Parag Agrawal, Vijaya Gadde, and Ned Segal v. Twitter, Inc. Court Filing by Friedlander & Gorris, P.A., April 10, 2023 is part of . You can jump to any part in this filing . This is part 5 of 10. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here Featured Image Generated Using Kadinsky 2 Using the Following Prompt: “lawyer going over legal documents in their office”. VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR ADVANCEMENT Plaintiffs Parag Agrawal, Vijaya Gadde, and Ned Segal (Plaintiffs), by and through their undersigned attorneys, upon knowledge as to themselves and their own actions and upon information and belief as to all other matters, allege as follows: FACTUAL BACKGROUND The Indemnification Agreements Require Advancement and Indemnification To maintain Plaintiffs services as officers of Twitter, the Company entered into the Agreements with Plaintiffs. The terms of each of Plaintiffs Agreements are substantially similar, and the specific provisions cited herein are identical across Agreements unless otherwise noted. Relevant excerpts are provided from the Agrawal Agreement. Each of the Agreements is governed by Delaware law. The preamble to each Agreement provides that its purpose is to afford indemnification and advancement rights to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law and that the Company is obligating itself to afford such rights to ensure protection of and retain its officers. Section 1 of the Agreements, titled "Indemnity of Indemnitee," sets  forth the Company's obligation to indemnify Plaintiffs "to the fullest extent permitted by law.". This includes indemnification for all "Expenses" - defined to include all reasonable attorneys' fees, retainers, court costs, transcript costs, fees of experts, witness fees, and other obligations in a Proceeding. "Proceeding" is broadly defined to include "any threatened, pending or completed action, suit ... investigation, inquiry, administrative hearing or any other actual, threatened or completed proceeding, whether brought by or in the right of the Company or otherwise and whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, in which Indemnitee was, is or will be involved as a party or otherwise, by reason of the fact that Indemnitee is or was an officer or director of the Company..." Section 5 of the Agreements, titled "Advancement of Expenses," sets forth the Company's advancement obligations. It states in part: Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the Company shall advance all Expenses incurred by or on behalf of Indemnitee in connection with any Proceeding by reason of Indemnitee's Corporate Status within thirty (30) days after the receipt by the Company of a statement or statements from Indemnitee requesting such advance or advances from time to time prior to final disposition of such Proceeding. Such statement or statements shall reasonably evidence the Expenses incurred by Indemnitee and shall include or be preceded or accompanied by an undertaking by or on behalf of Indemnitee to repay any Expenses advanced if it shall ultimately be determined that Indemnitee is not entitled to be indemnified against such Expenses. In connection with the advancement of expenses, the Agreements require an undertaking by an indemnitee to repay any advanced amounts if it is ultimately determined that such indemnitee is not entitled to indemnification. The Agreements further state that if advancement of Expenses is not  timely made pursuant to Section 5, Plaintiffs shall be entitled to an adjudication in an appropriate court of the State of Delaware. In the event any action is brought by Plaintiffs in order to enforce the Agreements, Plaintiffs also are entitled to be paid for any and all Expenses incurred in connection with such action. The Agreements provide that Plaintiffs are not required to incur Expenses associated with enforcing their rights under the Agreements by litigation or other legal action, because the cost and expense thereof would substantially detract from the benefits intended to be extended to Plaintiffs under the Agreements. Continue Reading . Here About We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: This court case No. 2023-0409 retrieved on April 10, 2023, from is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. int.NYT

Hot off the press! This story contains factual information about a recent event.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND - The Indemnification Agreements Require Advancement and Indemnification

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

20% of All General Searches in the U.S. Go Through the Default on User-Downloaded Version of Chrome

The Noonification: Can You Improve Your Mental Health with Psychedelics? (11/28/2022)

The Noonification: How Big Tech Influences Privacy Laws (11/24/2022)

The Noonification: Pick Your Billionaire (11/12/2022)

The Noonification: Can Mankind Survive as an Interplanetary Species? (10/20/2022)

The Noonification: Blockchain Games Suck (12/16/2022)

20% of All General Searches in the U.S. Go Through the Default on User-Downloaded Version of Chrome

The Noonification: Can You Improve Your Mental Health with Psychedelics? (11/28/2022)

The Noonification: How Big Tech Influences Privacy Laws (11/24/2022)

The Noonification: Pick Your Billionaire (11/12/2022)

The Noonification: Can Mankind Survive as an Interplanetary Species? (10/20/2022)

The Noonification: Blockchain Games Suck (12/16/2022)

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Minty

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps