Us technology geeks can be blinded by the fun and awesomeness of technology, but sometimes we can take it for granted and it can frankly be inappropriate, particularly when we try to solve problems of people who are not technology geeks.
Last weekend an Early Childhood Development (ECD) Hackathon was organised in Cape Town, and boy was I ready to go, even if it meant bringing my own small child along with a babysitter! Between my two small children experience and love for technology, this was right up my alley! I had roped in a couple of awesome friends with skills including ECD, science, education, coding, monitoring and evaluation, neuroscience and a good dose of enthusiasm to tackle the challenge of access to good nutrition, responsive care and stimulations through play for vulnerable children, as described in the pitch video for the hackathon (included here because it’s so good)
Then life happened, and I couldn’t go. My disappointment was immense, but I had to get over it and instead, I avidly followed the #ECDHack hashtag on twitter over the weekend, as I was otherwise occupied.
Then, the winner was announced. Crèche Connect — TripAdvisor for crèches. And my heart sank.
But why? Everyone in the room was pretty much unanimously in favour of them and they won by a long stretch. I have tried to educate myself about the project as much as I could, and I believe I’ve gotten the same amount of information as the judges when they chose it, since the pitch was filmed and made available publicly on Facebook (thank you for sharing — really!).
So the idea of TripAdvisor for creches. Why does that bother me so much? Firstly, a disclaimer: I think it’s a cool idea by itself, and by all means go for it. And I may not know everything about it, since I wasn’t at the event.
But I also think it completely defeats the point of the hackathon. Does it address the issue of access to good nutrition, responsive care and play for vulnerable children? I don’t think so. Let me explain.
So while I am the first to believe in technology’s transformative powers, I also believe that we need to step outside our preconceptions, and get the very people who we are trying to ‘help’ (what a patronizing word, sometimes) to guide us as to how best we put all that shiny tech of ours to use to service their needs.
Technology needs to adapt to people, not the other way around. If we want technology to contribute to something, it needs to be invisible and ubiquitous. That’s the only way it’ll not create a group of haves and have-nots.
A stark warning is given in this report of the World Economic Forum and describes how:
“The available evidence presents a paradox where ICTs are driving economic growth and decreasing global inequality while, at the same time, contributing to rising within-country income inequality” — Dr. Robert Pepper
While I’m the biggest fan of the enthusiasm that such events generates and the collective generosity of all the participants and sponsors being genuinely concerned with vulnerable children’s development, unfortunately, I see Crèche Connect as a well-meaning but somehwat misinformed output. In other words, an example of potentially missing the target and ‘driving growth while contributing to rising in-country inequality’…
Having said all that, going for crèches is an excellent idea, because so many children spend so much time there, so it’s a great starting point, I fully acknowledge that.
I also acknowledge how much heart the team put into their project.
I just hope it goes the right way from here and becomes much more that ‘TripAdvisor for crèches’!…
Hacker Noon is how hackers start their afternoons. We’re a part of the @AMIfamily. We are now accepting submissions and happy to discuss advertising & sponsorship opportunities.
To learn more, read our about page, like/message us on Facebook, or simply, tweet/DM @HackerNoon.
If you enjoyed this story, we recommend reading our latest tech stories and trending tech stories. Until next time, don’t take the realities of the world for granted!
Create your free account to unlock your custom reading experience.