Set of troubling technology issues this week — intolerance, quantum computers, trust, voice assistants — suggest things will likely get much worse before they get better.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
“Paradox of Tolerance says that a tolerant society should be intolerant of one thing: intolerance…[otherwise] society allows intolerance to take over [and]…destroy the tolerant society and there will be no tolerance left….
[Tech] should not support intolerant speech when it endangers the existence of tolerant society [and]…propose the following rule…in deciding which content to host or clients to support….[If]
[Still] use this rule in addition to all your existing rules against spam, fraud, illegal activity, etc. Implementation is key. Be proactive in seeking out violations, have a diverse empowered decision making team, and collaborate with outside experts.” https://frameshiftconsulting.com/2017/09/10/the-intolerable-speech-rule-the-paradox-of-tolerance-for-tech-companies/
“Quantum [computing]…[goes] far beyond the capabilities of today’s [computers]…. D-Wave 2000Q can ‘solve larger problems than…previously possible, with faster performance….[IBM] 50-qubit processor prototype [and]…provide online access to 20-qubit [system]…..[Microsoft’s] new quantum…programming language and stable topological qubit technology…[can] scale up the number of qubits….
[Still] physical issues that must be worked out, such as…only operate at cryogenic temperatures…[Intel] is convinced that it is just a matter of time before the full power of quantum computing is unleashed…[and] applied anywhere where we’re using machine learning, cloud computing, data analysis….
[NSA] has sounded the alarm on the risks to cybersecurity…effectively breaking public key cryptography’…[and ] many experts believe [possible]… [in] a decade to a decade and a half….
[But] commercially viable…cloud services could happen even more quickly…[and] in the hands of hackers makes possible all sorts of scams that don’t even exist yet….
Hackers are very well-funded today, and [could]…buy a quantum computer and begin selling encryption-busting services [now]….
The solution lies in the development of quantum-safe cryptography….[It’s] certain that the threats to privacy and information security will only multiply in the coming decades.” https://techcrunch.com/2018/01/05/the-quantum-computing-apocalypse-is-imminent/
“[T]he public may be losing trust in technology.
U.S. residents…spend 10 hours a day in front of a screen…[and] ‘internet of things,’ self-driving cars, blockchain…and artificial intelligence …only likely to grow… because half the world’s population is still not online… [and] traffic per month per user will grow 150 percent from 2016 to 2021 ….
[Russia] has raised concerns about whether the openness and reach of digital media is a threat to the functioning of democracies….[Automation] could displace one-third of the U.S. workforce by 2030….
In areas of the world with smaller digital economies…users tend to exhibit more trusting behaviors online…. Because people in more mature markets have less trust…expect tech companies to invest in trust-building…[and] more clearly label the sources of information… winning more loyalty from customers….
[But] some countries…need governments to enact strong digital policies to protect people from fake news and fraudulent scams, as well as regulatory oversight to protect consumers’ data privacy and human rights….
All consumers will need to remain on guard against overreach by heavy-handed authorities or autocratic governments.” https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/trust-in-digital-technology-will-be-the-internet-rsquo-s-next-frontier-for-2018-and-beyond/
“[While] Amazon and Google sold millions of smart speakers in 2017, the digital assistant wars are just getting started…[so] trends to watch [are]….
“Siri and Cortana… [give] impression that a humanlike intelligence lies behind the program’s friendly voice…[so] people readily build strong bonds with computerized helpers…whether visual or vocal….
[That] can, however, cut both ways…[when] interaction is embarrassment…[and] reluctant to ask for help…[Clearly] some people…wish to avoid losing face by seeking help from an icon…[suggesting] there are circumstances when the relentless pseudo-humanization of machine-human interactions could usefully be curbed.” https://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21733974-consequence-people-may-be-embarrassed-use-them-sometimes-computer
Find more of my ideas on Medium at, A Passion to Evolve.
Or click the Follow button below to add me to your feed.
Prefer a weekly email newsletter — no ads, no spam, & never sell the list — email me [email protected] with
“add me” in the subject line.
May you live long and prosper!Doc Huston