, by their terminals, to an ozone generator formed somewhat after the manner of Siemens', but with this difference, that the discharge is made through a series of fine points within the cylinders. The machine is placed on a table with the ozone generator at the back of it, and can be so arranged that with the turning of the handle which works the machine a blast of air is carried through the generator. Thus by one action electricity is generated, sparks are discharged in the ozone generator, air is driven through, and ozone is delivered over freely. If it be wished to use pure oxygen instead of common air, nothing more is required than to use compressed oxygen and to allow a gentle current to pass through the ozone generator in place of air. For this purpose Brin's compressed oxygen is the purest and best; but for ordinary service atmospheric air is sufficient.2 The advantages of this apparatus are as follows: With care it is always ready for use, and as no battery is required nor anything more than the turning of a handle, any person can work it. It can be readily moved about from one part of a room or ward to another part. If required for the sick it can be wheeled near the bedside and, by a tube, the ozone it emits can be brought into action in any way desired by the physician. I refer in the above to the minor uses of ozone by this method, but I should add that it admits of application on a much grander scale. It would now be quite easy in any public institution to have a room in which a large compound Wimshurst could be worked with a gas engine, and from which, with the additional apparatus named, ozone could be distributed at pleasure into any part of the building. On a still larger scale ozone could be supplied to towns by this method, as suggested in Hygeiopolis, the model city. It will occur, I doubt not, to the learned president of this section, and to others of our common profession, that care will have to be taken in the application of ozone that it be used with discretion. This is true. It has been observed in regard to diseases, that in the presence of some diseases ozone is absent in the atmosphere, but that with other diseases ozone is present in abundance. During epidemics of cholera, ozone is at a minimum. During other epidemics, like influenza, it has been at a maximum. In our paper Dr. Moffatt and I classified diseases under both conditions, and the difference must never be forgotten, since in some diseases we might by the use of ozone do mischief instead of good. Moreover, as my published experiments have shown, prolonged inhalation of ozone produces headache, coryza, soreness of the eyes, soreness of the throat, general malaise, and all the symptoms of severe influenza cold. Warm-blooded animals, also, exposed to it in full charge, suffer from congestion of the lungs, which may prove rapidly fatal. With care, however, these dangers are easily avoided, the point of practice being never to charge the air with ozone too abundantly or too long. A simple test affords good evidence as to presence of ozone. If into twenty ounces of water there be put one ounce of starch and forty grains of potassium iodide, and the whole be boiled together, a starch will be made which can be used as a test for ozone. If ozone be passed through this starch the potassium is oxidized, and the iodine, set free, strikes a blue color with the starch. Or bibulous paper can be dipped in the starch, dried and cut into slips, and these slips being placed in the air will indicate when ozone is present. In disinfecting or purifying the air of a room with ozone, there is no occasion to stop until the test paper, by change of color, shows that the ozone has done its work of destroying the organic matter which is the cause of impurity or danger. For my own part, I have never seen the slightest risk from the use of ozone in an impure air. The difficulty has always been to obtain sufficient ozone to remove the impurity, and it is this difficulty which I hope now to have conquered.—The Asclepiad. [1] Paper read in Section C, Domestic Health, at the Hastings Health Congress, on Friday, May 3, 1889. [2] For illustration to-day, Messrs Mayfield, the electrical engineers of Queen Victoria Street, E. C., have been good enough to lend me a machine fitted up on the plan named. It works so effectively that I can make the ozone given off from it detectable in every part of this large hall. About HackerNoon Book Series: We bring you the most important technical, scientific, and insightful public domain books. This book is part of the public domain. Various (2006). Scientific American Supplement, No. 717, September 28, 1889. Urbana, Illinois: Project Gutenberg. Retrieved https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/17755/pg17755-images.html This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at , located at . www.gutenberg.org https://www.gutenberg.org/policy/license.html