Phil Nash

Developer evangelist for Twilio and Authy. I love writing JavaScript and Ruby. console.log('🍻');

[undefined, null, NaN].sort();

How not to sort an array in JavaScript

Array sorting is one of those things you don’t spend too long thinking about, until it stops working for you. Recently I was working with array of items in JavaScript that were not sorting at all properly and completely messing up an interface. It took me way too long to work out what went wrong so I wanted to share what happened and why it was so weird.

Basic sorting

JavaScript has a
method available on Array objects and running it will probably do what you expect. For example:
const stringArray = ['cat', 'dog', 'ant', 'butterfly'];
// => [ 'ant', 'butterfly', 'cat', 'dog' ]
It’s even pretty good if you’re sorting arrays that might have members that are
. MDN says that “all undefined elements are sorted to the end of the array.”
const stringArrayWithUndefined = [
// => [ 'ant', 'butterfly', 'cat', 'dog', 'zebra', undefined, undefined ]


The first issue you might come across is if you find yourself with an array containing
const stringArrayWithUndefinedAndNull = [
// => [ 'ant', 'butterfly', 'cat', 'dog', null, 'zebra', undefined, undefined ]
Sorting will coerce the
to the string "null" which will appear somewhere in the middle of the alphabet.
Then there are numbers. The default JavaScript sorting algorithm is
to convert all members of an array to strings and then compare their
sequences of UTF-16 code unit values. This works great for arrays of
strings as we’ve already seen, but it breaks down very quickly for
const numberArray = [5, 3, 7, 1];
// => [ 1, 3, 5, 7 ]

const biggerNumberArray = [5, 3, 10, 7, 1];
// => [ 1, 10, 3, 5, 7 ]
In the example above, 10 gets sorted to before 3 because “10” is sorted before “3”.
We can fix this by providing JavaScript a comparison function to use to perform the sort. The function receives two items from the array and it needs to return a numeric value and whether that value is above, below or equal to zero defines how the items are sorted relative to each other. If the return value is less than zero, then the first item is sorted in front of the second, if the value is above zero then the second item is sorted in front of the first. If the return value is 0 then the items stay in the same order with respect to each other.
To sort numbers in ascending order, the comparison function is relatively simple:
const compareNumbers = (a, b) => a - b;
Subtracting the first item from the second one satisfies the requirements above. Using this comparison function with our
from earlier will sort the numbers correctly.
// => [ 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 ]
This still works if you have
elements as they are ignored and sorted to the end.
const numberArrayWithUndefined = [5, undefined, 3, 10, 7, 1];
// => [ 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, undefined ]
causes problems again though.
const numberArrayWithUndefinedAndNull = [5, undefined, 3, null, 10, 7, 1];
// => [ null, 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, undefined ]
This happens because coercing
to a number returns 0.
// => 0
You could handle this in your
function or be happy that it is consistent.

Inconsistent gotchas

The biggest problem, and this caught me out recently, comes when
sneaks in another way. As we’ve seen, if the array contains
it’s ignored and just sorted to the back. However, if you are sorting objects where the keys may be
this automatic sorting doesn’t happen and the results become inconsistent.
For example, if you have an array of objects where some of them have values and some don’t, trying to sort by that value will not give you the result you want.
const objectArray = [
  { value: 1 },
  { value: 10 },
  { value: 5 },
  { value: 7 },
  { value: 3 }
const compareObjects = (a, b) => a.value - b.value;
// => [ { value: 1 },
//      { value: 10 },
//      {},
//      { value: 3 },
//      { value: 5 },
//      { value: 7 } ]
Subtracting a number from
or subtracting
from a number both return
and since that doesn’t lay on the scale of numbers that
needs from the comparison function the results end up a little strange. In this case, the item that caused the problem stays where it started in the array and the other objects are locally sorted.
There are a few ways around this, but the important thing is knowing that it can happen. In my case when I came across this, I filtered out the items that didn’t have a value as they weren’t important until they did.
  .filter(obj => typeof obj.value !== 'undefined')
// => [ { value: 1 },
//      { value: 3 },
//      { value: 5 },
//      { value: 7 },
//      { value: 10 } ]

Beware sorting

The upshot of all of this is that the sort function is not as straightforward as it might seem. Strings work, numbers need some input and while undefined is handled as a primitive you have to keep an eye on coercing
s or
object values.
Have you come across problems sorting in JavaScript or other languages? I’d love to hear your stories too, so give me a shout on Twitter at @philnash.



September 3rd, 2019

Hey, @philnash.

Great article. I was linked to it by an O’Reilly newsletter.

How not to sort an array in JavaScript

“Array sorting is one of those things you don’t spend too long thinking about, until it stops working for you.” Phil Nash explores just one of these cases, showing you what went wrong and how to fix it.

Anyway, I noticed an issue in the const numberArrayWithUndefined code block. The variable changes and the comment is not correct.


September 3rd, 2019

Hey @steve9, thanks! And that’s pretty cool I got into the newsletter.

:man_facepalming: on the code mistake though. I’ve fixed it all up now, thank you so much.

September 5th, 2019

Hi @philnash ,
Thanks for the article. I thought sort just work like that. I never actually tried this.

More by Phil Nash

Topics of interest