Bernstein’s Concentration Inequality In Equivalence Testing

Written by computational | Published 2024/12/09
Tech Story Tags: statistis | equivalence-testing | algorithm-design | concentration-inequality | bernstein-inequality | adaptive-testing | parallel-computing | software-testing-method

TLDRThe paper provides Proof of Claim using concentration inequality.via the TL;DR App

Authors:

(1) Diptarka Chakraborty, National University of Singapore, Singapore

(2) Sourav Chakraborty, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata;

(3) Gunjan Kumar, National University of Singapore, Singapore;

(4) Kuldeep S. Meel, University of Toronto, Toronto.

Table of Links

Abstract and 1 Introduction

2 Notations and Preliminaries

3 Related Work

4 An Efficient One-Round Adaptive Algorithm and 4.1 High-Level Overview

4.2 Algorithm Description

4.3 Technical Analysis

5 Conclusion

6 Acknowledgements and References

A Missing Proofs

B An O(log log n)-query fully adaptive algorithm

A MISSING PROOFS

Therefore, by additive Chernoff bound (Lemma 2.3), the value et = EstTail(D, i, S, β, b, m) returned by the algorithm satisfies

To prove Claims 4.10, 4.11 and 4.12, we will use the following concentration inequality that directly follows from Bernstein’s concentration inequality.

This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 DEED license.


Written by computational | Computational: We take random inputs, follow complex steps, and hope the output makes sense. And then blog about it.
Published by HackerNoon on 2024/12/09