paint-brush
Discrete Mean Estimates and the Landau-Siegel Zero: Proof of Proposition 2.4by@eigenvalue

Discrete Mean Estimates and the Landau-Siegel Zero: Proof of Proposition 2.4

tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

This section delves into the proof process of Proposition 2.4, leveraging Lemmas 8.1, 5.8, and 8.2, showcasing its importance in Dirichlet L-function theory.
featured image - Discrete Mean Estimates and the Landau-Siegel Zero: Proof of Proposition 2.4
Eigen Value Equation Population  HackerNoon profile picture

Author:

(1) Yitang Zhang.

  1. Abstract & Introduction
  2. Notation and outline of the proof
  3. The set Ψ1
  4. Zeros of L(s, ψ)L(s, χψ) in Ω
  5. Some analytic lemmas
  6. Approximate formula for L(s, ψ)
  7. Mean value formula I
  8. Evaluation of Ξ11
  9. Evaluation of Ξ12
  10. Proof of Proposition 2.4
  11. Proof of Proposition 2.6
  12. Evaluation of Ξ15
  13. Approximation to Ξ14
  14. Mean value formula II
  15. Evaluation of Φ1
  16. Evaluation of Φ2
  17. Evaluation of Φ3
  18. Proof of Proposition 2.5

Appendix A. Some Euler products

Appendix B. Some arithmetic sums

References

10. Proof of Proposition 2.4

The goal of this section is to prove Proposition 2.4. We continue to assume 1 ≤ j ≤ 3.



By Lemma 8.1 we have





The contour of integration is moved in the same way as the proof of Lemma 8.1. Thus, by Lemma 5.8 and 8.2,



This yields (10.8) since the function



Thus, with simple modification, Lemma 10.1 and 10.2 apply to the sums



Noting that



and gathering the above results together we conclude



with



Hence, by Proposition 7.1,







This paper is available on arxiv under CC 4.0 license.