Table of Links Abstract and 1 Introduction Abstract and 1 Introduction 2 Related Work 2 Related Work 3 Model and 3.1 Associative memories 3 Model and 3.1 Associative memories 3.2 Transformer blocks 3.2 Transformer blocks 4 A New Energy Function 4 A New Energy Function 4.1 The layered structure 4.1 The layered structure 5 Cross-Entropy Loss 5 Cross-Entropy Loss 6 Empirical Results and 6.1 Empirical evaluation of the radius 6 Empirical Results and 6.1 Empirical evaluation of the radius 6.2 Training GPT-2 6.2 Training GPT-2 6.3 Training Vanilla Transformers 6.3 Training Vanilla Transformers 7 Conclusion and Acknowledgments 7 Conclusion and Acknowledgments Appendix A. Deferred Tables Appendix A. Deferred Tables Appendix B. Some Properties of the Energy Functions Appendix B. Some Properties of the Energy Functions Appendix C. Deferred Proofs from Section 5 Appendix C. Deferred Proofs from Section 5 Appendix D. Transformer Details: Using GPT-2 as an Example Appendix D. Transformer Details: Using GPT-2 as an Example References References 5 Cross-Entropy Loss We now proceed to analyze the loss of Transformer networks. The cross-entropy loss, which measures the difference between predicted probabilities and actual labels, is commonly used for training Transformer models. The attention mechanism includes a softmax operation that outputs a probability distribution p ∈ ∆n. In practice, the final softmax output is then fed into a task-specific layer for downstream tasks, such as predictions and classifications. Thus, we compare the last softmax output of the transformer blocks with the target distribution. We have the following result regarding the cross-entropy loss. Remark 2 The cross-entropy can be written as Remark 2 The cross-entropy can be written as When the model is severely over-parameterized, the energy function can well approximate the energy of the sample distribution. In this case, the minimal cross-entropy equals the entropy of the training samples. When the model is severely over-parameterized, the energy function can well approximate the energy of the sample distribution. In this case, the minimal cross-entropy equals the entropy of the training samples. Next, we take a closer look at the layer partition function. We have In Table 2 in Appendix A, we compare the reported cross-entropy loss of various transformer-based models in the literature. Usually, a family of models ranging in a variety of sizes is reported, and we select the largest ones. We observe that similar cross-entropy loss is achieved across a wide range of architectural shapes (including depth, width, attention heads, FF dimensions, and context lengths). Nevertheless, the losses all satisfy L > 1. Remark 3 We remark that some models add auxiliary regularization terms such as the z-loss (Chowdhery et al., 2023; Yang et al., 2023) during their training. In these cases, the scaling laws should take into consideration the additional terms. Also, modifications to the transformer blocks, such as additional layer normalization may contribute to the lower bound of the cross-entropy. Remark 3 We remark that some models add auxiliary regularization terms such as the z-loss (Chowdhery et al., 2023; Yang et al., 2023) during their training. In these cases, the scaling laws should take into consideration the additional terms. Also, modifications to the transformer blocks, such as additional layer normalization may contribute to the lower bound of the cross-entropy. Authors:
(1) Xueyan Niu, Theory Laboratory, Central Research Institute, 2012 Laboratories, Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.;
(2) Bo Bai baibo (8@huawei.com);
(3) Lei Deng (deng.lei2@huawei.com);
(4) Wei Han (harvey.hanwei@huawei.com). Authors: Authors: (1) Xueyan Niu, Theory Laboratory, Central Research Institute, 2012 Laboratories, Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.; (2) Bo Bai baibo (8@huawei.com); (3) Lei Deng (deng.lei2@huawei.com); (4) Wei Han (harvey.hanwei@huawei.com). This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED license. This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED license. available on arxiv available on arxiv

Part of HackerNoon's growing list of open-source research papers, promoting free access to academic material.

Empirical

Empirical Results: GPT-2 Analysis of Transformer Memorization & Loss

Modeling Transformer Layers: Majorization Minimization & Hopfield Networks

REINFORCEMENT . tech

Too Long; Didn't Read

Make resilience your competitive advantage

Cross-Entropy Loss Analysis in Transformer Networks

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Untitled Story

How an Open Model and a Pile of Data are Changing Time Series Analysis

Theoretical Framework: Transformer Memorization & Performance Dynamics

Related Work: Scaling Laws and Hopfield Models in LLM Research

Associative Memories: Transformer Memorization & Performance Dynamics

Transformer Block Architecture: Attention and Feed-Forward Integration

How an Open Model and a Pile of Data are Changing Time Series Analysis

Theoretical Framework: Transformer Memorization & Performance Dynamics

Related Work: Scaling Laws and Hopfield Models in LLM Research

Associative Memories: Transformer Memorization & Performance Dynamics

Transformer Block Architecture: Attention and Feed-Forward Integration

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps