Table of Links Abstract and 1. Introduction Abstract and 1. Introduction Related Work


Task, Datasets, Baseline


RQ 1: Leveraging the Neighbourhood at Inference
4.1. Methods
4.2. Experiments


RQ 2: Leveraging the Neighbourhood at Training
5.1. Methods
5.2. Experiments


RQ 3: Cross-Domain Generalizability


Conclusion


Limitations


Ethics Statement


Bibliographical References Related Work Related Work Related Work Task, Datasets, Baseline Task, Datasets, Baseline Task, Datasets, Baseline RQ 1: Leveraging the Neighbourhood at Inference
4.1. Methods
4.2. Experiments RQ 1: Leveraging the Neighbourhood at Inference 4.1. Methods 4.1. Methods 4.2. Experiments 4.2. Experiments RQ 2: Leveraging the Neighbourhood at Training
5.1. Methods
5.2. Experiments RQ 2: Leveraging the Neighbourhood at Training RQ 2: Leveraging the Neighbourhood at Training 5.1. Methods 5.1. Methods 5.2. Experiments 5.2. Experiments RQ 3: Cross-Domain Generalizability RQ 3: Cross-Domain Generalizability RQ 3: Cross-Domain Generalizability Conclusion Conclusion Conclusion Limitations Limitations Limitations Ethics Statement Ethics Statement Ethics Statement Bibliographical References Bibliographical References Bibliographical References 2. Related Work Rhetorical Role Labeling Initial efforts of RRL aimed to facilitate summarization tasks (Saravanan et al., 2008; Farzindar and Lapalme, 2004). Saravanan et al. 2008 employed Conditional Random Fields on hand-crafted features, to identify seven rhetorical roles in Indian state High Court documents. Savelka and Ashley 2018 categorized text into functional segments (Introduction, Background, Analysis, and Footnotes) and issue-specific segments (Analysis and Conclusion) using CRF on a corpus of US trade secret and cybercrime decisions. Walker et al. 2019 adopted feature-based methods for segmenting U.S. Board of Veterans’ Appeals decisions. Nejadgholi et al. 2017 focused on identifying factual and non-factual sentences in Canadian immigration case documents, using FastText embeddings for query-oriented search engine application. Rhetorical Role Labeling Recently, deep learning-based classification have been applied to this task in various contexts, such as Japanese documents (Yamada et al., 2019), Indian Supreme Court documents (Bhattacharya et al., 2021; Ghosh and Wyner, 2019; Malik et al., 2022; Kalamkar et al., 2022). These methods adopt hierarchical approaches to account for the sequential sentence classification nature of the task, drawing context from surrounding sentences. This has been the defacto architecture for this task, with modifications ranging from word embeddings initially (Bhattacharya et al., 2021; Ghosh and Wyner, 2019) to BERT based contextualized embeddings recently (Malik et al., 2022; Kalamkar et al., 2022). Recently, Santosh et al. 2023 reformulated the task as span-level sequential classification that segment the document into sets of contiguous sequence of sentences (spans) and assign them labels. In our work, we make use of the Indian Supreme Court corpus from prior research, proposing algorithms to effectively enhance their performance leveraging the knowledge from analogous neighbourly instances both at inference time without re-training, and also during training. Recently, Savelka et al. 2021 investigated the transferability of rhetorical segmentation models across seven jurisdictions and six languages, including Canada, the US, Czech Republic, Italy, Germany, Poland and France. In this study we also examine cross-domain performance on Indian Supreme Court documents across different legal contexts. Leveraging Neighborhood Information Utilizing neighborhood information offers two pathways: one during inference and the other during training. Inference-time methods, commonly applied in few-shot classification, facilitate label assignment based on proximity to training examples without any re-training (Snell et al., 2017; Yang and Katiyar, 2020). Various techniques include employing all examples to identify nearest neighbors for the final label assignment (Yang and Katiyar, 2020) and constructing prototypes based on examples of the same label (Snell et al., 2017), among others. This concept has gained widespread attention as retrieval-augmented models in various tasks, including language modeling (Khandelwal et al., 2019; Zheng et al., 2021), machine translation (Zheng et al., 2021)named entity recognition (Wang et al., 2022b) and multi-label text classification (Wang et al., 2022a). Leveraging Neighborhood Information On the training side, methods like contrastive learning have been applied in self-supervised representation learning (Gao et al., 2021), wherein neighbour constraints are enforced in the embedding space through data augmentation. More recently, they have been extended to supervised learning scenarios using instances with the same label as neighbors (Khosla et al., 2020). Another approach is prototypical learning (Ding et al., 2020), which designates representative prototypes for each class as guiding points to enforce neighborhood constraints on data instances. In this study, we harness both training and inference-based neighbour learning strategies. Additionally, we explore the their capabilities in cross-domain scenarios, within the context of the RRL task. Authors:
(1) Santosh T.Y.S.S, School of Computation, Information, and Technology; Technical University of Munich, Germany (santosh.tokala@tum.de);
(2) Hassan Sarwat, School of Computation, Information, and Technology; Technical University of Munich, Germany (hassan.sarwat@tum.de);
(3) Ahmed Abdou, School of Computation, Information, and Technology; Technical University of Munich, Germany (ahmed.abdou@tum.de);
(4) Matthias Grabmair, School of Computation, Information, and Technology; Technical University of Munich, Germany (matthias.grabmair@tum.de). Authors: Authors: (1) Santosh T.Y.S.S, School of Computation, Information, and Technology; Technical University of Munich, Germany (santosh.tokala@tum.de); (2) Hassan Sarwat, School of Computation, Information, and Technology; Technical University of Munich, Germany (hassan.sarwat@tum.de); (3) Ahmed Abdou, School of Computation, Information, and Technology; Technical University of Munich, Germany (ahmed.abdou@tum.de); (4) Matthias Grabmair, School of Computation, Information, and Technology; Technical University of Munich, Germany (matthias.grabmair@tum.de). This paper is available on arxiv under CC by 4.0 Deed (Attribution 4.0 International) license. This paper is available on arxiv under CC by 4.0 Deed (Attribution 4.0 International) license. available on arxiv available on arxiv

Part of HackerNoon's growing list of open-source research papers, promoting free access to academic material.

Improving Legal Document Labeling by Comparing Similar Sentences

Datasets and Models Used to Analyze Legal Documents

Instancing.TECH

Too Long; Didn't Read

Get Free Unlimited IP Geo Data With IPinfo Lite

Leveraging Deep Learning for Legal Text Analysis

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

A Coarse-to-Fine Approach to Text-Guided 3D Localization Without Ground Truth

New AI Methods Help Machines Understand Legal Text Better

Datasets and Models Used to Analyze Legal Documents

Improving Legal Document Labeling by Comparing Similar Sentences

How Neighborhood Data Improves Legal Document Classification

How AI Can Better Categorize Legal Documents by Learning from Similar Texts

A Coarse-to-Fine Approach to Text-Guided 3D Localization Without Ground Truth

New AI Methods Help Machines Understand Legal Text Better

Datasets and Models Used to Analyze Legal Documents

Improving Legal Document Labeling by Comparing Similar Sentences

How Neighborhood Data Improves Legal Document Classification

How AI Can Better Categorize Legal Documents by Learning from Similar Texts

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps