Authors:
(1) Martyna Wiącek, Institute of Computer Science, Polish Academy of Sciences;
(2) Piotr Rybak, Institute of Computer Science, Polish Academy of Sciences;
(3) Łukasz Pszenny, Institute of Computer Science, Polish Academy of Sciences;
(4) Alina Wróblewska, Institute of Computer Science, Polish Academy of Sciences. Editor's note: This is Part 5 of 10 of a study on improving the evaluation and comparison of tools used in natural language preprocessing. Read the rest below. Table of Links Abstract and 1. Introduction and related works NLPre benchmarking 2.1. Research concept 2.2. Online benchmarking system 2.3. Configuration NLPre-PL benchmark 3.1. Datasets 3.2. Tasks Evaluation 4.1. Evaluation methodology 4.2. Evaluated systems 4.3. Results Conclusions

Appendices
Acknowledgements
Bibliographical References
Language Resource References 3. NLPre-PL benchmark 3.1. Datasets NKJP1M (Przepiórkowski et al., 2018) The NKJP1M subcorpus of the Polish National Corpus (Przepiórkowski et al., 2012) is manually annotated according to the NKJP tagset (Szałkiewicz and Przepiórkowski, 2012) and afterwards modified in line with the Morfeusz tagset (Woliński, 2019). This balanced subset of thematic- and genre-diverse texts and transcriptions is used to train Polish POS taggers. NKJP1M is maintained in two formats: TEI[8] and DAG.[9] These two formats are accepted by older NLPre tools but not modern ones. We thus convert NKJP1M to the CoNLL-X format (Buchholz and Marsi, 2006) preserving the original segmentation, POS tags and morphological features (i.e. the Morfeusz tagset), and to the CoNLL-U format10 with UD tags, Morfeusz tags (XPOS) and UD morphological features. Since there is no generally accepted split of NKJP1M into training, development and testing subsets, we uniformly divide NKJP1M in all formats (i.e. DAG, TEI, CoNLL-X and CoNLL-U) pursuant to the formulated splitting heuristics. Each document in the subcorpus contains multiple paragraphs of continuous textual data. To avoid possible information leakage, we treat each such paragraph as an indivisible unit. To ensure that the subsets include paragraphs of varying length, we investigate the distribution over the number of segments in each paragraph. Since it is akin to Gaussian distribution, we decide to not exclude any data, and we divide the paragraphs into K = 10 buckets of roughly similar size and then sample from them with respective ratios of 0.8:0.1:0.1 (corresponding to train, dev, and test subsets). This data selection technique assures similar distribution of segments number per paragraph in three subsets, hereafter byName. For creating our second split, hereafter byType, we consider the type of document a paragraph belongs to. We first group paragraphs into categories equal to the document types, and then we repeat the above-mentioned procedure per category (see the summary of NKJP1M and data splits in Table 1). PDB-UD (Wróblewska, 2018) Polish Dependency Bank is the largest collection of Polish sentences manually annotated with dependency trees and afterwards converted into UD representations in line with the UD annotation schema (de Marneffe et al., 2021). PDB-UD slightly correlates with NKJP1M, i.e., a subset of the PDB-UD sentences comes from NKJP1M, and the language-specific tags (XPOS) in PDB-UD match the Morfeusz tagset. PDB-UD is typically used to train NLPre systems for Polish. In NLPre-PL, we use the original PDB-UD data without any modifications and its standard split (see the statistical summary of PDB-UD in Table 1). This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 DEED license. [8] http://nlp.ipipan.waw.pl/TEI4NKJP. [9] https://github.com/kawu/concraft-pl#data-format [10] https://universaldependencies.org/format.html Authors: (1) Martyna Wiącek, Institute of Computer Science, Polish Academy of Sciences; (2) Piotr Rybak, Institute of Computer Science, Polish Academy of Sciences; (3) Łukasz Pszenny, Institute of Computer Science, Polish Academy of Sciences; (4) Alina Wróblewska, Institute of Computer Science, Polish Academy of Sciences. Authors: Authors: (1) Martyna Wiącek, Institute of Computer Science, Polish Academy of Sciences; (2) Piotr Rybak, Institute of Computer Science, Polish Academy of Sciences; (3) Łukasz Pszenny, Institute of Computer Science, Polish Academy of Sciences; (4) Alina Wróblewska, Institute of Computer Science, Polish Academy of Sciences. Editor's note: This is Part 5 of 10 of a study on improving the evaluation and comparison of tools used in natural language preprocessing. Read the rest below. Editor's note: This is Part 5 of 10 of a study on improving the evaluation and comparison of tools used in natural language preprocessing. Read the rest below. Editor's note: This is Part 5 of 10 of a study on improving the evaluation and comparison of tools used in natural language preprocessing. Read the rest below. Editor's note: This is Part 5 of 10 of a study on improving the evaluation and comparison of tools used in natural language preprocessing. Read the rest below. Table of Links Abstract and 1. Introduction and related works Abstract and 1. Introduction and related works NLPre benchmarking NLPre benchmarking 2.1. Research concept 2.1. Research concept 2.2. Online benchmarking system 2.2. Online benchmarking system 2.3. Configuration 2.3. Configuration NLPre-PL benchmark NLPre-PL benchmark 3.1. Datasets 3.1. Datasets 3.2. Tasks 3.2. Tasks Evaluation Evaluation 4.1. Evaluation methodology 4.1. Evaluation methodology 4.2. Evaluated systems 4.2. Evaluated systems 4.3. Results 4.3. Results Conclusions

Appendices
Acknowledgements
Bibliographical References
Language Resource References Conclusions Appendices
Acknowledgements
Bibliographical References
Language Resource References Conclusions Appendices Acknowledgements Bibliographical References Language Resource References Appendices Acknowledgements Bibliographical References Language Resource References 3. NLPre-PL benchmark 3.1. Datasets NKJP1M (Przepiórkowski et al., 2018) The NKJP1M subcorpus of the Polish National Corpus (Przepiórkowski et al., 2012) is manually annotated according to the NKJP tagset (Szałkiewicz and Przepiórkowski, 2012) and afterwards modified in line with the Morfeusz tagset (Woliński, 2019). This balanced subset of thematic- and genre-diverse texts and transcriptions is used to train Polish POS taggers. NKJP1M is maintained in two formats: TEI[8] and DAG.[9] These two formats are accepted by older NLPre tools but not modern ones. We thus convert NKJP1M to the CoNLL-X format (Buchholz and Marsi, 2006) preserving the original segmentation, POS tags and morphological features (i.e. the Morfeusz tagset), and to the CoNLL-U format10 with UD tags, Morfeusz tags (XPOS) and UD morphological features. NKJP1M Since there is no generally accepted split of NKJP1M into training, development and testing subsets, we uniformly divide NKJP1M in all formats (i.e. DAG, TEI, CoNLL-X and CoNLL-U) pursuant to the formulated splitting heuristics. Each document in the subcorpus contains multiple paragraphs of continuous textual data. To avoid possible information leakage, we treat each such paragraph as an indivisible unit. To ensure that the subsets include paragraphs of varying length, we investigate the distribution over the number of segments in each paragraph. Since it is akin to Gaussian distribution, we decide to not exclude any data, and we divide the paragraphs into K = 10 buckets of roughly similar size and then sample from them with respective ratios of 0.8:0.1:0.1 (corresponding to train, dev, and test subsets). This data selection technique assures similar distribution of segments number per paragraph in three subsets, hereafter byName. For creating our second split, hereafter byType, we consider the type of document a paragraph belongs to. We first group paragraphs into categories equal to the document types, and then we repeat the above-mentioned procedure per category (see the summary of NKJP1M and data splits in Table 1). PDB-UD (Wróblewska, 2018) Polish Dependency Bank is the largest collection of Polish sentences manually annotated with dependency trees and afterwards converted into UD representations in line with the UD annotation schema (de Marneffe et al., 2021). PDB-UD slightly correlates with NKJP1M, i.e., a subset of the PDB-UD sentences comes from NKJP1M, and the language-specific tags (XPOS) in PDB-UD match the Morfeusz tagset. PDB-UD is typically used to train NLPre systems for Polish. In NLPre-PL, we use the original PDB-UD data without any modifications and its standard split (see the statistical summary of PDB-UD in Table 1). PDB-UD This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 DEED license. This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 DEED license. available on arxiv [8] http://nlp.ipipan.waw.pl/TEI4NKJP. [9] https://github.com/kawu/concraft-pl#data-format [10] https://universaldependencies.org/format.html

Part of HackerNoon's growing list of open-source research papers, promoting free access to academic material.

New Framework Promises to Train AI to Better Understand Hard-to-Grasp Languages Like Polish

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

AI Breakthrough Sharpens Telescope Images-Astronomy’s Next Big Leap

New Framework Simplifies Comparison of Language Processing Tools Across Multiple Languages

Researchers Build Public Leaderboard for Language Processing Tools

New Web App Lets Researchers Test and Rank Language AI Tools in Real Time

Researchers Create Plug-and-Play System to Test Language AI Across the Globe

Researchers Challenge AI to Tackle the Toughest Parts of Language Processing

AI Breakthrough Sharpens Telescope Images-Astronomy’s Next Big Leap

New Framework Simplifies Comparison of Language Processing Tools Across Multiple Languages

Researchers Build Public Leaderboard for Language Processing Tools

New Web App Lets Researchers Test and Rank Language AI Tools in Real Time

Researchers Create Plug-and-Play System to Test Language AI Across the Globe

Researchers Challenge AI to Tackle the Toughest Parts of Language Processing

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Minty

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps