Systematize your database— The Ruby way to be the croupier of migrations.

Written by ricardobrazao | Published 2016/12/22
Tech Story Tags: ruby-on-rails | rails | ruby | data-migration

TLDRvia the TL;DR App

Ever wondered how the croupiers do that shuffle when they separate the card deck in two and just mix both piles into one? I’ve tried that multiple times and the cards just flew everywhere 😞. But now imagine that you could do that shuffling with your data and structure migrations, aligning them to run in the order they should…That would be a cool thing!

While your application starts getting bigger and bigger, probably so does your migration folder and with that you’ll probably need to move some data around different tables, or even change such data because your structure changed as well.

When do you run your migrations? First the data migrations and then the structure migrations or the other way around?

With any of those approaches some errors are prone to happen:

  • On the first approach (data → structure) what would you do, if the field that you need isn’t created yet (because the structure migration hasn’t run)?
  • On the second approach (structure → data) what would you do, if the field that you want to populate needs data from another field that is deleted on the structure migration?

Let me show you an example:

  • Let’s say you have a Post model with a boolean attribute named :deleted that represents the deleted Posts;
  • After some time, and some deleted Posts, you are asked to instead of just knowing that a Post was deleted we also need to know when the Post was deleted. So you create the :deleted_at field that will contain the date it was deleted;
  • Now you create the data migration that searches all the deleted Posts and timestamps the :deleted_at field. So far so good;
  • After that is done you can safely remove the old and obsolete :deleted field.

So with this example we have 2 structural migrations (creating the :deleted_at field and deleting the :deleted field) and 1 data migration (populating the :deleted_at field). It’s all peachy and dandy until you run your migrations because when you finish running the structural ones you will not have a :deleted field to query the Posts that were deleted.

With this in mind let me introduce you to Systematize, the gem that will make that pain go away.

How does it work?

Just add it to your Gemfile:

#Gemfilegem 'systematize', '~> 0.0.1'

or install it via bundler

bundle install 'systematize'

Surprise, surprise you have some shinny new tasks!

$> bundle exec rake -Trake systematize:migrate # Migrate the databaserake systematize:rollback # Rollback the database (options: STEP=x, VERBOSE=false)rake systematize:rollback_all # Rollback all the database

With this your migrations will be re-arranged and they will run in the timespan order to make sure that all goes peachy keen!

It’s not all fun and games you know?

For this to go smoothly as it should you just need to respect some rules:

  • The migrations need to be in the correct folder, for structural migrations it should be db/migrate and the data migrations should live in db/data. Like this:

    • app | |-db |-data |-migrate
  • The migrations need to follow the Rails convention YYYYMMDDHHMMSS_create_products.rb

Time to shine

Now if you need to migrate the database you just need to run:

bundle exec rake systematize:migrate

Needing to rollback the previous migration? No problem.

bundle exec rake systematize:rollback

Need to rollback 2/3/4 migrations? I got you.

bundle exec rake systematize:rollback STEP=2

Made a mess so big you need to start fresh? Do it. (the migrations need to be reversible 😅)

bundle exec rake systematize:rollback_all

Don’t forget to smash that 💚 button and if you have anything to say, just drop like it’s hot @RicBrazao!


Published by HackerNoon on 2016/12/22