An awful headline, I know but it's true. I was curious how the Corona Virus had effected traffic for some of the large media publications in the UK and whilst taking a look at the top 10 news sites, I came across something interesting. Is the BBC using to grab more organic traffic or is it an SEO quick fix for something that has gone unaddressed for years? shady tactics Anyone who juggles clients or who works for a large company knows that there is always work to do. Much of a task schedule is a matter of prioritisation and triage. What's the most important thing, that needs to be done yesterday? Are the BBC using a trick to generate more organic visitors and if so, should the UK national broadcaster be operating in such a manner? So what are BBC News doing to grab hundreds of thousands of extra visitors per month? Ranking The Same Page Twice For Numerous Terms The BBC's server set up, has all of its category pages duplicated and ranking for multiple terms. https: // www.bbc.com /news/ /world https:/ /www.bbc.com/ news/world https: // www.bbc.com /news/ /england https:/ /www.bbc.com/ news/england https: // www.bbc.com /news/ /uk https:/ /www.bbc.com/ news/uk And as far as I can see, it's been like this for a long time. Judging from the number of , it looks like they have tested changing things at various points. 301s shown in the Wayback Machine The duplicated link is canonicalised to the main URL as shown below but still tagged . index The canonical tag doesn't stop them from ranking for some very large keywords. Below Ahrefs shows that the canonicalised version is sitting at position 6 for the keyword today's news (70,000 monthly) in the UK. The same goes for the larger keyword "world news" (222,000 monthly) in position 6. On closer inspection, the BBC are taking up both position #1 and a lower position 5/6 for using this trick/bug/exploit/mistake. thousands of keywords If I was doing SEO for the BBC, would I want to fix an issue that could be generating an extra 8-12% of traffic from all these searches? Probably not. The canonical is supposed to indicate to the search engines, that one page's content is similar to another's and indicate the primary source to be ranked. Maybe when you reach the levels of trust and authority that the BBC.com has, things work differently. As a public service, should the BBC be limiting the choice of the public by taking up two positions via this hack? And can you do the same for your site? The only way to know for sure, is to test. Also by Murrough Foley on Hacker Noon . Also Read: SEO, Data Science & Correlative Analysis For Google Organic Traffic

Google

How the BBC is Duplicating Category Pages and Using Canonical Links

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

11 Ways Your Competitors Can Hit You With Negative SEO Attacks And How To Bolster Your Defenses

🔮Technologically Clairvoyant Edition 8

Does WordPress Canonical Redirect Prevent the "Duplicated Content" Issue?

Grow Your Audience With Rel=canonical

104 Stories To Learn About Marketing Strategy

10 Unforgivable Sins of Growth Marketing

11 Ways Your Competitors Can Hit You With Negative SEO Attacks And How To Bolster Your Defenses

🔮Technologically Clairvoyant Edition 8

Does WordPress Canonical Redirect Prevent the "Duplicated Content" Issue?

Grow Your Audience With Rel=canonical

104 Stories To Learn About Marketing Strategy

10 Unforgivable Sins of Growth Marketing

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Minty

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps