Table of Links Introduction Related Work 2.1 Semantic Typographic Logo Design 2.2 Generative Model for Computational Design 2.3 Graphic Design Authoring Tool Formative Study 3.1 General Workflow and Challenges 3.2 Concerns in Generative Model Involvement 3.3 Design Space of Semantic Typography Work Design Consideration Typedance and 5.1 Ideation 5.2 Selection 5.3 Generation 5.4 Evaluation 5.5 Iteration Interface Walkthrough and 6.1 Pre-generation stage 6.2 Generation stage 6.3 Post-generation stage Evaluation and 7.1 Baseline Comparison 7.2 User Study 7.3 Results Analysis 7.4 Limitation Discussion 8.1 Personalized Design: Intent-aware Collaboration with AI 8.2 Incorporating Design Knowledge into Creativity Support Tools 8.3 Mix-User Oriented Design Workflow Conclusion and References Introduction Introduction Introduction Related Work 2.1 Semantic Typographic Logo Design 2.2 Generative Model for Computational Design 2.3 Graphic Design Authoring Tool Related Work 2.1 Semantic Typographic Logo Design 2.1 Semantic Typographic Logo Design 2.2 Generative Model for Computational Design 2.2 Generative Model for Computational Design 2.3 Graphic Design Authoring Tool 2.3 Graphic Design Authoring Tool Formative Study 3.1 General Workflow and Challenges 3.2 Concerns in Generative Model Involvement 3.3 Design Space of Semantic Typography Work Formative Study Formative Study 3.1 General Workflow and Challenges 3.1 General Workflow and Challenges 3.2 Concerns in Generative Model Involvement 3.2 Concerns in Generative Model Involvement 3.3 Design Space of Semantic Typography Work 3.3 Design Space of Semantic Typography Work Design Consideration Design Consideration Design Consideration Typedance and 5.1 Ideation 5.2 Selection 5.3 Generation 5.4 Evaluation 5.5 Iteration Typedance and 5.1 Ideation Typedance and 5.1 Ideation 5.2 Selection 5.2 Selection 5.3 Generation 5.3 Generation 5.4 Evaluation 5.4 Evaluation 5.5 Iteration 5.5 Iteration Interface Walkthrough and 6.1 Pre-generation stage 6.2 Generation stage 6.3 Post-generation stage Interface Walkthrough and 6.1 Pre-generation stage Interface Walkthrough and 6.1 Pre-generation stage 6.2 Generation stage 6.2 Generation stage 6.3 Post-generation stage 6.3 Post-generation stage Evaluation and 7.1 Baseline Comparison 7.2 User Study 7.3 Results Analysis 7.4 Limitation Evaluation and 7.1 Baseline Comparison Evaluation and 7.1 Baseline Comparison 7.2 User Study 7.2 User Study 7.3 Results Analysis 7.3 Results Analysis 7.4 Limitation 7.4 Limitation Discussion 8.1 Personalized Design: Intent-aware Collaboration with AI 8.2 Incorporating Design Knowledge into Creativity Support Tools 8.3 Mix-User Oriented Design Workflow Discussion 8.1 Personalized Design: Intent-aware Collaboration with AI 8.1 Personalized Design: Intent-aware Collaboration with AI 8.2 Incorporating Design Knowledge into Creativity Support Tools 8.2 Incorporating Design Knowledge into Creativity Support Tools 8.3 Mix-User Oriented Design Workflow 8.3 Mix-User Oriented Design Workflow Conclusion and References Conclusion and References Conclusion and References 6 INTERFACE WALKTHROUGH 6.1 Pre-generation stage 6.2 Generation stage 6.2.2 Regenerating with appropriate strength. Recognizing the generated result is closer to the typeface, she deletes unwanted results and adjusts the design factor strength to 0.86 using the slider. In the subsequent round, she finds a desirable result and clicks it. The chosen design is then displayed in the central canvas. 6.2.2 Regenerating with appropriate strength. 6.3 Post-generation stage 6.3.1 Evaluating and Refining the generated result. To assess its legibility, Alice navigates to the right side of the canvas and clicks the [Evaluation] button in the EVALUATION. The current position of the result is situated on the imagery side of the slider with a value of 0.55. However, aiming to explore positions more aligned with the typeface side, she drags the slider to the left. After several trials, Alice obtains a series of results, as shown in Fig. 5. 6.3.1 Evaluating and Refining the generated result. Authors: (1) SHISHI XIAO, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou), China; (2) LIANGWEI WANG, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou), China; (3) XIAOJUAN MA, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, China; (4) WEI ZENG, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou), China. Authors: Authors (1) SHISHI XIAO, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou), China; (2) LIANGWEI WANG, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou), China; (3) XIAOJUAN MA, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, China; (4) WEI ZENG, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou), China. This paper is available on arxiv under ATTRIBUTION-NONCOMMERCIAL-SHAREALIKE 4.0 INTERNATIONAL license. This paper is available on arxiv under ATTRIBUTION-NONCOMMERCIAL-SHAREALIKE 4.0 INTERNATIONAL license. available on arxiv available on arxiv