How an 8B Open Model Sets New Standards for Safe and Efficient Vision-Language AI

Table of Links Abstract and 1 Introduction Abstract and 1 Introduction 2 Terminology 2 Terminology 3 Exploring the design space of vision-language models and 3.1 Are all pre-trained backbones equivalent for VLMs? 3 Exploring the design space of vision-language models and 3.1 Are all pre-trained backbones equivalent for VLMs? 3.2 How does the fully autoregressive architecture compare to the cross-attention architecture? 3.2 How does the fully autoregressive architecture compare to the cross-attention architecture? 3.3 Where are the efficiency gains? 3.3 Where are the efficiency gains? 3.4 How can one trade compute for performance? 3.4 How can one trade compute for performance? 4 Idefics2 - an open state-of-the-art vision-language foundation model and 4.1 Multi-stage pre-training 4 Idefics2 - an open state-of-the-art vision-language foundation model and 4.1 Multi-stage pre-training 4.2 Instruction fine-tuning and 4.3 Optimizing for chat scenarios 4.2 Instruction fine-tuning and 4.3 Optimizing for chat scenarios 5 Conclusion, Acknowledgement, and References 5 Conclusion, Acknowledgement, and References A Appendix A Appendix A.1 Further experimental details of the ablations A.1 Further experimental details of the ablations A.2 Details of the instruction fine-tuning A.2 Details of the instruction fine-tuning A.3 Details of the evaluations A.3 Details of the evaluations A.4 Red-teaming A.4 Red-teaming 5 Conclusion In this work, we re-examine common choices made in the VLM literature and rigorously compare these choices in controlled experiments. Our findings touch upon the effectiveness of different architectures, their performance/inference cost trade-offs as well as training stability. With these learnings at hand, we train Idefics2, an open 8B parameters vision-language model. Idefics2 is state-of-the-art on various benchmarks in its category size and is much more efficient at inference. By releasing our findings, as well as our models and our training dataset, we aim to contribute to the ongoing evolution of VLMs and their applications in solving complex real-world problems. Acknowledgement We thank Mustafa Shukor for helpful suggestions on the paper, and Yacine Jernite, Sasha Luccioni, Margaret Mitchell, Giada Pistilli, Lucie-Aimée Kaffee, and Jack Kumar for red-teaming the model. References Acharya, M., K. Kafle, and C. Kanan (2019). Tallyqa: Answering complex counting questions. In AAAI. Agrawal, H., K. Desai, Y. Wang, X. Chen, R. Jain, M. Johnson, D. Batra, D. Parikh, S. Lee, and P. Anderson (2019, October). nocaps: novel object captioning at scale. In 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). IEEE. Alayrac, J.-B., J. Donahue, P. Luc, A. Miech, I. Barr, Y. Hasson, K. Lenc, A. Mensch, K. Millican, M. Reynolds, R. Ring, E. Rutherford, S. Cabi, T. Han, Z. Gong, S. Samangooei, M. Monteiro, J. L. Menick, S. Borgeaud, A. Brock, A. Nematzadeh, S. Sharifzadeh, M. a. Binkowski, R. Barreira, ´ O. Vinyals, A. Zisserman, and K. Simonyan (2022). Flamingo: a visual language model for few-shot learning. In S. Koyejo, S. Mohamed, A. Agarwal, D. Belgrave, K. Cho, and A. Oh (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Volume 35, pp. 23716–23736. Curran Associates, Inc. Antol, S., A. Agrawal, J. Lu, M. Mitchell, D. Batra, C. L. Zitnick, and D. Parikh (2015). VQA: Visual Question Answering. In International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). Awadalla, A., I. Gao, J. Gardner, J. Hessel, Y. Hanafy, W. Zhu, K. Marathe, Y. Bitton, S. Gadre, S. Sagawa, J. Jitsev, S. Kornblith, P. W. Koh, G. Ilharco, M. Wortsman, and L. Schmidt (2023). Openflamingo: An open-source framework for training large autoregressive vision-language models. Bach, S., V. Sanh, Z. X. Yong, A. Webson, C. Raffel, N. V. Nayak, A. Sharma, T. Kim, M. S. Bari, T. Fevry, Z. Alyafeai, M. Dey, A. Santilli, Z. Sun, S. Ben-david, C. Xu, G. Chhablani, H. Wang, J. Fries, M. Al-shaibani, S. Sharma, U. Thakker, K. Almubarak, X. Tang, D. Radev, M. T.-j. Jiang, and A. Rush (2022, May). PromptSource: An integrated development environment and repository for natural language prompts. In V. Basile, Z. Kozareva, and S. Stajner (Eds.), Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations, Dublin, Ireland, pp. 93–104. Association for Computational Linguistics. Bai, J., S. Bai, S. Yang, S. Wang, S. Tan, P. Wang, J. Lin, C. Zhou, and J. Zhou (2023). Qwen-vl: A versatile vision-language model for understanding, localization, text reading, and beyond. Bavishi, R., E. Elsen, C. Hawthorne, M. Nye, A. Odena, A. Somani, and S. Ta¸sırlar (2023). Introducing our multimodal models. Belouadi, J., A. Lauscher, and S. Eger (2024). Automatikz: Text-guided synthesis of scientific vector graphics with tikz. Biten, A. F., R. Tito, L. Gomez, E. Valveny, and D. Karatzas (2022). Ocr-idl: Ocr annotations for industry document library dataset. Biten, A. F., R. Tito, A. Mafla, L. Gomez, M. Rusiñol, C. Jawahar, E. Valveny, and D. Karatzas (2019). Scene text visual question answering. In 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pp. 4290–4300. Blecher, L., G. Cucurull, T. Scialom, and R. Stojnic (2023). Nougat: Neural optical understanding for academic documents. Brown, T., B. Mann, N. Ryder, M. Subbiah, J. D. Kaplan, P. Dhariwal, A. Neelakantan, P. Shyam, G. Sastry, A. Askell, S. Agarwal, A. Herbert-Voss, G. Krueger, T. Henighan, R. Child, A. Ramesh, D. Ziegler, J. Wu, C. Winter, C. Hesse, M. Chen, E. Sigler, M. Litwin, S. Gray, B. Chess, J. Clark, C. Berner, S. McCandlish, A. Radford, I. Sutskever, and D. Amodei (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. In H. Larochelle, M. Ranzato, R. Hadsell, M. Balcan, and H. Lin (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Volume 33, pp. 1877–1901. Curran Associates, Inc. Carbune, V., H. Mansoor, F. Liu, R. Aralikatte, G. Baechler, J. Chen, and A. Sharma (2024). Chartbased reasoning: Transferring capabilities from llms to vlms. Chang, S., D. Palzer, J. Li, E. Fosler-Lussier, and N. Xiao (2022). MapQA: A dataset for question answering on choropleth maps. In NeurIPS 2022 First Table Representation Workshop. Changpinyo, S., P. Sharma, N. Ding, and R. Soricut (2021). Conceptual 12M: Pushing web-scale image-text pre-training to recognize long-tail visual concepts. In CVPR. Chen, L., J. Li, X. Dong, P. Zhang, C. He, J. Wang, F. Zhao, and D. Lin (2023). Sharegpt4v: Improving large multi-modal models with better captions. Chen, X., J. Djolonga, P. Padlewski, B. Mustafa, S. Changpinyo, J. Wu, C. R. Ruiz, S. Goodman, X. Wang, Y. Tay, S. Shakeri, M. Dehghani, D. Salz, M. Lucic, M. Tschannen, A. Nagrani, H. Hu, M. Joshi, B. Pang, C. Montgomery, P. Pietrzyk, M. Ritter, A. Piergiovanni, M. Minderer, F. Pavetic, A. Waters, G. Li, I. Alabdulmohsin, L. Beyer, J. Amelot, K. Lee, A. P. Steiner, Y. Li, D. Keysers, A. Arnab, Y. Xu, K. Rong, A. Kolesnikov, M. Seyedhosseini, A. Angelova, X. Zhai, N. Houlsby, and R. Soricut (2023). Pali-x: On scaling up a multilingual vision and language model. Chen, X. and X. Wang (2022). Pali: Scaling language-image learning in 100+ languages. In Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS). Chen, X., X. Wang, L. Beyer, A. Kolesnikov, J. Wu, P. Voigtlaender, B. Mustafa, S. Goodman, I. Alabdulmohsin, P. Padlewski, D. Salz, X. Xiong, D. Vlasic, F. Pavetic, K. Rong, T. Yu, D. Keysers, X. Zhai, and R. Soricut (2023). Pali-3 vision language models: Smaller, faster, stronger. Chen, Z., W. Chen, C. Smiley, S. Shah, I. Borova, D. Langdon, R. Moussa, M. Beane, T.-H. Huang, B. Routledge, and W. Y. Wang (2021, November). FinQA: A dataset of numerical reasoning over financial data. In M.-F. Moens, X. Huang, L. Specia, and S. W.-t. Yih (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Online and Punta Cana, Dominican Republic, pp. 3697–3711. Association for Computational Linguistics. Cheng, Z., H. Dong, Z. Wang, R. Jia, J. Guo, Y. Gao, S. Han, J.-G. Lou, and D. Zhang (2022, May). HiTab: A hierarchical table dataset for question answering and natural language generation. In S. Muresan, P. Nakov, and A. Villavicencio (Eds.), Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), Dublin, Ireland, pp. 1094–1110. Association for Computational Linguistics. Chu, X., L. Qiao, X. Zhang, S. Xu, F. Wei, Y. Yang, X. Sun, Y. Hu, X. Lin, B. Zhang, and C. Shen (2024). Mobilevlm v2: Faster and stronger baseline for vision language model. Conover, M., M. Hayes, A. Mathur, J. Xie, J. Wan, S. Shah, A. Ghodsi, P. Wendell, M. Zaharia, and R. Xin (2023). Free dolly: Introducing the world’s first truly open instruction-tuned llm. https://www.databricks.com/blog/2023/04/12/ dolly-first-open-commercially-viable-instruction-tuned-llm. Accessed: 2023- 06-30. Dai, W., J. Li, D. Li, A. Tiong, J. Zhao, W. Wang, B. Li, P. Fung, and S. Hoi (2023). InstructBLIP: Towards general-purpose vision-language models with instruction tuning. In Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Darcet, T., M. Oquab, J. Mairal, and P. Bojanowski (2024). Vision transformers need registers. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations. Dehghani, M., J. Djolonga, B. Mustafa, P. Padlewski, J. Heek, J. Gilmer, A. P. Steiner, M. Caron, R. Geirhos, I. Alabdulmohsin, R. Jenatton, L. Beyer, M. Tschannen, A. Arnab, X. Wang, C. Riquelme Ruiz, M. Minderer, J. Puigcerver, U. Evci, M. Kumar, S. V. Steenkiste, G. F. Elsayed, A. Mahendran, F. Yu, A. Oliver, F. Huot, J. Bastings, M. Collier, A. A. Gritsenko, V. Birodkar, C. N. Vasconcelos, Y. Tay, T. Mensink, A. Kolesnikov, F. Pavetic, D. Tran, T. Kipf, M. Lucic, X. Zhai, D. Keysers, J. J. Harmsen, and N. Houlsby (2023, 23–29 Jul). Scaling vision transformers to 22 billion parameters. In A. Krause, E. Brunskill, K. Cho, B. Engelhardt, S. Sabato, and J. Scarlett (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning, Volume 202 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pp. 7480–7512. PMLR. Dehghani, M., B. Mustafa, J. Djolonga, J. Heek, M. Minderer, M. Caron, A. P. Steiner, J. Puigcerver, R. Geirhos, I. Alabdulmohsin, A. Oliver, P. Padlewski, A. A. Gritsenko, M. Lucic, and N. Houlsby (2023). Patch n’ pack: Navit, a vision transformer for any aspect ratio and resolution. In Thirtyseventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Deng, J., W. Dong, R. Socher, L.-J. Li, K. Li, and L. Fei-Fei (2009). Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 248–255. Desai, K., G. Kaul, Z. Aysola, and J. Johnson (2021). Redcaps: Web-curated image-text data created by the people, for the people. In J. Vanschoren and S. Yeung (Eds.), Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems Track on Datasets and Benchmarks, Volume 1. Curran. Driess, D., F. Xia, M. S. M. Sajjadi, C. Lynch, A. Chowdhery, B. Ichter, A. Wahid, J. Tompson, Q. Vuong, T. Yu, W. Huang, Y. Chebotar, P. Sermanet, D. Duckworth, S. Levine, V. Vanhoucke, K. Hausman, M. Toussaint, K. Greff, A. Zeng, I. Mordatch, and P. Florence (2023). Palm-e: an embodied multimodal language model. In Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML’23. JMLR.org. Gao, P., R. Zhang, C. Liu, L. Qiu, S. Huang, W. Lin, S. Zhao, S. Geng, Z. Lin, P. Jin, K. Zhang, W. Shao, C. Xu, C. He, J. He, H. Shao, P. Lu, H. Li, and Y. Qiao (2024). Sphinx-x: Scaling data and parameters for a family of multi-modal large language models. Google (2023). Gemini: A family of highly capable multimodal models. Google (2024a). Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of context. Google (2024b). Gemma: Open models based on gemini research and technology. Goyal, Y., T. Khot, D. Summers-Stay, D. Batra, and D. Parikh (2017). Making the v in vqa matter: Elevating the role of image understanding in visual question answering. In 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 6325–6334. He, X., Y. Zhang, L. Mou, E. Xing, and P. Xie (2020). Pathvqa: 30000+ questions for medical visual question answering. Hendrycks, D., C. Burns, S. Basart, A. Zou, M. Mazeika, D. Song, and J. Steinhardt (2021). Measuring massive multitask language understanding. In International Conference on Learning Representations. Hong, W., W. Wang, Q. Lv, J. Xu, W. Yu, J. Ji, Y. Wang, Z. Wang, Y. Zhang, J. Li, B. Xu, Y. Dong, M. Ding, and J. Tang (2023). Cogagent: A visual language model for gui agents. Hu, A., H. Xu, J. Ye, M. Yan, L. Zhang, B. Zhang, C. Li, J. Zhang, Q. Jin, F. Huang, and J. Zhou (2024). mplug-docowl 1.5: Unified structure learning for ocr-free document understanding. Hu, E. J., yelong shen, P. Wallis, Z. Allen-Zhu, Y. Li, S. Wang, L. Wang, and W. Chen (2022). LoRA: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. In International Conference on Learning Representations. Huang, S., L. Dong, W. Wang, Y. Hao, S. Singhal, S. Ma, T. Lv, L. Cui, O. K. Mohammed, B. Patra, Q. Liu, K. Aggarwal, Z. Chi, J. Bjorck, V. Chaudhary, S. Som, X. Song, and F. Wei (2023). Language is not all you need: Aligning perception with language models. In Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Hudson, D. A. and C. D. Manning (2019). Gqa: A new dataset for real-world visual reasoning and compositional question answering. In 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 6693–6702. Iyyer, M., W.-t. Yih, and M.-W. Chang (2017, July). Search-based neural structured learning for sequential question answering. In R. Barzilay and M.-Y. Kan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), Vancouver, Canada, pp. 1821–1831. Association for Computational Linguistics. Jaegle, A., F. Gimeno, A. Brock, O. Vinyals, A. Zisserman, and J. Carreira (2021, 18–24 Jul). Perceiver: General perception with iterative attention. In M. Meila and T. Zhang (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, Volume 139 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pp. 4651–4664. PMLR. Jain, N., P. yeh Chiang, Y. Wen, J. Kirchenbauer, H.-M. Chu, G. Somepalli, B. R. Bartoldson, B. Kailkhura, A. Schwarzschild, A. Saha, M. Goldblum, J. Geiping, and T. Goldstein (2024). NEFTune: Noisy embeddings improve instruction finetuning. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations. Jhamtani, H. et al. (2018, October-November). Learning to describe differences between pairs of similar images. In E. Riloff, D. Chiang, J. Hockenmaier, and J. Tsujii (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Brussels, Belgium, pp. 4024–4034. Association for Computational Linguistics. Jiang, A. Q., A. Sablayrolles, A. Mensch, C. Bamford, D. S. Chaplot, D. de las Casas, F. Bressand, G. Lengyel, G. Lample, L. Saulnier, L. R. Lavaud, M.-A. Lachaux, P. Stock, T. L. Scao, T. Lavril, T. Wang, T. Lacroix, and W. E. Sayed (2023). Mistral 7b. Johnson, J., B. Hariharan, L. van der Maaten, L. Fei-Fei, C. L. Zitnick, and R. Girshick (2017). Clevr: A diagnostic dataset for compositional language and elementary visual reasoning. In 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 1988–1997. Kafle, K., S. Cohen, B. Price, and C. Kanan (2018). Dvqa: Understanding data visualizations via question answering. In CVPR. Kahou, S. E., V. Michalski, A. Atkinson, A. Kadar, A. Trischler, and Y. Bengio (2018). Figureqa: An annotated figure dataset for visual reasoning. Karamcheti, S., S. Nair, A. Balakrishna, P. Liang, T. Kollar, and D. Sadigh (2024). Prismatic vlms: Investigating the design space of visually-conditioned language models. Kazemi, M., H. Alvari, A. Anand, J. Wu, X. Chen, and R. Soricut (2024). Geomverse: A systematic evaluation of large models for geometric reasoning. In Synthetic Data for Computer Vision Workshop @ CVPR 2024. Kembhavi, A., M. Salvato, E. Kolve, M. Seo, H. Hajishirzi, and A. Farhadi (2016). A diagram is worth a dozen images. In B. Leibe, J. Matas, N. Sebe, and M. Welling (Eds.), Computer Vision – ECCV 2016, Cham, pp. 235–251. Springer International Publishing. Kembhavi, A., M. Seo, D. Schwenk, J. Choi, A. Farhadi, and H. Hajishirzi (2017). Are you smarter than a sixth grader? textbook question answering for multimodal machine comprehension. In 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 5376–5384. Kiela, D., H. Firooz, A. Mohan, V. Goswami, A. Singh, P. Ringshia, and D. Testuggine (2020). The hateful memes challenge: Detecting hate speech in multimodal memes. In H. Larochelle, M. Ranzato, R. Hadsell, M. Balcan, and H. Lin (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Volume 33, pp. 2611–2624. Curran Associates, Inc. Kingma, D. and J. Ba (2015). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), San Diega, CA, USA. Koh, J. Y., R. Salakhutdinov, and D. Fried (2023). Grounding language models to images for multimodal inputs and outputs. Lau, J., S. Gayen, A. Ben Abacha, and D. Demner-Fushman (2018, 11). A dataset of clinically generated visual questions and answers about radiology images. Scientific Data 5, 180251. Laurençon, H., L. Saulnier, T. Wang, C. Akiki, A. Villanova del Moral, T. Le Scao, L. Von Werra, C. Mou, E. González Ponferrada, H. Nguyen, J. Frohberg, M. Šaško, Q. Lhoest, A. McMillanMajor, G. Dupont, S. Biderman, A. Rogers, L. Ben allal, F. De Toni, G. Pistilli, O. Nguyen, S. Nikpoor, M. Masoud, P. Colombo, J. de la Rosa, P. Villegas, T. Thrush, S. Longpre, S. Nagel, L. Weber, M. Muñoz, J. Zhu, D. Van Strien, Z. Alyafeai, K. Almubarak, M. C. Vu, I. GonzalezDios, A. Soroa, K. Lo, M. Dey, P. Ortiz Suarez, A. Gokaslan, S. Bose, D. Adelani, L. Phan, H. Tran, I. Yu, S. Pai, J. Chim, V. Lepercq, S. Ilic, M. Mitchell, S. A. Luccioni, and Y. Jernite (2022). The bigscience roots corpus: A 1.6tb composite multilingual dataset. In S. Koyejo, S. Mohamed, A. Agarwal, D. Belgrave, K. Cho, and A. Oh (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Volume 35, pp. 31809–31826. Curran Associates, Inc. Laurençon, H., L. Saulnier, L. Tronchon, S. Bekman, A. Singh, A. Lozhkov, T. Wang, S. Karamcheti, A. M. Rush, D. Kiela, M. Cord, and V. Sanh (2023). OBELICS: An open web-scale filtered dataset of interleaved image-text documents. In Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track. Laurençon, H., L. Tronchon, and V. Sanh (2024). Unlocking the conversion of web screenshots into html code with the websight dataset. Lee, B.-K., B. Park, C. W. Kim, and Y. M. Ro (2024). Moai: Mixture of all intelligence for large language and vision models. Lee, K., M. Joshi, I. Turc, H. Hu, F. Liu, J. Eisenschlos, U. Khandelwal, P. Shaw, M.-W. Chang, and K. Toutanova (2023). Pix2struct: screenshot parsing as pretraining for visual language understanding. In Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML’23. JMLR.org. Li, B., R. Wang, G. Wang, Y. Ge, Y. Ge, and Y. Shan (2023). Seed-bench: Benchmarking multimodal llms with generative comprehension. Li, B., Y. Zhang, L. Chen, J. Wang, F. Pu, J. Yang, C. Li, and Z. Liu (2023). Mimic-it: Multi-modal in-context instruction tuning. Li, G., H. A. A. K. Hammoud, H. Itani, D. Khizbullin, and B. Ghanem (2023). CAMEL: Communicative agents for ”mind” exploration of large language model society. In Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Li, J., D. Li, S. Savarese, and S. Hoi (2023). Blip-2: bootstrapping language-image pre-training with frozen image encoders and large language models. In Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML’23. JMLR.org. Li, J., D. Li, C. Xiong, and S. Hoi (2022). Blip: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training for unified vision-language understanding and generation. In ICML. Li, L., Y. Yin, S. Li, L. Chen, P. Wang, S. Ren, M. Li, Y. Yang, J. Xu, X. Sun, L. Kong, and Q. Liu (2023). M3 it: A large-scale dataset towards multi-modal multilingual instruction tuning. Li, Y., Y. Du, K. Zhou, J. Wang, X. Zhao, and J.-R. Wen (2023, December). Evaluating object hallucination in large vision-language models. In H. Bouamor, J. Pino, and K. Bali (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Singapore, pp. 292–305. Association for Computational Linguistics. Li, Y., Y. Zhang, C. Wang, Z. Zhong, Y. Chen, R. Chu, S. Liu, and J. Jia (2024). Mini-gemini: Mining the potential of multi-modality vision language models. Li, Z., B. Yang, Q. Liu, Z. Ma, S. Zhang, J. Yang, Y. Sun, Y. Liu, and X. Bai (2024). Monkey: Image resolution and text label are important things for large multi-modal models. Lin, B., Z. Tang, Y. Ye, J. Cui, B. Zhu, P. Jin, J. Huang, J. Zhang, M. Ning, and L. Yuan (2024). Moe-llava: Mixture of experts for large vision-language models. Lin, J., H. Yin, W. Ping, Y. Lu, P. Molchanov, A. Tao, H. Mao, J. Kautz, M. Shoeybi, and S. Han (2024). Vila: On pre-training for visual language models. Lin, T.-Y., M. Maire, S. Belongie, J. Hays, P. Perona, D. Ramanan, P. Dollár, and C. L. Zitnick (2014). Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. In D. Fleet, T. Pajdla, B. Schiele, and T. Tuytelaars (Eds.), Computer Vision – ECCV 2014, Cham, pp. 740–755. Springer International Publishing. Lin, Z., C. Liu, R. Zhang, P. Gao, L. Qiu, H. Xiao, H. Qiu, C. Lin, W. Shao, K. Chen, J. Han, S. Huang, Y. Zhang, X. He, H. Li, and Y. Qiao (2023). Sphinx: The joint mixing of weights, tasks, and visual embeddings for multi-modal large language models. Lindström, A. D. (2022). Clevr-math: A dataset for compositional language, visual, and mathematical reasoning. Liu, F., G. Emerson, and N. Collier (2023). Visual spatial reasoning. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 11, 635–651. Liu, H., C. Li, Y. Li, and Y. J. Lee (2023). Improved baselines with visual instruction tuning. In NeurIPS 2023 Workshop on Instruction Tuning and Instruction Following. Liu, H., C. Li, Y. Li, B. Li, Y. Zhang, S. Shen, and Y. J. Lee (2024, January). Llava-next: Improved reasoning, ocr, and world knowledge. Liu, H., C. Li, Q. Wu, and Y. J. Lee (2023). Visual instruction tuning. In Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Liu, H., Q. You, X. Han, Y. Wang, B. Zhai, Y. Liu, Y. Tao, H. Huang, R. He, and H. Yang (2024). Infimm-hd: A leap forward in high-resolution multimodal understanding. Liu, S.-Y., C.-Y. Wang, H. Yin, P. Molchanov, Y.-C. F. Wang, K.-T. Cheng, and M.-H. Chen (2024). Dora: Weight-decomposed low-rank adaptation. Liu, T. and B. K. H. Low (2023). Goat: Fine-tuned llama outperforms gpt-4 on arithmetic tasks. Liu, Y., H. Duan, Y. Zhang, B. Li, S. Zhang, W. Zhao, Y. Yuan, J. Wang, C. He, Z. Liu, K. Chen, and D. Lin (2023). Mmbench: Is your multi-modal model an all-around player? Lu, H., W. Liu, B. Zhang, B. Wang, K. Dong, B. Liu, J. Sun, T. Ren, Z. Li, H. Yang, Y. Sun, C. Deng, H. Xu, Z. Xie, and C. Ruan (2024). Deepseek-vl: Towards real-world vision-language understanding. Lu, J., C. Clark, S. Lee, Z. Zhang, S. Khosla, R. Marten, D. Hoiem, and A. Kembhavi (2023). Unified-io 2: Scaling autoregressive multimodal models with vision, language, audio, and action. Lu, P., H. Bansal, T. Xia, J. Liu, C. Li, H. Hajishirzi, H. Cheng, K.-W. Chang, M. Galley, and J. Gao (2024). Mathvista: Evaluating mathematical reasoning of foundation models in visual contexts. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR). Lu, P., R. Gong, S. Jiang, L. Qiu, S. Huang, X. Liang, and S.-C. Zhu (2021). Inter-gps: Interpretable geometry problem solving with formal language and symbolic reasoning. In The Joint Conference of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (ACL-IJCNLP 2021). Lu, P., S. Mishra, T. Xia, L. Qiu, K.-W. Chang, S.-C. Zhu, O. Tafjord, P. Clark, and A. Kalyan (2022). Learn to explain: Multimodal reasoning via thought chains for science question answering. In S. Koyejo, S. Mohamed, A. Agarwal, D. Belgrave, K. Cho, and A. Oh (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Volume 35, pp. 2507–2521. Curran Associates, Inc. Lu, P., L. Qiu, K.-W. Chang, Y. N. Wu, S.-C. Zhu, T. Rajpurohit, P. Clark, and A. Kalyan (2023). Dynamic prompt learning via policy gradient for semi-structured mathematical reasoning. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR). Lu, P., L. Qiu, J. Chen, T. Xia, Y. Zhao, W. Zhang, Z. Yu, X. Liang, and S.-C. Zhu (2021). Iconqa: A new benchmark for abstract diagram understanding and visual language reasoning. In The 35th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) Track on Datasets and Benchmarks. Mañas, O., P. Rodriguez Lopez, S. Ahmadi, A. Nematzadeh, Y. Goyal, and A. Agrawal (2023, May). MAPL: Parameter-efficient adaptation of unimodal pre-trained models for vision-language few-shot prompting. In A. Vlachos and I. Augenstein (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Dubrovnik, Croatia, pp. 2523–2548. Association for Computational Linguistics. Marino, K., M. Rastegari, A. Farhadi, and R. Mottaghi (2019). Ok-vqa: A visual question answering benchmark requiring external knowledge. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Marti, U.-V. and H. Bunke (2002, 11). The iam-database: An english sentence database for offline handwriting recognition. International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition 5, 39–46. Masry, A., D. Long, J. Q. Tan, S. Joty, and E. Hoque (2022, May). ChartQA: A benchmark for question answering about charts with visual and logical reasoning. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2022, Dublin, Ireland, pp. 2263–2279. Association for Computational Linguistics. Mathew, M., V. Bagal, R. Tito, D. Karatzas, E. Valveny, and C. V. Jawahar (2022). Infographicvqa. In 2022 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), pp. 2582–2591. Mathew, M., D. Karatzas, and C. V. Jawahar (2021). Docvqa: A dataset for vqa on document images. In 2021 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), pp. 2199–2208. McKinzie, B., Z. Gan, J.-P. Fauconnier, S. Dodge, B. Zhang, P. Dufter, D. Shah, X. Du, F. Peng, F. Weers, A. Belyi, H. Zhang, K. Singh, D. Kang, A. Jain, H. Hè, M. Schwarzer, T. Gunter, X. Kong, A. Zhang, J. Wang, C. Wang, N. Du, T. Lei, S. Wiseman, G. Yin, M. Lee, Z. Wang, R. Pang, P. Grasch, A. Toshev, and Y. Yang (2024). Mm1: Methods, analysis & insights from multimodal llm pre-training. Methani, N., P. Ganguly, M. M. Khapra, and P. Kumar (2020, March). Plotqa: Reasoning over scientific plots. In The IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV). Mishra, A., S. Shekhar, A. K. Singh, and A. Chakraborty (2019). Ocr-vqa: Visual question answering by reading text in images. In 2019 International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), pp. 947–952. Mitra, A., H. Khanpour, C. Rosset, and A. Awadallah (2024). Orca-math: Unlocking the potential of slms in grade school math. Obeid, J. and E. Hoque (2020, December). Chart-to-text: Generating natural language descriptions for charts by adapting the transformer model. In B. Davis, Y. Graham, J. Kelleher, and Y. Sripada (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Natural Language Generation, Dublin, Ireland, pp. 138–147. Association for Computational Linguistics. OpenAI (2024). Gpt-4 technical report. Pasupat, P. and P. Liang (2015, July). Compositional semantic parsing on semi-structured tables. In C. Zong and M. Strube (Eds.), Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), Beijing, China, pp. 1470–1480. Association for Computational Linguistics. Penedo, G., Q. Malartic, D. Hesslow, R. Cojocaru, H. Alobeidli, A. Cappelli, B. Pannier, E. Almazrouei, and J. Launay (2023). The refinedweb dataset for falcon LLM: Outperforming curated corpora with web data only. In Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track. Pont-Tuset, J., J. Uijlings, S. Changpinyo, R. Soricut, and V. Ferrari (2020). Connecting vision and language with localized narratives. In A. Vedaldi, H. Bischof, T. Brox, and J.-M. Frahm (Eds.), Computer Vision – ECCV 2020, Cham, pp. 647–664. Springer International Publishing. Radford, A., J. W. Kim, C. Hallacy, A. Ramesh, G. Goh, S. Agarwal, G. Sastry, A. Askell, P. Mishkin, J. Clark, G. Krueger, and I. Sutskever (2021). Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In International Conference on Machine Learning. Ren, M., R. Kiros, and R. Zemel (2015). Exploring models and data for image question answering. In C. Cortes, N. Lawrence, D. Lee, M. Sugiyama, and R. Garnett (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Volume 28. Curran Associates, Inc. Sanh, V., A. Webson, C. Raffel, S. Bach, L. Sutawika, Z. Alyafeai, A. Chaffin, A. Stiegler, A. Raja, M. Dey, M. S. Bari, C. Xu, U. Thakker, S. S. Sharma, E. Szczechla, T. Kim, G. Chhablani, N. Nayak, D. Datta, J. Chang, M. T.-J. Jiang, H. Wang, M. Manica, S. Shen, Z. X. Yong, H. Pandey, R. Bawden, T. Wang, T. Neeraj, J. Rozen, A. Sharma, A. Santilli, T. Fevry, J. A. Fries, R. Teehan, T. L. Scao, S. Biderman, L. Gao, T. Wolf, and A. M. Rush (2022). Multitask prompted training enables zero-shot task generalization. In International Conference on Learning Representations. Schuhmann, C., R. Beaumont, R. Vencu, C. Gordon, R. Wightman, M. Cherti, T. Coombes, A. Katta, C. Mullis, M. Wortsman, P. Schramowski, S. Kundurthy, K. Crowson, L. Schmidt, R. Kaczmarczyk, and J. Jitsev (2022). Laion-5b: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text models. In S. Koyejo, S. Mohamed, A. Agarwal, D. Belgrave, K. Cho, and A. Oh (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Volume 35, pp. 25278–25294. Curran Associates, Inc. Schuhmann, C., R. Vencu, R. Beaumont, R. Kaczmarczyk, C. Mullis, A. Katta, T. Coombes, J. Jitsev, and A. Komatsuzaki (2021). Laion-400m: Open dataset of clip-filtered 400 million image-text pairs. Schwenk, D., A. Khandelwal, C. Clark, K. Marino, and R. Mottaghi (2022). A-okvqa: A benchmark for visual question answering using world knowledge. In Computer Vision – ECCV 2022: 17th European Conference, Tel Aviv, Israel, October 23–27, 2022, Proceedings, Part VIII, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 146–162. Springer-Verlag. Sharma, P., N. Ding, S. Goodman, and R. Soricut (2018). Conceptual captions: A cleaned, hypernymed, image alt-text dataset for automatic image captioning. In Proceedings of ACL. Shayegani, E., Y. Dong, and N. Abu-Ghazaleh (2024). Jailbreak in pieces: Compositional adversarial attacks on multi-modal language models. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations. Shukor, M., C. Dancette, and M. Cord (2023, oct). ep-alm: Efficient perceptual augmentation of language models. In 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Los Alamitos, CA, USA, pp. 21999–22012. IEEE Computer Society. Sidorov, O., R. Hu, M. Rohrbach, and A. Singh (2020). Textcaps: A dataset for image captioning with reading comprehension. In A. Vedaldi, H. Bischof, T. Brox, and J.-M. Frahm (Eds.), Computer Vision – ECCV 2020, Cham, pp. 742–758. Springer International Publishing. Singh, A., R. Hu, V. Goswami, G. Couairon, W. Galuba, M. Rohrbach, and D. Kiela (2022). Flava: A foundational language and vision alignment model. In 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 15617–15629. Singh, A., V. Natarjan, M. Shah, Y. Jiang, X. Chen, D. Parikh, and M. Rohrbach (2019). Towards vqa models that can read. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 8317–8326. Srinivasan, K., K. Raman, J. Chen, M. Bendersky, and M. Najork (2021). Wit: Wikipedia-based image text dataset for multimodal multilingual machine learning. In Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR ’21, New York, NY, USA, pp. 2443–2449. Association for Computing Machinery. Suhr, A., S. Zhou, A. Zhang, I. Zhang, H. Bai, and Y. Artzi (2019, July). A corpus for reasoning about natural language grounded in photographs. In A. Korhonen, D. Traum, and L. Màrquez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Florence, Italy, pp. 6418–6428. Association for Computational Linguistics. Sun, Q., Y. Cui, X. Zhang, F. Zhang, Q. Yu, Z. Luo, Y. Wang, Y. Rao, J. Liu, T. Huang, and X. Wang (2023). Generative multimodal models are in-context learners. Sun, Q., Y. Fang, L. Wu, X. Wang, and Y. Cao (2023). Eva-clip: Improved training techniques for clip at scale. Sun, Z., S. Shen, S. Cao, H. Liu, C. Li, Y. Shen, C. Gan, L.-Y. Gui, Y.-X. Wang, Y. Yang, K. Keutzer, and T. Darrell (2023). Aligning large multimodal models with factually augmented rlhf. Tanaka, R., K. Nishida, and S. Yoshida (2021). Visualmrc: Machine reading comprehension on document images. In AAAI. Tang, B. J., A. Boggust, and A. Satyanarayan (2023). VisText: A Benchmark for Semantically Rich Chart Captioning. In The Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). Teknium (2023). Openhermes 2.5: An open dataset of synthetic data for generalist llm assistants. Thiel, D. (2023). Identifying and eliminating csam in generative ml training data and models. Touvron, H., T. Lavril, G. Izacard, X. Martinet, M.-A. Lachaux, T. Lacroix, B. Rozière, N. Goyal, E. Hambro, F. Azhar, A. Rodriguez, A. Joulin, E. Grave, and G. Lample (2023). Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. Touvron, H., L. Martin, K. Stone, P. Albert, A. Almahairi, Y. Babaei, N. Bashlykov, S. Batra, P. Bhargava, S. Bhosale, D. Bikel, L. Blecher, C. C. Ferrer, M. Chen, G. Cucurull, D. Esiobu, J. Fernandes, J. Fu, W. Fu, B. Fuller, C. Gao, V. Goswami, N. Goyal, A. Hartshorn, S. Hosseini, R. Hou, H. Inan, M. Kardas, V. Kerkez, M. Khabsa, I. Kloumann, A. Korenev, P. S. Koura, M.-A. Lachaux, T. Lavril, J. Lee, D. Liskovich, Y. Lu, Y. Mao, X. Martinet, T. Mihaylov, P. Mishra, I. Molybog, Y. Nie, A. Poulton, J. Reizenstein, R. Rungta, K. Saladi, A. Schelten, R. Silva, E. M. Smith, R. Subramanian, X. E. Tan, B. Tang, R. Taylor, A. Williams, J. X. Kuan, P. Xu, Z. Yan, I. Zarov, Y. Zhang, A. Fan, M. Kambadur, S. Narang, A. Rodriguez, R. Stojnic, S. Edunov, and T. Scialom (2023). Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models. Vallaeys, T., M. Shukor, M. Cord, and J. Verbeek (2024). Improved baselines for data-efficient perceptual augmentation of llms. Wang, B., G. Li, X. Zhou, Z. Chen, T. Grossman, and Y. Li (2021). Screen2words: Automatic mobile ui summarization with multimodal learning. In The 34th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST ’21, New York, NY, USA, pp. 498–510. Association for Computing Machinery. Wang, W., Q. Lv, W. Yu, W. Hong, J. Qi, Y. Wang, J. Ji, Z. Yang, L. Zhao, X. Song, J. Xu, B. Xu, J. Li, Y. Dong, M. Ding, and J. Tang (2024). Cogvlm: Visual expert for pretrained language models. Wei, J., M. Bosma, V. Zhao, K. Guu, A. W. Yu, B. Lester, N. Du, A. M. Dai, and Q. V. Le (2022). Finetuned language models are zero-shot learners. In International Conference on Learning Representations. Xiao, J., Z. Xu, A. Yuille, S. Yan, and B. Wang (2024). Palm2-vadapter: Progressively aligned language model makes a strong vision-language adapter. oung, P., A. Lai, M. Hodosh, and J. Hockenmaier (2014). From image descriptions to visual denotations: New similarity metrics for semantic inference over event descriptions. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 2, 67–78. Yu, L., W. Jiang, H. Shi, J. YU, Z. Liu, Y. Zhang, J. Kwok, Z. Li, A. Weller, and W. Liu (2024). Metamath: Bootstrap your own mathematical questions for large language models. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations. Yue, X., Y. Ni, K. Zhang, T. Zheng, R. Liu, G. Zhang, S. Stevens, D. Jiang, W. Ren, Y. Sun, C. Wei, B. Yu, R. Yuan, R. Sun, M. Yin, B. Zheng, Z. Yang, Y. Liu, W. Huang, H. Sun, Y. Su, and W. Chen (2024). Mmmu: A massive multi-discipline multimodal understanding and reasoning benchmark for expert agi. In Proceedings of CVPR. Yue, X., X. Qu, G. Zhang, Y. Fu, W. Huang, H. Sun, Y. Su, and W. Chen (2024). MAmmoTH: Building math generalist models through hybrid instruction tuning. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations. Zhai, X., B. Mustafa, A. Kolesnikov, and L. Beyer (2023). Sigmoid loss for language image pre-training. Zhang, C., F. Gao, B. Jia, Y. Zhu, and S.-C. Zhu (2019). Raven: A dataset for relational and analogical visual reasoning. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Zhang, X., C. Wu, Z. Zhao, W. Lin, Y. Zhang, Y. Wang, and W. Xie (2023). Pmc-vqa: Visual instruction tuning for medical visual question answering. Zhao, Y., Y. Li, C. Li, and R. Zhang (2022, May). MultiHiertt: Numerical reasoning over multi hierarchical tabular and textual data. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), Dublin, Ireland, pp. 6588–6600. Association for Computational Linguistics. Zhao, Y., C. Zhao, L. Nan, Z. Qi, W. Zhang, X. Tang, B. Mi, and D. Radev (2023, July). RobuT: A systematic study of table QA robustness against human-annotated adversarial perturbations. In A. Rogers, J. Boyd-Graber, and N. Okazaki (Eds.), Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), Toronto, Canada, pp. 6064–6081. Association for Computational Linguistics. Zhong, V., C. Xiong, and R. Socher (2017). Seq2sql: Generating structured queries from natural language using reinforcement learning. Zhou, B., Y. Hu, X. Weng, J. Jia, J. Luo, X. Liu, J. Wu, and L. Huang (2024). Tinyllava: A framework of small-scale large multimodal models. Zhou, C., P. Liu, P. Xu, S. Iyer, J. Sun, Y. Mao, X. Ma, A. Efrat, P. Yu, L. YU, S. Zhang, G. Ghosh, M. Lewis, L. Zettlemoyer, and O. Levy (2023). LIMA: Less is more for alignment. In Thirtyseventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Zhu, F., W. Lei, Y. Huang, C. Wang, S. Zhang, J. Lv, F. Feng, and T.-S. Chua (2021, August). TAT-QA: A question answering benchmark on a hybrid of tabular and textual content in finance. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), Online, pp. 3277–3287. Association for Computational Linguistics. Zhu, W., J. Hessel, A. Awadalla, S. Y. Gadre, J. Dodge, A. Fang, Y. Yu, L. Schmidt, W. Y. Wang, and Y. Choi (2023). Multimodal c4: An open, billion-scale corpus of images interleaved with text. In Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track. Zhu, Y., O. Groth, M. Bernstein, and L. Fei-Fei (2016). Visual7W: Grounded Question Answering in Images. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. A.1 Further experimental details of the ablations A.1.1 Cross-attention vs. fully autoregressive architectures We apply LoRA modules to the LLM for the fully autoregressive architecture and to the crossattention modules and the LLM for the cross-attention architecture. In Figure 4, we report the average performance with respect to the number of steps, the number of images, as well as the number of text tokens. We see an improvement across the board with the fully autoregressive architecture. Comparing the average score with these different axes is essential because the cross-attention architecture feeds a single token per image to the language model, against 64 for the fully autoregressive architecture with perceiver pooling. This implies that for the same training sequence length, the number of images and text tokens is different for the two architectures. Equivalently, the same multimodal document will yield different sequence lengths. Even though we fix the batch size in the comparison, the number of text tokens and number of images grow at different paces under the two architectures. A.1.2 Comparing various vision backbones We present in Table 10 the detailed results of comparing multiple vision backbones. While EVA-CLIP5B performs similarly to SigLIP-SO400M, we emphasize that it has 11 times more parameters. We also noticed in early experiments that TextVQA is the most sensitive benchmark to image resolution, which accounts for the performance increase. A.1.3 Comparing various pooling strategies We compare multiple pooling strategies: a simple linear layer that takes the flattened sequence of vision hidden states and projects it into a shorter sequence of visual tokens, as well as a Mapping Network (Mañas et al., 2023). The perceiver resampler significantly outperforms these two options (see Table 11). We also ablate the number of layers in the perceiver resampler, and find no statistically significant differences when increasing the number of layers, similarly to results from Xiao et al. (2024). We settle on 3 layers out of caution to avoid any potential capacity bottleneck. Finally, we add a 2-layer modality projection MLP on top of the vision encoder hidden states to project the vision hidden dimension to the language model hidden dimension prior to the perceiver resampler. These changes yield better performance as well (see Table 13). A.1.4 Ablations on OCR data We hypothesize that adding PDF documents helps the model learn to read text from images. In Table 7, we compare checkpoints trained with and without OCR documents, along with image resolution increase to ensure that the text is legible. We do not observe statistically significant differences when evaluating checkpoints in zero or few shot. Instead, we fine-tune the checkpoints on DocVQA for 500 steps with a learning rate of 1e − 5, leading to checkpoints showing much stronger differences. A.2 Details of the instruction fine-tuning A.2.1 Statistics of The Cauldron In Table 14, we present the statistics of the datasets included in The Cauldron, as well as the text-only instruction datasets used for the supervised fine-tuning. For each dataset, we give the number of different images it contains, the number of question-answer pairs, the total number of tokens for the answers in the question-answer pairs, and the selected percentage of tokens it represents in our final mixture after upsampling or downsampling. Table 14: The statistics of datasets used for instruction fine-tuning. # tokens is the total number of tokens for each dataset for the answers only. % mixture is our selected percentage of answer tokens for each dataset in the final mixture. A.3 Details of the evaluations A.3.1 Evaluation setup We perform all evaluations with a batch size of 1 and greedy decoding. For the multi-choice questions in MMMU, MathVista, MMBench, we evaluate with the same prompt used for similar types of datasets during the instruction fine-tuning: For the open-ended questions in TextVQA, DocVQA, and VQAv2, we evaluate with the prompt: We use the stop words Question, User, and to stop a generation. A.3.2 Expanded evaluation table We report the expanded evaluation of Idefics2 and the comparison to other models in Table 15. This includes scores on VQAv2 (Goyal et al., 2017), which is widely adopted for evaluation. We acknowledge, though, that the metric used for the open-ended visual question answering benchmarks strongly penalizes models that do not generate in the same format as the ground truth. For example, answering "large" when the ground truth is "big" or more verbose reformulations will be counted as incorrect. Our manual qualitative analysis reveals that on benchmarks like VQAv2, the generations of two models differing by 5 points would be barely noticeable. This problem is less concerning for other open-ended benchmarks like TextVQA or DocVQA which require finding a text in an image, making the expected answer less prone to ambiguity. A.3.3 Qualitative evaluation We show in Figures 5, 6, and 7, examples of generations with Idefics2-chatty. A.4 Red-teaming In the context of a red-teaming exercise, our objective is to evaluate the propensity of the model to generate inaccurate, biased, or offensive responses. We evaluate more specifically the chat-optimized checkpoint[12]. While the model typically refrains from responding to offensive inputs, we observe that through repeated trials or guided interactions, it tends to hastily form judgments in situations necessitating nuanced contextual understanding, often perpetuating harmful stereotypes. Noteworthy instances include: • Speculating or passing judgments, or perpetuating historical disparities on individuals’ professions, social status, or insurance eligibility based solely on visual cues (e.g., age, attire, gender, facial expressions). • Generating content that promotes online harassment or offensive memes reinforcing harmful associations from a portrait, or from a benign image. • Assuming emotional states or mental conditions based on outward appearances. • Evaluating individuals’ attractiveness solely based on their visual appearance. Additionally, we identify behaviors that increase security risks that already exist: • Successfully solving CAPTCHAs featuring distorted text within images. • Developing phishing schemes from screenshots of legitimate websites to deceive users into divulging their credentials. • Crafting step-by-step guides on constructing small-scale explosives using readily available chemicals from common supermarkets or manipulating firearms to do maximum damage. It’s important to note that these security concerns are currently limited by the model’s occasional inability to accurately read text within images. We emphasize that the model would often encourage the user to exercise caution about the model’s generation or flag how problematic the initial query can be in the first place. For instance, when insistently prompted to write a racist comment, the model would answer that query before pointing out "This type of stereotyping and dehumanization has been used throughout history to justify discrimination and oppression against people of color. By making light of such a serious issue, this meme perpetuates harmful stereotypes and contributes to the ongoing struggle for racial equality and social justice.". "This type of stereotyping and dehumanization has been used throughout history to justify discrimination and oppression against people of color. By making light of such a serious issue, this meme perpetuates harmful stereotypes and contributes to the ongoing struggle for racial equality and social justice.". However, certain formulations can circumvent (i.e. "jailbreak") these cautionary prompts, emphasizing the need for critical thinking and discretion when engaging with the model’s outputs. While jail-breaking text LLMs is an active research area, jail-breaking vision-language models have recently emerged as a new challenge as vision-language models become more capable and prominent (Shayegani et al., 2024). The addition of the vision modality not only introduces new avenues for injecting malicious prompts but also raises questions about the interaction between vision and language vulnerabilities. Authors: (1) Hugo Laurençon, Hugging Face and Sorbonne Université, (the order was chosen randomly); (2) Léo Tronchon, Hugging Face (the order was chosen randomly); (3) Matthieu Cord, 2Sorbonne Université; (4) Victor Sanh, Hugging Face. Authors: Authors: (1) Hugo Laurençon, Hugging Face and Sorbonne Université, (the order was chosen randomly); (2) Léo Tronchon, Hugging Face (the order was chosen randomly); (3) Matthieu Cord, 2Sorbonne Université; (4) Victor Sanh, Hugging Face. This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY 4.0 DEED license. This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY 4.0 DEED license. available on arxiv available on arxiv [10] https://huggingface.co/datasets/Kamizuru00/diagram_image_to_text [11] https://huggingface.co/datasets/AtlasUnified/atlas-math-sets [12] https://huggingface.co/HuggingFaceM4/idefics2-8b-chatty