With rapid development in the field of generative AI, LLMs are becoming an integral part of everyone’s daily life and business operations. They are transforming the way we interact, work, and innovate. Besides their impressive capabilities, these models often require to be trained for specific tasks, datasets, or domains to achieve optimal performance. Fine-tuning helps us train the model on specific tasks and datasets, unlocking their full potential, but it’s a computationally expensive and time-consuming task to perform. As we push the boundaries of AI, there comes a need to develop efficient and cost-effective techniques for fine-tuning, which maximize the model’s performance. In 2023, Hugging Face officially released parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT), an approach that trains the model with a small number of parameters without compromising its performance. PEFT is implemented by various techniques, one of which is Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA), which is an effective way to fine-tune LLMs, balancing efficiency and adaptability. What if you want to use fragmented, multimodal, and frequently contradictory data to reason, predict, and adapt to highly personalized, high-stakes situations in addition to producing fluent language? This was the exact challenge we faced. Our objective was to create a system that could forecast the forecast-ability of intricate physiological or behavioral outcomes ("LLP" = Likelihood Prediction), support those forecasts with multi-source, longitudinal data, provide responsive, emotionally intelligent responses through a lightweight LLM. We didn't fine-tune entire foundation models to accomplish this. Rather, we developed a reasoning agent that is small, scalable, and remarkably human by combining LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation), QLoRA (Quantized LoRA), and some of our own architectural innovations. This post provides a detailed look at that process, including how we constructed the system, the choices we made regarding its architecture, and the modifications that gave it a distinctively personal touch. Problem Statement Given a changing timeline of multimodal inputs, we needed to create a system that could predict how likely a specific event is to happen (like a health issue, a change in behavior, or an environmental cause). Structured logs (daily text + numeric inputs)
Behavioral annotations (what actions a user took in response to recommendations)
Omics-derived biomarkers (microbiome, transcriptome, etc.)
Contextual metadata (mood, cravings, weather, routines) Structured logs (daily text + numeric inputs) Behavioral annotations (what actions a user took in response to recommendations) Omics-derived biomarkers (microbiome, transcriptome, etc.) Contextual metadata (mood, cravings, weather, routines) The model's output had to be: The likelihood score (LLP)
An explanation in plain language of the significance of the score and the rationale behind its assignment The likelihood score (LLP) An explanation in plain language of the significance of the score and the rationale behind its assignment Ideas for the next most effective intervention. Additionally, it needed to be low-latency, resource-efficient, and customizable. The Blueprint for Our Architecture Phase 1: The LLP Core Prediction Model We started by building a transformer-based core model that could take in sequences of structured inputs and output a scalar likelihood score. Our stack included: Input Encoding: Categorical + numerical embeddings, with temporal positional encodings
Model Architecture: Variants of Longformer and TransformerXL for handling long sequences
Training Objective: Predict a continuous outcome from a window of historical states, with labels sourced from clinical/emotional annotations Input Encoding: Categorical + numerical embeddings, with temporal positional encodings Model Architecture: Variants of Longformer and TransformerXL for handling long sequences Training Objective: Predict a continuous outcome from a window of historical states, with labels sourced from clinical/emotional annotations Phase 2: The Conversational LLM Layer The LLP model was only half the solution. Users don’t want scores. They want understanding. We added a conversational LLM layer that: Reads the LLP score
Consumes a summary of the user’s historical timeline
Provides context-aware explanations and suggestions. Reads the LLP score Consumes a summary of the user’s historical timeline Provides context-aware explanations and suggestions. This is where LoRA and QLoRA came in. LoRA: Low-Rank Fine-Tuning for Domain Intelligence We chose LoRA because we didn’t want to touch the entire LLM. Instead, we froze the base model and injected small trainable rank-decomposed matrices into attention layers. How We Used It: Targeted fine-tuning on 3 layers of a 7B model
Trained only 0.1% of parameters (~7M)
Used HuggingFace + PEFT (Parameter Efficient Fine-Tuning) toolkit Custom Innovations:
Introduced synthetic signal tokens: formatted embeddings of structured LLP inputs that could be injected as special tokens into the LLM input stream
Injected mood/goal conditioning prompts: "You are speaking to someone feeling anxious today. Be reassuring and clear." Targeted fine-tuning on 3 layers of a 7B model Trained only 0.1% of parameters (~7M) Used HuggingFace + PEFT (Parameter Efficient Fine-Tuning) toolkit Custom Innovations: Introduced synthetic signal tokens: formatted embeddings of structured LLP inputs that could be injected as special tokens into the LLM input stream Injected mood/goal conditioning prompts: "You are speaking to someone feeling anxious today. Be reassuring and clear." QLoRA: Scaling Fine-Tuning with Quantization To further optimize deployment, we moved to QLoRA, which allowed us to: Quantize the base model to 4-bit (NF4)
Apply LoRA on top of the quantized model
Run training and inference on a single GPU QLoRA enabled us to train a personalized LLM explainer while reducing compute by 60-70% compared to full precision. Quantize the base model to 4-bit (NF4) Apply LoRA on top of the quantized model Run training and inference on a single GPU QLoRA enabled us to train a personalized LLM explainer while reducing compute by 60-70% compared to full precision. This was essential for environments where GPU access is limited. Our Special Tweaks: Beyond Vanilla LoRA/QLoRA Grounded Explanation Engine We built a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipeline that fed symptom or biomarker context into the LLM. These were selected based on similarity search over historical cases (using FAISS), and added as memory tokens.
Latent Feedback Integration We introduced a feedback loop where every user interaction ("That wasn’t helpful", "More like this") was encoded as a reward signal to refine future adapter updates—enabling on-device adaptation without full retraining.
Session-Aware Personalization By analyzing behavioral sequences, we clustered users into healing trajectories and conditioned the LLM output on trajectory class (e.g., "early instability" vs. "stable recovery") using soft prompt injection. Grounded Explanation Engine We built a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipeline that fed symptom or biomarker context into the LLM. These were selected based on similarity search over historical cases (using FAISS), and added as memory tokens. Latent Feedback Integration We introduced a feedback loop where every user interaction ("That wasn’t helpful", "More like this") was encoded as a reward signal to refine future adapter updates—enabling on-device adaptation without full retraining. Session-Aware Personalization By analyzing behavioral sequences, we clustered users into healing trajectories and conditioned the LLM output on trajectory class (e.g., "early instability" vs. "stable recovery") using soft prompt injection. Results LLP core model achieves >0.85 ROC-AUC on internal validation
LLM explainer passes human evaluation for trust, clarity, and tone
Adapter-based updates complete in <2 hours with 4GB GPU
Quantized model fits within <8GB VRAM at runtime LLP core model achieves >0.85 ROC-AUC on internal validation LLM explainer passes human evaluation for trust, clarity, and tone Adapter-based updates complete in <2 hours with 4GB GPU Quantized model fits within <8GB VRAM at runtime Conclusion We believe that this architecture represents a shift from generic chatbots to embedded, explainable, domain-specific reasoning agents. By combining LoRA, QLoRA, transformers, and RAG, we created a scalable, emotionally aware interface between prediction and understanding. In a world where personalization, empathy, and science need to coexist in every interaction—this approach might just be the blueprint for what comes next.

Quant

Chatbot vs AI Agent: The Difference Everyone Talks Around but Rarely Gets Right

I Got Cancer, my Doctors Gave up on my Quality of Life, I Built an AI-app to Help Myself and Others

Read My Stories

Too Long; Didn't Read

Make resilience your competitive advantage

How We Developed a Domain-Specific Prediction Model to Help LLMs Reason Making use of LoRA and QLoRA

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Untitled Story

Guidance, Not Just Data: Redefining Survivor Recovery with AI

Generate and Pray: Using SALLMS to Evaluate the Security of LLM Generated Code: Abstract & Intro

Generate and Pray: Using SALLMS to Evaluate the Security of LLM: Background & Motivation

Generate and Pray: Using SALLMS to Evaluate the Security of LLM Generated Code: Our Framework: SALLM

Generate and Pray: Using SALLMS to Evaluate the Security of LLM Generated Code: Experiments

Guidance, Not Just Data: Redefining Survivor Recovery with AI

Generate and Pray: Using SALLMS to Evaluate the Security of LLM Generated Code: Abstract & Intro

Generate and Pray: Using SALLMS to Evaluate the Security of LLM: Background & Motivation

Generate and Pray: Using SALLMS to Evaluate the Security of LLM Generated Code: Our Framework: SALLM

Generate and Pray: Using SALLMS to Evaluate the Security of LLM Generated Code: Experiments

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps