Table of Links Abstract and 1. Introduction Abstract and 1. Introduction 1.1 Background 1.1 Background 1.2 Motivation 1.2 Motivation 1.3 Our Work and Contributions and 1.4 Organization 1.3 Our Work and Contributions and 1.4 Organization Related Work
2.1 Mobile AIGC and Its QoE Modeling
2.2 Blockchain for Mobile Networks


Preliminaries


Prosecutor Design
4.1 Architecture Overview
4.2 Reputation Roll-up
4.3 Duplex Transfer Channel


OS2a: Objective Service Assessment for Mobile AIGC
5.1 Inspiration from DCM
5.2 Objective Quality of the Service Process
5.3 Subjective Experience of AIGC Outputs


OS2A on Prosecutor: Two-Phase Interaction for Mobile AIGC
6.1 MASP Selection by Reputation
6.2 Contract Theoretic Payment Scheme


Implementation and Evaluation
7.1 Implementation and Experimental Setup
7.2 Prosecutor Performance Evaluation
7.3 Investigation of Functional Goals
7.4 Security Analysis


Conclusion and References Related Work
2.1 Mobile AIGC and Its QoE Modeling
2.2 Blockchain for Mobile Networks Related Work 2.1 Mobile AIGC and Its QoE Modeling 2.1 Mobile AIGC and Its QoE Modeling 2.2 Blockchain for Mobile Networks 2.2 Blockchain for Mobile Networks Preliminaries Preliminaries Preliminaries Prosecutor Design
4.1 Architecture Overview
4.2 Reputation Roll-up
4.3 Duplex Transfer Channel Prosecutor Design 4.1 Architecture Overview 4.1 Architecture Overview 4.2 Reputation Roll-up 4.2 Reputation Roll-up 4.3 Duplex Transfer Channel 4.3 Duplex Transfer Channel OS2a: Objective Service Assessment for Mobile AIGC
5.1 Inspiration from DCM
5.2 Objective Quality of the Service Process
5.3 Subjective Experience of AIGC Outputs OS2a: Objective Service Assessment for Mobile AIGC OS2a: Objective Service Assessment for Mobile AIGC 5.1 Inspiration from DCM 5.1 Inspiration from DCM 5.2 Objective Quality of the Service Process 5.2 Objective Quality of the Service Process 5.3 Subjective Experience of AIGC Outputs 5.3 Subjective Experience of AIGC Outputs OS2A on Prosecutor: Two-Phase Interaction for Mobile AIGC
6.1 MASP Selection by Reputation
6.2 Contract Theoretic Payment Scheme OS2A on Prosecutor: Two-Phase Interaction for Mobile AIGC 6.1 MASP Selection by Reputation 6.1 MASP Selection by Reputation 6.2 Contract Theoretic Payment Scheme 6.2 Contract Theoretic Payment Scheme Implementation and Evaluation
7.1 Implementation and Experimental Setup
7.2 Prosecutor Performance Evaluation
7.3 Investigation of Functional Goals
7.4 Security Analysis Implementation and Evaluation 7.1 Implementation and Experimental Setup 7.1 Implementation and Experimental Setup 7.2 Prosecutor Performance Evaluation 7.2 Prosecutor Performance Evaluation 7.3 Investigation of Functional Goals 7.3 Investigation of Functional Goals 7.4 Security Analysis 7.4 Security Analysis Conclusion and References Conclusion and References Conclusion and References 5.2 Objective Quality of the Service Process The objective quality of the AIGC service process can be evaluated by various KPIs from different perspectives. Service latency is one of the most critical concerns because, 8 given the immature AIGC governance, the currently common practice is that the client who first publishes one AIGC output owns the copyright [46]. Consequently, clients will always expect a service latency as small as possible to prevent similar ideas from being published by other mobile neighbors. Without loss of generality, in this paper, we take AIGC service latency as an example to showcase the OS2AO calculation. 5.2.1 Modeling of Channel Establishment 5.2.1 Modeling of Channel Establishment 5.2.2 Generalization to Other KPIs 5.2.2 Generalization to Other KPIs 5.3 Subjective Experience of AIGC Outputs Besides the objective KPIs, clients also care about whether the generated AIGC outputs can meet their personal requirements, which we coin as the experiences of the AIGC service outcome. Considering the subjectivity in artwork assessment, clients evaluate the AIGC outputs using their own standards and preferences. Nonetheless, regardless of which kind of model is used, the final output should be converted to a boolean judgment, whose value is 0 or 1. Value 1 means that the client receives a satisfying AIGC output. In contrast, value 0 indicates that the received output suffers from flaws, e.g., low resolution, distortion, and mismatched art style. Then, an intuitive way is to average the judgment items from all the clients and calculate the reputation score for every MASP. However, recall that these clients hold different levels of strictness. We should calibrate the judgment from numerous heterogeneous clients and generate a fair overall reputation for each MASP. To reach this goal, we use WMSL [16] to calibrate the judgment, as shown in Algorithm 2. experiences boolean judgment 0 1 Algorithm 2 5.3.1 Local Opinion 5.3.1 Local Opinion 5.3.2 Reference Opinion and Calibration 5.3.2 Reference Opinion and Calibration 5.3.3 Opinion Fusion and Reputation 5.3.3 Opinion Fusion and Reputation 5.3.4 Discussion: Rationale of Reputation 5.3.4 Discussion: Rationale of Reputation Authors:
(1) Yinqiu Liu, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (yinqiu001@e.ntu.edu.sg);
(2) Hongyang Du, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (hongyang001@e.ntu.edu.sg);
(3) Dusit Niyato, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (dniyato@ntu.edu.sg);
(4) Jiawen Kang, School of Automation, Guangdong University of Technology, China (kavinkang@gdut.edu.cn);
(5) Zehui Xiong, Pillar of Information Systems Technology and Design, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore (zehuixiong@sutd.edu.sg);
(6) Abbas Jamalipour, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, University of Sydney, Australia (a.jamalipour@ieee.org);
(7) Xuemin (Sherman) Shen, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Waterloo, Canada (sshen@uwaterloo.ca). Authors: Authors: (1) Yinqiu Liu, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (yinqiu001@e.ntu.edu.sg); (2) Hongyang Du, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (hongyang001@e.ntu.edu.sg); (3) Dusit Niyato, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (dniyato@ntu.edu.sg); (4) Jiawen Kang, School of Automation, Guangdong University of Technology, China (kavinkang@gdut.edu.cn); (5) Zehui Xiong, Pillar of Information Systems Technology and Design, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore (zehuixiong@sutd.edu.sg); (6) Abbas Jamalipour, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, University of Sydney, Australia (a.jamalipour@ieee.org); (7) Xuemin (Sherman) Shen, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Waterloo, Canada (sshen@uwaterloo.ca). This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY 4.0 DEED license. This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY 4.0 DEED license. available on arxiv available on arxiv [3] Data available at http://xblock.pro/#/dataset/14

Part of HackerNoon's growing list of open-source research papers, promoting free access to academic material.

How to Measure the Quality of AIGC Services

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

15 Common Types of Unethical Behavior Found in Open-Source Projects

Mobile AIGC Gets a Security Upgrade with ProSecutor

Protecting AI-Generated Content in Mobile Environments with ProSecutor

Measuring Mobile AIGC Quality Without User Studies or Sensors

Lightweight Blockchain Solutions for Mobile Environments

How ProSecutor Secures Mobile AIGC in Untrusted Networks

15 Common Types of Unethical Behavior Found in Open-Source Projects

Mobile AIGC Gets a Security Upgrade with ProSecutor

Protecting AI-Generated Content in Mobile Environments with ProSecutor

Measuring Mobile AIGC Quality Without User Studies or Sensors

Lightweight Blockchain Solutions for Mobile Environments

How ProSecutor Secures Mobile AIGC in Untrusted Networks

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Minty

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps