Table of Links Abstract and 1 Introduction Abstract and 1 Introduction 2. Prior conceptualisations of intelligent assistance for programmers 2. Prior conceptualisations of intelligent assistance for programmers 3. A brief overview of large language models for code generation 3. A brief overview of large language models for code generation 4. Commercial programming tools that use large language models 4. Commercial programming tools that use large language models 5. Reliability, safety, and security implications of code-generating AI models 5. Reliability, safety, and security implications of code-generating AI models 6. Usability and design studies of AI-assisted programming 6. Usability and design studies of AI-assisted programming 7. Experience reports and 7.1. Writing effective prompts is hard 7. Experience reports and 7.1. Writing effective prompts is hard 7.2. The activity of programming shifts towards checking and unfamiliar debugging 7.2. The activity of programming shifts towards checking and unfamiliar debugging 7.3. These tools are useful for boilerplate and code reuse 7.3. These tools are useful for boilerplate and code reuse 8. The inadequacy of existing metaphors for AI-assisted programming 8.1. AI assistance as search 8.1. AI assistance as search 8.2. AI assistance as compilation 8.2. AI assistance as compilation 8.3. AI assistance as pair programming 8.3. AI assistance as pair programming 8.4. A distinct way of programming 8.4. A distinct way of programming 9. Issues with application to end-user programming 9. Issues with application to end-user programming 9.1. Issue 1: Intent specification, problem decomposition and computational thinking 9.1. Issue 1: Intent specification, problem decomposition and computational thinking 9.2. Issue 2: Code correctness, quality and (over)confidence 9.2. Issue 2: Code correctness, quality and (over)confidence 9.3. Issue 3: Code comprehension and maintenance 9.3. Issue 3: Code comprehension and maintenance 9.4. Issue 4: Consequences of automation in end-user programming 9.4. Issue 4: Consequences of automation in end-user programming 9.5. Issue 5: No code, and the dilemma of the direct answer 9.5. Issue 5: No code, and the dilemma of the direct answer 10. Conclusion 10. Conclusion A. Experience report sources A. Experience report sources References References 9.5. Issue 5: No code, and the dilemma of the direct answer Finally, it is not a foregone conclusion that users are even interested in code. As Blackwell’s model of attention investment notes, in many cases the user may be content to perform an action manually, rather than invest in creating a reusable automation (Blackwell, 2002a; J. Williams et al., 2020). Spreadsheet users, in particular, are often not sensitive to the level of automation or automatability of a given workflow, using a mix of manual, automated, and semi-automated techniques to achieve the goal at hand (Pandita et al., 2018). Spreadsheet users often need ad-hoc transformations of their data that they will, in all likelihood, never need again. It may be that we can express this transformation as a program, but if the user is interested in the output and not the program, is it important, or even necessary, to communicate this fact to the user? One can argue that increasing the user’s awareness of the flexibility and fallibility of the process of delivering an inferred result (i.e., enabling them to critically evaluate the output (Sarkar et al., 2015)) can build agency, confidence, trust, and resilience. This issue is related to information retrieval’s “dilemma of the direct answer” (Potthast et al., 2021), raised in response to the increased phenomenon of search engines directly answering queries in addition to simply listing retrieved results. However, if the programming language used is not related to the languages familiar to the end-user, or the user is a complete novice, it is exceedingly difficult for them to make any sense of it, as was shown by Lau et al. (2021) in their study of Excel users encountering Python code. Yet, there are socio-technical motivations for using an unfamiliar target language: long-term testing of LLM assistance shows that it shines when paired with high-level APIs that capture use cases well (Section 7). One advantage of the Python ecosystem is that it has an unparalleled set of libraries and APIs for data wrangling. An LLM-assisted tool that emits Excel formulas is therefore less likely to solve user problems than Python statements. In the longer term, this might be mitigated by developing a rich set of data manipulation libraries in the Excel formula language. Authors:
(1) Advait Sarkar, Microsoft Research, University of Cambridge (advait@microsoft.com);
(2) Andrew D. Gordon, Microsoft Research, University of Edinburgh (adg@microsoft.com);
(3) Carina Negreanu, Microsoft Research (cnegreanu@microsoft.com);
(4) Christian Poelitz, Microsoft Research (cpoelitz@microsoft.com);
(5) Sruti Srinivasa Ragavan, Microsoft Research (a-srutis@microsoft.com);
(6) Ben Zorn, Microsoft Research (ben.zorn@microsoft.com). Authors: Authors: (1) Advait Sarkar, Microsoft Research, University of Cambridge (advait@microsoft.com); (2) Andrew D. Gordon, Microsoft Research, University of Edinburgh (adg@microsoft.com); (3) Carina Negreanu, Microsoft Research (cnegreanu@microsoft.com); (4) Christian Poelitz, Microsoft Research (cpoelitz@microsoft.com); (5) Sruti Srinivasa Ragavan, Microsoft Research (a-srutis@microsoft.com); (6) Ben Zorn, Microsoft Research (ben.zorn@microsoft.com). This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED license. This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED license. available on arxiv available on arxiv

Part of HackerNoon's growing list of open-source research papers, promoting free access to academic material.

The Great Transformation: How LLMs Remake Every Programming Activity

The AI Gardener: A New Role For Experts In A World Of Automated Code

Pair Programming AI Agent 

Too Long; Didn't Read

Get Free Unlimited IP Geo Data With IPinfo Lite

Excel vs. Python: How The Target Language Changes Everything For Non-Experts

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

11 Proven Solutions to Common GitHub Copilot Problems

Human-Human vs Human-AI Pair Programming

The Pros and Cons of Pair Programming

What Makes Pair Programming a Success (or a Failure)?

Breaking Down the Human-AI Pair Programming Experience

LLM, Your pAIr Programmer?

11 Proven Solutions to Common GitHub Copilot Problems

Human-Human vs Human-AI Pair Programming

The Pros and Cons of Pair Programming

What Makes Pair Programming a Success (or a Failure)?

Breaking Down the Human-AI Pair Programming Experience

LLM, Your pAIr Programmer?

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps