Ovrsea

ovrsea

Microsoft v. United States (2016) Court Filing, retrieved on July 14, 2016, is part of . You can jump to any part in this filing . This part is 11 of 22. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here 1. Plain Meaning of the SCA As observed above, the SCA permits the government to require service providers to produce the contents of certain priority stored communications “only pursuant to a warrant issued using the procedures described in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (or, in the case of a State court, issued using State warrant procedures) by a court of competent jurisdiction.”  18 U.S.C. § 2703(a), (b)(1)(a).  The provisions in § 2703 that permit a service provider’s disclosure in response to a duly obtained warrant do not mention any extraterritorial application, and the government points to no provision that even implicitly alludes to any such application.  No relevant definition provided by either Title I or Title II of ECPA, see 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510, 2711, suggests that Congress envisioned any extraterritorial use for the statute. When Congress intends a law to apply extraterritorially, it gives an “affirmative indication” of that intent.  Morrison, 561 U.S. at 265.  It did so, for example, in the statutes at issue in Weiss v. National Westminster Bank PLC, 768 F.3d 202, 207 & n.5 (2d Cir. 2014) (concluding that definition of “international terrorism” within 18 U.S.C. § 2331(1) covers extraterritorial conduct because Congress referred to acts that “occur primarily outside the territorial jurisdiction of the United States”) and United States v. Weingarten, 632 F.3d 60, 65 (2d Cir. 2011) (concluding that 18 U.S.C. § 2423(b) applies to extraterritorial conduct because it criminalizes “travel in foreign commerce undertaken with the intent to commit sexual acts with minors” that would violate United States law had the acts occurred in the jurisdiction of the United States).  We see no such indication in the SCA. We emphasize further that under § 2703, any “court of competent jurisdiction”―defined in § 2711(3)(B) to include “a court of general criminal jurisdiction of a State authorized by the law of that State to issue search warrants”―may issue an SCA warrant.  Section 2703(a) refers directly to the use of State warrant procedures as an adequate basis for issuance of an SCA warrant.  18 U.S.C. § 2703(a).  We think it particularly unlikely that, if Congress intended SCA warrants to apply extraterritorially, it would provide for such far‐reaching state court authority without at least “address[ing] the subject of conflicts with foreign laws and procedures.”  Aramco, 499 U.S. at 256; see also American Ins. Ass’n v. Garamendi, 539 U.S. 396, 413 (2003) (describing as beyond dispute the notion that “state power that touches on foreign relations must yield to the National Government’s policy”). The government asserts that “[n]othing in the SCA’s text, structure, purpose, or legislative history indicates that compelled production of records is limited to those stored domestically.”  Gov’t Br. at 26 (formatting altered and emphasis added).  It emphasizes the requirement placed on a service provider to disclose customers’ data, and the absence of any territorial reference restricting that obligation.  We find this argument unpersuasive:  It stands the presumption against extraterritoriality on its head.  It further reads into the Act an extraterritorial awareness and intention that strike us as anachronistic, and for which we see, and the government points to, no textual or documentary support. [20] [20] Seeking additional grounds for its position that to apply Morrison in this case is to proceed on a false premise, the government argues that the presumption against extraterritoriality applies only to “substantive provisions” of United States law, and that the SCA’s warrant provisions are procedural.  Gov’t Br. at 31.  The proposition that the SCA’s protections are merely procedural might reasonably be questioned.  But even assuming that they are procedural, the government gains no traction with this argument, which we rejected in Loginovskaya v. Batratchenko, 764 F.3d 266, 272‐73 (2d Cir. 2014). Continue Reading . Here About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case No. 15–777 retrieved on September 27, 2023, from is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. cases.justia.com

Who in the US Has the Authority to Issue Warrants for Data Stored Overseas?

Microsoft v. United States (2016) Court Filing, retrieved on July 14, 2016, is part of . You can jump to any part in this filing . This part is 10 of 22. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here C. Whether the SCA’s Warrant Provisions Contemplate Extraterritorial Application We dispose of the first question with relative ease.  The government conceded at oral argument that the warrant provisions of the SCA do not contemplate or permit extraterritorial application.[19] Our review of the statute confirms the soundness of this concession. [19] When asked, “What text in the Stored Communications Act do you point to, to support your assertion that . . . Congress intended extraterritorial application?”, the government responded, “There’s no extraterritorial application here at all.”  Recording of Oral Argument at 1:06:40– 1:07:00.  Later, when Judge Lynch observed, “I take it that suggests that the government actually agrees that there shall not be extraterritorial application of the Stored Communications Act . . . what this dispute is about is about the focus of the statute and what counts as an extraterritorial application of the statute,” the government answered, “That’s right, Judge.”  Id. at 1:25:38– 1:26:05. Continue Reading . Here About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case No. 15–777 retrieved on September 27, 2023, from is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. cases.justia.com

The US Conceded That The Warrant Presented to Microsoft Did Not Apply to Overseas Locations

A Short History of the World, by H. G. Wells, is part of the HackerNoon Books Series. You can jump to any chapter in this book here . THE NEW OVERSEAS EMPIRES OF STEAMSHIP AND RAILWAY THE NEW OVERSEAS EMPIRES OF STEAMSHIP AND RAILWAY The end of the eighteenth century was a period of disrupting empires and disillusioned expansionists. The long and tedious journey between Britain and Spain and their colonies in America prevented any really free coming and going between the home land and the daughter lands, and so the colonies separated into new and distinct communities, with distinctive ideas and interests and even modes of speech. As they grew they strained more and more at the feeble and uncertain link of shipping that had joined them. Weak trading-posts in the wilderness, like those of France in Canada, or trading establishments in great alien communities, like those of Britain in India, might well cling for bare existence to the nation which gave them support and a reason for their existence. That much and no more seemed to many thinkers in the early part of the nineteenth century to be the limit set to overseas rule. In 1820 the sketchy great European “empires” outside of Europe that had figured so bravely in the maps of the middle eighteenth century, had shrunken to very small dimensions. Only the Russian sprawled as large as ever across Asia. The British Empire in 1815 consisted of the thinly populated coastal river and lake regions of Canada, and a great hinterland of wilderness in which the only settlements as yet were the fur-trading stations of the Hudson Bay Company, about a third of the Indian peninsula, under the rule of the East India Company, the coast districts of the Cape of Good Hope inhabited by blacks and rebellious-spirited Dutch settlers; a few trading stations on the coast of West Africa, the rock of Gibraltar, the island of Malta, Jamaica, a few minor slave-labour possessions in the West Indies, British Guiana in South America, and, on the other side of the world, two dumps for convicts at Botany Bay in Australia and in Tasmania. Spain retained Cuba and a few settlements in the Philippine Islands. Portugal had in Africa some vestiges of her ancient claims. Holland had various islands and possessions in the East Indies and Dutch Guiana, and Denmark an island or so in the West Indies. France had one or two West Indian islands and French Guiana. This seemed to be as much as the European powers needed, or were likely to acquire of the rest of the world. Only the East India Company showed any spirit of expansion. While Europe was busy with the Napoleonic wars the East India Company, under a succession of Governors-General, was playing much the same role in India that had been played before by Turkoman and such-like invaders from the north. And after the peace of Vienna it went on, levying its revenues, making wars, sending ambassadors to Asiatic powers, a quasi- independent state, however, with a marked disposition to send wealth westward. We cannot tell here in any detail how the British Company made its way to supremacy sometimes as the ally of this power, sometimes as that, and finally as the conqueror of all. Its power spread to Assam, Sind, Oudh. The map of India began to take on the outlines familiar to the English schoolboy of to-day, a patchwork of native states embraced and held together by the great provinces under direct British rule. . . . In 1859, following upon a serious mutiny of the native troops in India, this empire of the East India Company was annexed to the British Crown. By an Act entitled An Act for the Better Government of India, the Governor-General became a Viceroy representing the Sovereign, and the place of the Company was taken by a Secretary of State for India responsible to the British Parliament. In 1877, Lord Beaconsfield, to complete the work, caused Queen Victoria to be proclaimed Empress of India. Upon these extraordinary lines India and Britain are linked at the present time. India is still the empire of the Great Mogul, but the Great Mogul has been replaced by the “crowned republic” of Great Britain. India is an autocracy without an autocrat. Its rule combines the disadvantage of absolute monarchy with the impersonality and irresponsibility of democratic officialdom. The Indian with a complaint to make has no visible monarch to go to; his Emperor is a golden symbol; he must circulate pamphlets in England or inspire a question in the British House of Commons. The more occupied Parliament is with British affairs, the less attention India will receive, and the more she will be at the mercy of her small group of higher officials. RAILWAY BRIDGE OVER THE GORGE, VICTORIA FALLS, OF THE ZAMBESI, SOUTHERN RHODESIA Photo: British South African Co. Apart from India, there was no great expansion of any European Empire until the railways and the steamships were in effective action. A considerable school of political thinkers in Britain was disposed to regard overseas possessions as a source of weakness to the kingdom. The Australian settlements developed slowly until in 1842 the discovery of valuable copper mines, and in 1851 of gold, gave them a new importance. Improvements in transport were also making Australian wool an increasingly marketable commodity in Europe. Canada, too, was not remarkably progressive until 1849; it was troubled by dissensions between its French and British inhabitants, there were several serious revolts, and it was only in 1867 that a new constitution creating a Federal Dominion of Canada relieved its internal strains. It was the railway that altered the Canadian outlook. It enabled Canada, just as it enabled the United States, to expand westward, to market its corn and other produce in Europe, and in spite of its swift and extensive growth, to remain in language and sympathy and interests one community. The railway, the steamship and the telegraph cable were indeed changing all the conditions of colonial development. Before 1840, English settlements had already begun in New Zealand, and a New Zealand Land Company had been formed to exploit the possibilities of the island. In 1840 New Zealand also was added to the colonial possessions of the British Crown. Canada, as we have noted, was the first of the British possessions to respond richly to the new economic possibilities that the new methods of transport were opening. Presently the republics of South America, and particularly the Argentine Republic, began to feel in their cattle trade and coffee growing the increased nearness of the European market. Hitherto the chief commodities that had attracted the European powers into unsettled and barbaric regions had been gold or other metals, spices, ivory, or slaves. But in the latter quarter of the nineteenth century the increase of the European populations was obliging their governments to look abroad for staple foods; and the growth of scientific industrialism was creating a demand for new raw materials, fats and greases of every kind, rubber, and other hitherto disregarded substances. It was plain that Great Britain and Holland and Portugal were reaping a great and growing commercial advantage from their very considerable control of tropical and sub-tropical products. After 1871 Germany, and presently France and later Italy, began to look for unannexed raw-material areas, or for Oriental countries capable of profitable modernization. So began a fresh scramble all over the world, except in the American region where the Monroe Doctrine now barred such adventures, for politically unprotected lands. Close to Europe was the continent of Africa, full of vaguely known possibilities. In 1850 it was a continent of black mystery; only Egypt and the coast were known. Here we have no space to tell the amazing story of the explorers and adventurers who first pierced the African darkness, and of the political agents, administrators, traders, settlers and scientific men who followed in their track. Wonderful races of men like the pygmies, strange beasts like the okapi, marvellous fruits and flowers and insects, terrible diseases, astounding scenery of forest and mountain, enormous inland seas and gigantic rivers and cascades were revealed; a whole new world. Even remains (at Zimbabwe) of some unrecorded and vanished civilization, the southward enterprise of an early people, were discovered. Into this new world came the Europeans, and found the rifle already there in the hands of the Arab slave-traders, and negro life in disorder. By 1900, in half a century, all Africa was mapped, explored, estimated and divided between the European powers. Little heed was given to the welfare of the natives in this scramble. The Arab slaver was indeed curbed rather than expelled, but the greed for rubber, which was a wild product collected under compulsion by the natives in the Belgian Congo, a greed exacerbated by the clash of inexperienced European administrators with the native population, led to horrible atrocities. No European power has perfectly clean hands in this matter. We cannot tell here in any detail how Great Britain got possession of Egypt in 1883 and remained there in spite of the fact that Egypt was technically a part of the Turkish Empire, nor how nearly this scramble led to war between France and Great Britain in 1898, when a certain Colonel Marchand, crossing Central Africa from the west coast, tried at Fashoda to seize the Upper Nile. Nor can we tell how the British Government first let the Boers, or Dutch settlers, of the Orange River district and the Transvaal set up independent republics in the inland parts of South Africa, and then repented and annexed the Transvaal Republic in 1877; nor how the Transvaal Boers fought for freedom and won it after the battle of Majuba Hill (1881). Majuba Hill was made to rankle in the memory of the English people by a persistent press campaign. A war with both republics broke out in 1899, a three years’ war enormously costly to the British people, which ended at last in the surrender of the two republics. Their period of subjugation was a brief one. In 1907, after the downfall of the imperialist government which had conquered them, the Liberals took the South African problem in hand, and these former republics became free and fairly willing associates with Cape Colony and Natal in a Confederation of all the states of South Africa as one self- governing republic under the British Crown. In a quarter of a century the partition of Africa was completed. There remained unannexed three comparatively small countries: Liberia, a settlement of liberated negro slaves on the west coast; Morocco, under a Moslem Sultan; and Abyssinia, a barbaric country, with an ancient and peculiar form of Christianity, which had successfully maintained its independence against Italy at the battle of Adowa in 1896. About HackerNoon Book Series: We bring you the most important technical, scientific, and insightful public domain books. This book is part of the public domain. H. G. Wells (2011). A Short History of the World. Urbana, Illinois: Project Gutenberg. Retrieved October 2022, from https://www.gutenberg.org/files/11870/11870-h/11870-h.htm This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org , located at https://www.gutenberg.org/policy/license.html .

THE NEW OVERSEAS EMPIRES OF STEAMSHIP AND RAILWAY

A Short History of the World, by H. G. Wells, is part of the HackerNoon Books Series. You can jump to any chapter in this book here . THE NEW EMPIRES OF THE EUROPEANS IN ASIA AND OVERSEAS THE NEW EMPIRES OF THE EUROPEANS IN ASIA AND OVERSEAS While Central Europe thus remained divided and confused, the Western Europeans and particularly the Dutch, the Scandinavians, the Spanish, the Portuguese, the French and the British were extending the area of their struggles across the seas of all the world. The printing press had dissolved the political ideas of Europe into a vast and at first indeterminate fermentation, but that other great innovation, the ocean-going sailing ship, was inexorably extending the range of European experience to the furthermost limits of salt water. The first overseas settlements of the Dutch and Northern Atlantic Europeans were not for colonization but for trade and mining. The Spaniards were first in the field; they claimed dominion over the whole of this new world of America. Very soon however the Portuguese asked for a share. The Pope—it was one of the last acts of Rome as mistress of the world—divided the new continent between these two first-comers, giving Portugal Brazil and everything else east of a line 370 leagues west of the Cape Verde islands, and all the rest to Spain (1494). The Portuguese at this time were also pushing overseas enterprise southward and eastward. In 1497 Vasco da Gama had sailed from Lisbon round the Cape to Zanzibar and then to Calicut in India. In 1515 there were Portuguese ships in Java and the Moluccas, and the Portuguese were setting up and fortifying trading stations round and about the coasts of the Indian Ocean. Mozambique, Goa, and two smaller possessions in India, Macao in China and a part of Timor are to this day Portuguese possessions. The nations excluded from America by the papal settlement paid little heed to the rights of Spain and Portugal. The English, the Danes and Swedes, and presently the Dutch, were soon staking out claims in North America and the West Indies, and his Most Catholic Majesty of France heeded the papal settlement as little as any Protestant. The wars of Europe extended themselves to these claims and possessions. In the long run the English were the most successful in this scramble for overseas possessions. The Danes and Swedes were too deeply entangled in the complicated affairs of Germany to sustain effective expeditions abroad. Sweden was wasted upon the German battlefields by a picturesque king, Gustavus Adolphus, the Protestant “Lion of the North.” The Dutch were the heirs of such small settlements as Sweden made in America, and the Dutch were too near French aggressions to hold their own against the British. In the far East the chief rivals for empire were the British, Dutch and French, and in America the British, French and Spanish. The British had the supreme advantage of a water frontier, the “silver streak” of the English Channel, against Europe. The tradition of the Latin Empire entangled them least. EUROPEANS TIGER HUNTING IN INDIA (From the engraving of the picture by Zoffany in the British Museum) France has always thought too much in terms of Europe. Throughout the eighteenth century she was wasting her opportunities of expansion in West and East alike in order to dominate Spain, Italy and the German confusion. The religious and political dissensions of Britain in the seventeenth century had driven many of the English to seek a permanent home in America. They struck root and increased and multiplied, giving the British a great advantage in the American struggle. In 1756 and 1760 the French lost Canada to the British and their American colonists, and a few years later the British trading company found itself completely dominant over French, Dutch and Portuguese in the peninsula of India. The great Mongol Empire of Baber, Akbar and their successors had now far gone in decay, and the story of its practical capture by a London trading company, the British East India Company, is one of the most extraordinary episodes in the whole history of conquest. THE LAST EFFORT AND FALL OF TIPPOO SULTAN (From the engraving of the picture by Singleton in the British Museum) This East India Company had been originally at the time of its incorporation under Queen Elizabeth no more than a company of sea adventurers. Step by step they had been forced to raise troops and arm their ships. And now this trading company, with its tradition of gain, found itself dealing not merely in spices and dyes and tea and jewels, but in the revenues and territories of princes and the destinies of India. It had come to buy and sell, and it found itself achieving a tremendous piracy. There was no one to challenge its proceedings. Is it any wonder that its captains and commanders and officials, nay, even its clerks and common soldiers, came back to England loaded with spoils? Men under such circumstances, with a great and wealthy land at their mercy, could not determine what they might or might not do. It was a strange land to them, with a strange sunlight; its brown people seemed a different race, outside their range of sympathy; its mysterious temples sustained fantastic standards of behaviour. Englishmen at home were perplexed when presently these generals and officials came back to make dark accusations against each other of extortions and cruelties. Upon Clive Parliament passed a vote of censure. He committed suicide in 1774. In 1788 Warren Hastings, a second great Indian administrator, was impeached and acquitted (1792). It was a strange and unprecedented situation in the world’s history. The English Parliament found itself ruling over a London trading company, which in its turn was dominating an empire far greater and more populous than all the domains of the British crown. To the bulk of the English people India was a remote, fantastic, almost inaccessible land, to which adventurous poor young men went out, to return after many years very rich and very choleric old gentlemen. It was difficult for the English to conceive what the life of these countless brown millions in the eastern sunshine could be. Their imaginations declined the task. India remained romantically unreal. It was impossible for the English, therefore, to exert any effective supervision and control over the company’s proceedings. And while the Western European powers were thus fighting for these fantastic overseas empires upon every ocean in the world, two great land conquests were in progress in Asia. China had thrown off the Mongol yoke in 1360, and flourished under the great native dynasty of the Mings until 1644. Then the Manchus, another Mongol people, reconquered China and remained masters of China until 1912. Meanwhile Russia was pushing East and growing to greatness in the world’s affairs. The rise of this great central power of the old world, which is neither altogether of the East nor altogether of the West, is one of the utmost importance to our human destiny. Its expansion is very largely due to the appearance of a Christian steppe people, the Cossacks, who formed a barrier between the feudal agriculture of Poland and Hungary to the west and the Tartar to the east. The Cossacks were the wild east of Europe, and in many ways not unlike the wild west of the United States in the middle nineteenth century. All who had made Russia too hot to hold them, criminals as well as the persecuted innocent, rebellious serfs, religious secretaries, thieves, vagabonds, murderers, sought asylum in the southern steppes and there made a fresh start and fought for life and freedom against Pole, Russian and Tartar alike. Doubtless fugitives from the Tartars to the east also contributed to the Cossack mixture. Slowly these border folk were incorporated in the Russian imperial service, much as the highland clans of Scotland were converted into regiments by the British government. New lands were offered them in Asia. They became a weapon against the dwindling power of the Mongolian nomads, first in Turkestan and then across Siberia as far as the Amur. The decay of Mongol energy in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries is very difficult to explain. Within two or three centuries from the days of Jengis and Timurlane Central Asia had relapsed from a period of world ascendancy to extreme political impotence. Changes of climate, unrecorded pestilences, infections of a malarial type, may have played their part in this recession—which may be only a temporary recession measured by the scale of universal history—of the Central Asian peoples. Some authorities think that the spread of Buddhist teaching from China also had a pacifying influence upon them. At any rate, by the sixteenth century the Mongol, Tartar and Turkish peoples were no longer pressing outward, but were being invaded, subjugated and pushed back both by Christian Russia in the west and by China in the east. All through the seventeenth century the Cossacks were spreading eastward from European Russia, and settling wherever they found agricultural conditions. Cordons of forts and stations formed a moving frontier to these settlements to the south, where the Turkomans were still strong and active; to the north-east, however, Russia had no frontier until she reached right to the Pacific... About HackerNoon Book Series: We bring you the most important technical, scientific, and insightful public domain books. This book is part of the public domain. H. G. Wells (2011). A Short History of the World. Urbana, Illinois: Project Gutenberg. Retrieved October 2022, from https://www.gutenberg.org/files/11870/11870-h/11870-h.htm This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org , located at https://www.gutenberg.org/policy/license.html .

THE NEW EMPIRES OF THE EUROPEANS IN ASIA AND OVERSEAS

A recent study conducted by Kiseki in the fall of 2024 uncovers a fascinating trend: Japanese singles are increasingly eager to connect with people from around the globe. This shift in social dynamics is noteworthy. Record Numbers of Japanese Living Abroad According to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, a historic high of 570,000 Japanese citizens now reside overseas, the largest figure seen in over 30 years. This surge reflects a vibrant curiosity about diverse cultures, particularly among younger generations, as highlighted by Kiseki's latest research. The survey reveals that over 95% of Japanese singles are enthusiastic about engaging with foreigners. Given Japan’s historically complex attitudes toward international cultures, it’s intriguing to explore what drives this newfound openness. Understanding the Motivations Behind Japan's Singles Delving into the desires of Japanese singles is a complex endeavor. Kiseki, a part of the Social Discovery Group and recognized for its excellence in global matchmaking by the Japan Number One Research Institute LLC, conducted an insightful online survey with over 230 participants from various age brackets. The findings are compelling. A Remarkable 95% Eager to Connect with Foreigners One of the most striking insights from Kiseki’s 2024 survey is that an impressive 95% of respondents express a desire to connect with individuals from other countries. The enthusiasm is nearly equal among men (96%) and women (94%), indicating that this interest transcends gender. Many participants articulated their intentions clearly: while some are in search of love and romance, a significant number prioritize friendship. In fact, 70% are looking to forge friendships through communication, while 29% simply wish for someone to converse with. Language acquisition also plays a crucial role, with 56% eager to practice their speaking skills with others.While friendship and language learning are primary motivators, romance remains an appealing prospect for many. Kiseki reports that 21% of respondents are actively seeking love, with men showing slightly more interest than women. The Rise of International Romance The trend toward international relationships is already gaining momentum in Japan. The survey indicates that 45% of participants have engaged in romantic relationships with foreigners, with women (50%) reporting higher rates than men (36%). Digital platforms are pivotal in fostering these international connections. Kiseki's findings show that 32% have met foreigners online, and 11% have established both online and offline relationships. Younger individuals are particularly inclined to connect digitally, although offline interactions tend to increase with age. When asked about their preferred methods for meeting new people in the future, over 70% expressed a willingness to engage through online platforms or dating sites. Notably, many Japanese singles prefer a gradual approach—favoring casual friendships and language exchanges before diving into romantic pursuits. Kiseki: Bridging Connections Across Borders While there’s a clear enthusiasm among Japanese singles for meeting foreigners, navigating these connections can be challenging. Launched by SDG, Kiseki has become a leading platform for connecting individuals from approximately 80 countries. Kiseki offers seamless communication features such as AI-assisted chat translations, speed matching, and video calls, facilitating meaningful interactions across borders. The platform encourages users to take their time in building friendships and developing online relationships while also serving as a resource for language learning and cultural exploration. Safety is paramount; Kiseki employs rigorous identity and age verification through trusted providers like Liquid, ensuring a secure environment for its users. In conclusion, as Japan’s singles increasingly seek connections beyond their borders, platforms like Kiseki play a vital role in fostering these exciting new relationships—whether they blossom into friendships or romantic partnerships. A recent study conducted by Kiseki in the fall of 2024 uncovers a fascinating trend: Japanese singles are increasingly eager to connect with people from around the globe. This shift in social dynamics is noteworthy. Kiseki Record Numbers of Japanese Living Abroad According to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, a historic high of 570,000 Japanese citizens now reside overseas, the largest figure seen in over 30 years. This surge reflects a vibrant curiosity about diverse cultures, particularly among younger generations, as highlighted by Kiseki's latest research. The survey reveals that over 95% of Japanese singles are enthusiastic about engaging with foreigners. Given Japan’s historically complex attitudes toward international cultures, it’s intriguing to explore what drives this newfound openness. Understanding the Motivations Behind Japan's Singles Delving into the desires of Japanese singles is a complex endeavor. Kiseki, a part of the Social Discovery Group and recognized for its excellence in global matchmaking by the Japan Number One Research Institute LLC, conducted an insightful online survey with over 230 participants from various age brackets. The findings are compelling. Social Discovery Group A Remarkable 95% Eager to Connect with Foreigners One of the most striking insights from Kiseki’s 2024 survey is that an impressive 95% of respondents express a desire to connect with individuals from other countries. The enthusiasm is nearly equal among men (96%) and women (94%), indicating that this interest transcends gender. Many participants articulated their intentions clearly: while some are in search of love and romance, a significant number prioritize friendship. In fact, 70% are looking to forge friendships through communication, while 29% simply wish for someone to converse with. Language acquisition also plays a crucial role, with 56% eager to practice their speaking skills with others.While friendship and language learning are primary motivators, romance remains an appealing prospect for many. Many participants articulated their intentions clearly: while some are in search of love and romance, a significant number prioritize friendship. In fact, 70% are looking to forge friendships through communication, while 29% simply wish for someone to converse with. Language acquisition also plays a crucial role, with 56% eager to practice their speaking skills with others.While friendship and language learning are primary motivators, romance remains an appealing prospect for many. Kiseki reports that 21% of respondents are actively seeking love, with men showing slightly more interest than women. The Rise of International Romance The trend toward international relationships is already gaining momentum in Japan. The survey indicates that 45% of participants have engaged in romantic relationships with foreigners, with women (50%) reporting higher rates than men (36%). Digital platforms are pivotal in fostering these international connections. Kiseki's findings show that 32% have met foreigners online, and 11% have established both online and offline relationships. Younger individuals are particularly inclined to connect digitally, although offline interactions tend to increase with age. When asked about their preferred methods for meeting new people in the future, over 70% expressed a willingness to engage through online platforms or dating sites . Notably, many Japanese singles prefer a gradual approach—favoring casual friendships and language exchanges before diving into romantic pursuits. dating sites Kiseki: Bridging Connections Across Borders While there’s a clear enthusiasm among Japanese singles for meeting foreigners, navigating these connections can be challenging. Launched by SDG , Kiseki has become a leading platform for connecting individuals from approximately 80 countries. Kiseki offers seamless communication features such as AI-assisted chat translations, speed matching, and video calls, facilitating meaningful interactions across borders. The platform encourages users to take their time in building friendships and developing online relationships while also serving as a resource for language learning and cultural exploration. Safety is paramount; Kiseki employs rigorous identity and age verification through trusted providers like Liquid, ensuring a secure environment for its users. SDG In conclusion, as Japan’s singles increasingly seek connections beyond their borders, platforms like Kiseki play a vital role in fostering these exciting new relationships—whether they blossom into friendships or romantic partnerships. In conclusion, as Japan’s singles increasingly seek connections beyond their borders, platforms like Kiseki play a vital role in fostering these exciting new relationships—whether they blossom into friendships or romantic partnerships.

Global Romance Gains Popularity in Japan, Reveals 2024 Survey by Kiseki

Wêreldwye romanse wen gewildheid in Japan, onthul 2024-opname deur Kiseki

Global Romance získává popularitu v Japonsku, odhaluje 2024 průzkum od Kiseki

El romance global gana popularidad en Japón, según una encuesta de Kiseki para 2024

Globalna romantika postaje sve popularnija u Japanu, otkriva Kisekijevo istraživanje iz 2024

Համաշխարհային սիրավեպը ժողովրդականություն է ձեռք բերում Ճապոնիայում, բացահայտում է 2024 թվականի հետազոտությունը Կիսեկիի կողմից

キセキの2024年調査によると、日本でグローバルロマンスの人気が高まっていることが明らかになった。

Global Romance ទទួលបានប្រជាប្រិយភាពនៅក្នុងប្រទេសជប៉ុន បង្ហាញការស្ទង់មតិឆ្នាំ 2024 ដោយ Kiseki

Pasaulinis romanas populiarėja Japonijoje, atskleidžia 2024 m. Kiseki apklausa

Global Romance Yamamaye mu Buyapani, Yerekana 2024 Ubushakashatsi bwakozwe na Kiseki

க்ளோபல் ரொமான்ஸ் ஜப்பானில் பிரபலமாகிறது, கிசெகியின் 2024 கணக்கெடுப்பை வெளிப்படுத்துகிறது

ዓለማዊ ፍቕራዊ ርክብ ኣብ ጃፓን ተፈታውነት ረኺቡ፡ ኣብ 2024 ብኪሰኪ ዝተገብረ መጽናዕቲ ኣቃሊዑ

Kiseki'nin 2024 Anketi, Küresel Romantizmin Japonya'da Popülerlik Kazandığını Açıkladı

Welcome to HackerNoon Writing Prompts! See all other stories published using this template here. To start, tell us a little bit about yourself: I am a results-driven technology leader with over 30 years of experience in driving connectivity and innovation across the Pacific Islands. My passion lies in leveraging emerging technologies to empower communities and bridging the digital divide. As the former CEO of Tonga Cable Limited, I led the deployment of affordable high-speed internet, and as CTO of PowerPlay, I helped develop a blockchain solution for renewable energy. My roles have included expanding satellite internet coverage as Regional, Corporate Development Director at Kacific Broadband Satellites Group and enhancing digital skills through USAID's Digital Connectivity Project. I am now officially retired from corporate life but I remain dedicated to the mission of "Leaving No One Behind" through broadband access. When I'm not building technology, you will find me blogging, mentoring individuals of all ages, advocating for progressive policies, and exploring partnerships that utilize technology responsibly to uplift communities. Describe the life hack(s) you use on a regular basis: How to protect myself from “Inflation” and diminishing value of my local Tongan currency (TOP) “Pa’anga”. Which part of life has it/they helped you with? Soverignity and Financial Independence. Where did you first hear about it/them? 2008/2009 in Suva, Fiji after the release of Satoshi Nakamoto’s “Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System” Whitepaper. Is there a time that stands out to you when not having this would have negatively affected your life? I am a digital nomad and I choose to work on projects with offshore organisations and business contract holders. If I am paid in Fiat? I choose a strong currency like the USD or EUR or AUD depending on the context of the project and I hold offshore accounts to accommodate those transactions. I also have a local account with a local Bank that I only transfer funds to on a need to do basis for everyday transactions here where I choose as home in the Pacific Islands. If I am paid in crypto? I choose Bitcoin (BTC) or a Stablecoin like Tether (USDT). Why do I do this? This is my life’s hack to battling Inflation and the dimishing value of my local currency. I hold funds overseas where their currency is stronger compared to my local currency and also in crypto. With crypto, I’ve learnt a valueable lesson on Trading, I don’t trade since it requires a specialized set of customised skills but if you are not careful you will end up leaning towards gambling. So I don’t trade, I just hold. If I did not have this life’s hack, I would be a slave to Inflation and the dimishing value of my country’s local fiat currency. Who are your favorite motivational speakers, online lecturers, and/or tinkerers? I follow these rock stars in alphabetical order - Alex M. Pawlowski, Anton Golub, Donald Trump, Edward Snowden, Elon Musk, Gary Vaynerchuk, Harry Papacharissiou, Julian Assange, Leemon Baird, Nick Szabo, Nebojsa Todorovic, Patrick Collins, Sadhguru, Satoshi Nakamoto, Sergey Nazarov, used to follow Steve Jobs (RIP), Taha Hussain, Vitalik Buterin. Which podcasts, books, and movies do you like and why? I don’t know what happened but I am no longer a fan of reading fictional material, and due to information overload I stick to reading whitepapers and journals. I watch documentaries, as far as movies are concerned? that drive has also diminshed as well, but I am still a big fan of Star Wars and the Matrix series. Would you like to take a stab at answering some of these questions? The link for the template is HERE, just start writing! Interested in what others had to say in their answers? Click HERE. Interested in reading the content from all of our writing prompts? Click HERE. Welcome to HackerNoon Writing Prompts! See all other stories published using this template here. Welcome to HackerNoon Writing Prompts! See all other stories published using this template here . here here To start, tell us a little bit about yourself: I am a results-driven technology leader with over 30 years of experience in driving connectivity and innovation across the Pacific Islands. My passion lies in leveraging emerging technologies to empower communities and bridging the digital divide. As the former CEO of Tonga Cable Limited, I led the deployment of affordable high-speed internet, and as CTO of PowerPlay, I helped develop a blockchain solution for renewable energy. My roles have included expanding satellite internet coverage as Regional, Corporate Development Director at Kacific Broadband Satellites Group and enhancing digital skills through USAID's Digital Connectivity Project. I am now officially retired from corporate life but I remain dedicated to the mission of "Leaving No One Behind" through broadband access. When I'm not building technology, you will find me blogging, mentoring individuals of all ages, advocating for progressive policies, and exploring partnerships that utilize technology responsibly to uplift communities. Describe the life hack(s) you use on a regular basis: How to protect myself from “Inflation” and diminishing value of my local Tongan currency (TOP) “Pa’anga”. Which part of life has it/they helped you with? Soverignity and Financial Independence. Where did you first hear about it/them? 2008/2009 in Suva, Fiji after the release of Satoshi Nakamoto’s “Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System” Whitepaper. Is there a time that stands out to you when not having this would have negatively affected your life? I am a digital nomad and I choose to work on projects with offshore organisations and business contract holders. If I am paid in Fiat? I choose a strong currency like the USD or EUR or AUD depending on the context of the project and I hold offshore accounts to accommodate those transactions. I also have a local account with a local Bank that I only transfer funds to on a need to do basis for everyday transactions here where I choose as home in the Pacific Islands. If I am paid in crypto? I choose Bitcoin (BTC) or a Stablecoin like Tether (USDT). Why do I do this? This is my life’s hack to battling Inflation and the dimishing value of my local currency. I hold funds overseas where their currency is stronger compared to my local currency and also in crypto. With crypto, I’ve learnt a valueable lesson on Trading, I don’t trade since it requires a specialized set of customised skills but if you are not careful you will end up leaning towards gambling. So I don’t trade, I just hold. If I did not have this life’s hack, I would be a slave to Inflation and the dimishing value of my country’s local fiat currency. Who are your favorite motivational speakers, online lecturers, and/or tinkerers? I follow these rock stars in alphabetical order - Alex M. Pawlowski, Anton Golub, Donald Trump, Edward Snowden, Elon Musk, Gary Vaynerchuk, Harry Papacharissiou, Julian Assange, Leemon Baird, Nick Szabo, Nebojsa Todorovic, Patrick Collins, Sadhguru, Satoshi Nakamoto, Sergey Nazarov, used to follow Steve Jobs (RIP), Taha Hussain, Vitalik Buterin. Which podcasts, books, and movies do you like and why? I don’t know what happened but I am no longer a fan of reading fictional material, and due to information overload I stick to reading whitepapers and journals. I watch documentaries, as far as movies are concerned? that drive has also diminshed as well, but I am still a big fan of Star Wars and the Matrix series. Would you like to take a stab at answering some of these questions? The link for the template is HERE, just start writing! Interested in what others had to say in their answers? Click HERE. Interested in reading the content from all of our writing prompts? Click HERE. Would you like to take a stab at answering some of these questions? The link for the template is HERE , just start writing! Interested in what others had to say in their answers? Click HERE . Interested in reading the content from all of our writing prompts? Click HERE . HERE HERE HERE

Life Hack: RED - Retired, Extremely Dexterous 

Hey Hackers! Cropler has been nominated in HackerNoon's Startups of The Year 2024  awards in Warsaw, Poland under the Emerging Tech category and others. Please vote for us here: 1️⃣ https://hackernoon.com/startups/europe/europe-warsaw-poland 2️⃣ https://hackernoon.com/startups/industry/iot 3️⃣ https://hackernoon.com/startups/industry/hardware 4️⃣ https://hackernoon.com/startups/industry/climatetech Meet Cropler Cropler is the world’s first real-time remote photo plant monitoring technology that is about to become an AI-powered digital agronomical assistant. Cropler uses smart AI-powered mobile agricameras to help farmers and agribusinesses identify the key phenophases, diseases, and inputs efficiently to perform necessary agricultural operations in a timely manner. The Winning Team 1️⃣ Nik Bedunkevich
LinkedIn
Founder & CEO
With over 10 years in software and 7+ years in hardware development, Nik's leadership in precision agriculture, backed by his experience at OneSoil, where he co-founded and led hardware development, has been instrumental. His background in Radio Engineering and his ability to integrate data exchange and soil analysis sensors have enabled Cropler to push the boundaries of AI-driven agricultural solutions.2️⃣ Marie SinkovaLinkedIn
CMO
Marie’s 6+ years in marketing, including her impactful work at MEDvidi and EduDo, have significantly boosted our brand’s visibility. Her ability to develop engaging content and manage successful teams has increased revenue and brand recognition while minimizing negative reviews. Her strategic approach in various marketing areas has laid a solid foundation for Cropler development.3️⃣ Andrii ZbrytskyiLinkedIn
BDM
With over 17 years in the agritech area, Andri Zbrytskyi has witnessed firsthand the ins and outs of clients resulting in better client/corporate relations, sales and even more business development for the company. AI agriculture solutions have found strategic partnerships thanks to his efforts and these have increased expanding the market base.4️⃣ Xenia NiaborskayaLinkedIn
Head of Design
Xenia’s experience of more than 4 years in UX/UI design has played a key role in ensuring that our user interfaces work as expected and look good as well. Her capability in business-centered design and the process of user-centered design has improved the usability of our platform tremendously.5️⃣ Eugene VoronetsLinkedIn
Tech Adviser
Eugene’s 10+ years in backend development, particularly his expertise in high-load systems, ensures the robustness and scalability of our technology. His work at OneSoil, building APIs and fostering collaborations with industry leaders like John Deere and AWS, has played a critical role in shaping Cropler’s technical infrastructure. What Cropler does differently We aim to revolutionize agriculture with Cropler's global plant monitoring technology, which uses AI-powered agricameras and remote sensing data to provide farmers, agronomists, and agribusinesses with predictive field insights and global yield analytics for optimized crop production. Cropler’s unique, AI-powered plant health data allows farmers and agribusinesses to address issues before they escalate, unlike drones or weather stations, which often provide information only after problems have already progressed and plants experience severe damage. Early disease and crop stress detection ensures that farmers can act timely to maximize yields and optimize fertilizers and pesticides application. Cropler isn’t just about monitoring—it’s about driving actionable insights that make farming more efficient, sustainable, and profitable. Milestones and achievements 🏆 357 devices deployed
🏆 Revenue of $53k in 2024
🏆 AI disease & leaf damages integration
🏆 iOS & Android app release
🏆 10 dealer centers in multiple countries
🏆 16 countries (EU + USA) have chosen our devices
🏆 USA & EU issued certificates for our devices
🏆 EIT Food Test Farm winner Finalist of 2024
🏆 China Overseas Talents Innovation and Entrepreneurship Competition
🏆 Partnerships with key market players (Varda Field ID, AGRIVI, SAS Agro, Kalo, Basf (Xarvio), Bayer, Syngenta etc.) Lessons learned 1️⃣ This was quite a challenge in building AI tools that could accurately adapt to the vast complexities of agronomic data. Initial models developed were rather far from the precision that agronomists required, struggling with symptom and stage variability across different crops. However, we further invested in our AI capabilities, enhancing our models by adding extensive data sets and collaborations with agricultural experts. This achieved two things: it not only enhanced the precision of our AI but also made our tools an inseparable companion for any agronomist by providing them with second-to-none insights and recommendations. 2️⃣ Another challenge was to convince the highly practical and quite skeptical agronomists to adopt this high-tech tool called Cropler. So, we shifted strategy and focused our efforts on education and hands-on involvement, showing agronomists not only how but why our technology worked. 3️⃣ One of the most significant challenges of launching the international expansion of our solution was overcoming the many regulatory, environmental, and operational hurdles spanning across continents, which drastically changed from region to region. We learned flexibility and local partnerships. By aligning ourselves with local agronomic experts and adapting our technology to meet regional regulations and needs, the stage was set for global impact-development of preparations for a major rollout in Europe by 2025. 4️⃣ Last, but not least, was a technical and logistical challenge to scale our technology from pilot projects to widespread usage by agronomists. So, we invested in scalable architecture and robust systems, supporting high demand for real-time data processing and global access. Our platform is not a tool; it's a 24/7 digital agronomist turning that data into actionable and timely advice. What Startups of The Year means to us Entering into HackerNoon's Startups of the Year is not an opportunity for Cropler but rather a stage to revolutionize the agribusiness panorama. We come to introduce our pioneering AI agri-camera technology that's going to change the world and make agriculture more predictable and effective. This is a moment in the spotlight to galvanize an industry for the attention of global investors, tech enthusiasts, and potential partners who are committed to transforming agriculture through innovation as much as we are. To be present there is already a loud statement of the capability and vision that we have. More than that, we are not just in attendance; we are leading from the front in this charge into the future where technology and sustainability come together to remake the standard of agriculture around the world. The insights and feedback that we get here from this eclectic tech community are very critical; it fuels our drive toward the 2025 launch of our Global Analytics. For us, this is more than a competition; this is a launching pad toward growth, visibility, and impact. Join us while we lead the way to a more efficient, sustainable, and predictable agricultural future! Vote for us today: https://hackernoon.com/startups/europe/europe-warsaw-poland Hey Hackers! Cropler has been nominated in HackerNoon's Startups of The Year 2024 awards in Warsaw, Poland under the Emerging Tech category and others. Cropler Cropler HackerNoon's Startups of The Year 2024 HackerNoon's Startups of The Year 2024 HackerNoon's Startups of The Year 2024 Emerging Tech category and others. Emerging Tech Emerging Tech Please vote for us here: Please vote for us here: 1️⃣ https://hackernoon.com/startups/europe/europe-warsaw-poland https://hackernoon.com/startups/europe/europe-warsaw-poland https://hackernoon.com/startups/europe/europe-warsaw-poland 2️⃣ https://hackernoon.com/startups/industry/iot https://hackernoon.com/startups/industry/iot https://hackernoon.com/startups/industry/iot 3️⃣ https://hackernoon.com/startups/industry/hardware https://hackernoon.com/startups/industry/hardware 4️⃣ https://hackernoon.com/startups/industry/climatetech https://hackernoon.com/startups/industry/climatetech Meet Cropler Cropler is the world’s first real-time remote photo plant monitoring technology that is about to become an AI-powered digital agronomical assistant. Cropler uses smart AI-powered mobile agricameras to help farmers and agribusinesses identify the key phenophases, diseases, and inputs efficiently to perform necessary agricultural operations in a timely manner. Cropler is the world’s first real-time remote photo plant monitoring technology that is about to become an AI-powered digital agronomical assistant. Cropler uses smart AI-powered mobile agricameras to help farmers and agribusinesses identify the key phenophases, diseases, and inputs efficiently to perform necessary agricultural operations in a timely manner. Cropler Cropler agricameras The Winning Team 1️⃣ Nik Bedunkevich LinkedIn Founder & CEO With over 10 years in software and 7+ years in hardware development, Nik's leadership in precision agriculture, backed by his experience at OneSoil, where he co-founded and led hardware development, has been instrumental. His background in Radio Engineering and his ability to integrate data exchange and soil analysis sensors have enabled Cropler to push the boundaries of AI-driven agricultural solutions. 2️⃣ Marie Sinkova LinkedIn CMO Marie’s 6+ years in marketing, including her impactful work at MEDvidi and EduDo, have significantly boosted our brand’s visibility. Her ability to develop engaging content and manage successful teams has increased revenue and brand recognition while minimizing negative reviews. Her strategic approach in various marketing areas has laid a solid foundation for Cropler development. 3️⃣ Andrii Zbrytskyi LinkedIn BDM With over 17 years in the agritech area, Andri Zbrytskyi has witnessed firsthand the ins and outs of clients resulting in better client/corporate relations, sales and even more business development for the company. AI agriculture solutions have found strategic partnerships thanks to his efforts and these have increased expanding the market base. 4️⃣ Xenia Niaborskaya LinkedIn Head of Design Xenia’s experience of more than 4 years in UX/UI design has played a key role in ensuring that our user interfaces work as expected and look good as well. Her capability in business-centered design and the process of user-centered design has improved the usability of our platform tremendously. 5️⃣ Eugene Voronets LinkedIn Tech Adviser Eugene’s 10+ years in backend development, particularly his expertise in high-load systems, ensures the robustness and scalability of our technology. His work at OneSoil, building APIs and fostering collaborations with industry leaders like John Deere and AWS, has played a critical role in shaping Cropler’s technical infrastructure. 1️⃣ Nik Bedunkevich Nik Bedunkevich LinkedIn LinkedIn LinkedIn LinkedIn Founder & CEO Founder & CEO With over 10 years in software and 7+ years in hardware development, Nik's leadership in precision agriculture, backed by his experience at OneSoil, where he co-founded and led hardware development, has been instrumental. His background in Radio Engineering and his ability to integrate data exchange and soil analysis sensors have enabled Cropler to push the boundaries of AI-driven agricultural solutions. 2️⃣ Marie Sinkova Marie Sinkova LinkedIn LinkedIn LinkedIn LinkedIn CMO CMO Marie’s 6+ years in marketing, including her impactful work at MEDvidi and EduDo, have significantly boosted our brand’s visibility. Her ability to develop engaging content and manage successful teams has increased revenue and brand recognition while minimizing negative reviews. Her strategic approach in various marketing areas has laid a solid foundation for Cropler development. 3️⃣ Andrii Zbrytskyi Andrii Zbrytskyi LinkedIn LinkedIn LinkedIn LinkedIn BDM BDM With over 17 years in the agritech area, Andri Zbrytskyi has witnessed firsthand the ins and outs of clients resulting in better client/corporate relations, sales and even more business development for the company. AI agriculture solutions have found strategic partnerships thanks to his efforts and these have increased expanding the market base. 4️⃣ Xenia Niaborskaya Xenia Niaborskaya LinkedIn LinkedIn LinkedIn LinkedIn Head of Design Head of Design Xenia’s experience of more than 4 years in UX/UI design has played a key role in ensuring that our user interfaces work as expected and look good as well. Her capability in business-centered design and the process of user-centered design has improved the usability of our platform tremendously. 5️⃣ Eugene Voronets Eugene Voronets LinkedIn LinkedIn LinkedIn LinkedIn Tech Adviser Tech Adviser Eugene’s 10+ years in backend development, particularly his expertise in high-load systems, ensures the robustness and scalability of our technology. His work at OneSoil, building APIs and fostering collaborations with industry leaders like John Deere and AWS, has played a critical role in shaping Cropler’s technical infrastructure. What Cropler does differently We aim to revolutionize agriculture with Cropler's global plant monitoring technology, which uses AI-powered agricameras and remote sensing data to provide farmers, agronomists, and agribusinesses with predictive field insights and global yield analytics for optimized crop production. global plant monitoring technology, Cropler’s unique, AI-powered plant health data allows farmers and agribusinesses to address issues before they escalate, unlike drones or weather stations, which often provide information only after problems have already progressed and plants experience severe damage. Early disease and crop stress detection ensures that farmers can act timely to maximize yields and optimize fertilizers and pesticides application. Cropler isn’t just about monitoring—it’s about driving actionable insights that make farming more efficient, sustainable, and profitable. Cropler isn’t just about monitoring—it’s about driving actionable insights that make farming more efficient, sustainable, and profitable. Milestones and achievements 🏆 357 devices deployed 🏆 Revenue of $53k in 2024 🏆 AI disease & leaf damages integration 🏆 iOS & Android app release 🏆 10 dealer centers in multiple countries 🏆 16 countries (EU + USA) have chosen our devices 🏆 USA & EU issued certificates for our devices 🏆 EIT Food Test Farm winner Finalist of 2024 🏆 China Overseas Talents Innovation and Entrepreneurship Competition 🏆 Partnerships with key market players (Varda Field ID, AGRIVI, SAS Agro, Kalo, Basf (Xarvio), Bayer, Syngenta etc.) 🏆 357 devices deployed 🏆 Revenue of $53k in 2024 🏆 AI disease & leaf damages integration 🏆 iOS & Android app release 🏆 10 dealer centers in multiple countries 🏆 16 countries (EU + USA) have chosen our devices 🏆 USA & EU issued certificates for our devices 🏆 EIT Food Test Farm winner Finalist of 2024 🏆 China Overseas Talents Innovation and Entrepreneurship Competition 🏆 Partnerships with key market players (Varda Field ID, AGRIVI, SAS Agro, Kalo, Basf (Xarvio), Bayer, Syngenta etc.) Lessons learned 1️⃣ This was quite a challenge in building AI tools that could accurately adapt to the vast complexities of agronomic data. Initial models developed were rather far from the precision that agronomists required, struggling with symptom and stage variability across different crops. However, we further invested in our AI capabilities, enhancing our models by adding extensive data sets and collaborations with agricultural experts. This achieved two things: it not only enhanced the precision of our AI but also made our tools an inseparable companion for any agronomist by providing them with second-to-none insights and recommendations. 2️⃣ Another challenge was to convince the highly practical and quite skeptical agronomists to adopt this high-tech tool called Cropler. So, we shifted strategy and focused our efforts on education and hands-on involvement, showing agronomists not only how but why our technology worked. agronomists 3️⃣ One of the most significant challenges of launching the international expansion of our solution was overcoming the many regulatory, environmental, and operational hurdles spanning across continents, which drastically changed from region to region. We learned flexibility and local partnerships. By aligning ourselves with local agronomic experts and adapting our technology to meet regional regulations and needs, the stage was set for global impact-development of preparations for a major rollout in Europe by 2025. global impact-development 4️⃣ Last, but not least, was a technical and logistical challenge to scale our technology from pilot projects to widespread usage by agronomists. So, we invested in scalable architecture and robust systems, supporting high demand for real-time data processing and global access. Our platform is not a tool; it's a 24/7 digital agronomist turning that data into actionable and timely advice. Our platform is not a tool; it's a 24/7 digital agronomist turning that data into actionable and timely advice. Our platform is not a tool; it's a 24/7 digital agronomist turning that data into actionable and timely advice. What Startups of The Year means to us Entering into HackerNoon's Startups of the Year is not an opportunity for Cropler but rather a stage to revolutionize the agribusiness panorama. We come to introduce our pioneering AI agri-camera technology that's going to change the world and make agriculture more predictable and effective. This is a moment in the spotlight to galvanize an industry for the attention of global investors, tech enthusiasts, and potential partners who are committed to transforming agriculture through innovation as much as we are. revolutionize the agribusiness To be present there is already a loud statement of the capability and vision that we have. To be present there is already a loud statement of the capability and vision that we have. More than that, we are not just in attendance; we are leading from the front in this charge into the future where technology and sustainability come together to remake the standard of agriculture around the world. The insights and feedback that we get here from this eclectic tech community are very critical; it fuels our drive toward the 2025 launch of our Global Analytics. For us, this is more than a competition; this is a launching pad toward growth, visibility, and impact. For us, this is more than a competition; this is a launching pad toward growth, visibility, and impact. Join us while we lead the way to a more efficient, sustainable, and predictable agricultural future! Vote for us today: https://hackernoon.com/startups/europe/europe-warsaw-poland Vote for us today: https://hackernoon.com/startups/europe/europe-warsaw-poland Vote for us today: https://hackernoon.com/startups/europe/europe-warsaw-poland

AI-Driven Solutions for Modern Agritech: Interview with SOTY 2024 Nominee, Cropler

The tech industry is no stranger to supply chain disruptions, but the recent U.S. port strike is creating new challenges that could have lasting effects. On the first day of October, thousands of dockworkers left key ports at a standstill along the East and Gulf Coasts. As a result, the flow of critical tech components and finished goods has slowed dramatically. This disruption comes at a critical time, especially when the tech industry is still recovering from supply chain issues caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Tech Industry’s Supply Chain Dependence on Ports The tech industry greatly relies on ports, especially those along the East and Gulf Coasts of the U.S. Ports serve as entry points for many components and raw materials needed to manufacture and assemble electronic devices. These parts often involve semiconductors, screens, batteries, and more. A single delayed shipment of any of these components can ripple through the supply chain, affecting production timelines, product availability, and pricing across the market. To put it into perspective, U.S. ports handle the majority of global trade. According to the National Association of Manufacturers, the affected ports manage 51% of the nation’s containerized imports. These containers often carry crucial tech parts from places like Asia and Europe, which then become distributed to manufacturing hubs within the U.S. As such, any disruption in the flow of these goods results in delayed product releases. The tech industry has long depended on a finely-tuned global supply chain that operates on just-in-time principles. This method is where components are precisely delivered when needed to minimize warehousing costs and maximize efficiency. However, this approach leaves little room for error. When a disruption like the U.S. port strike occurs, there isn’t a buffer to absorb the delay. As a result, you get stalled production lines, which delay product releases and cause a shortage of tech products. How Tech Companies Are Adapting Their Logistics Strategies The U.S. port strike has far-reaching consequences on the economy. As cargo remains stuck at the ports, companies face increasing shipping costs, production slowdowns, and an inability to meet consumer demand. To mitigate these economic effects, businesses are swiftly adapting their logistics strategies. Enhanced Visibility and Use of Technology in Logistics A lack of supply chain visibility is one major challenge within the U.S. port strike. According to recent findings, around 45% of stakeholders report having limited visibility beyond their first-tier suppliers. Unfortunately, this makes responding quickly to disruptions or anticipating potential issues difficult. To combat this, companies are adopting tech-driven logistics solutions that provide greater transparency in the supply chain. For instance, digital platforms now offer real-time tracking of every part of the supply chain process, providing stakeholders with better visibility of where goods are in transit. With machine learning improving route optimization, these technologies allow more efficient delivery routes and rapid responses to unforeseen events. Rerouting Shipments and Shifting Transportation Methods Many companies have resorted to rerouting cargo to ports on the West Coast or Canada to bypass the backlogs on the East and Gulf Coasts. However, these options come with unique challenges. West Coast ports are already operating at high capacity — with some facilities reaching 71% — leaving little room to accommodate the redirected shipments. Additionally, rerouting involves longer travel times and higher costs due to the need to manage new logistics routes. Air freight is becoming an increasingly attractive option for transporting time-sensitive tech products. However, these expensive methods often lead to higher costs for end products. Despite the increased expenses, air transport offers faster shipping times. Manufacturing facilities can ensure they receive their goods on time, but this method only works for smaller, high-value items that can absorb additional shipping costs. Shifting Toward Localization and Supply Chain Diversification Companies are also shifting toward localization as a strategic response to the strike. By sourcing materials closer to their consumer markets, they reduce the dependency on overseas shipments and minimize the risk associated with port congestion. The strategy of nearshoring — moving supply chains closer to home — offers faster transportation times and more stable supply chain operations. This method also makes it easier to respond to disruptions without heavily relying on international ports or long-haul transportation. Navigating the Shifts in the Supply Chain The U.S. port strike is a reminder of how quickly global supply chains can go into disarray and create lasting effects on the tech industry. Therefore, it is more important than ever for organizations to adapt their logistics. The strike presents immediate challenges, so companies must prepare for events like these and devise long-term strategies that help them increase their resiliency. The tech industry is no stranger to supply chain disruptions, but the recent U.S. port strike is creating new challenges that could have lasting effects. On the first day of October, thousands of dockworkers left key ports at a standstill along the East and Gulf Coasts. As a result, the flow of critical tech components and finished goods has slowed dramatically. This disruption comes at a critical time, especially when the tech industry is still recovering from supply chain issues caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Tech Industry’s Supply Chain Dependence on Ports The tech industry greatly relies on ports, especially those along the East and Gulf Coasts of the U.S. Ports serve as entry points for many components and raw materials needed to manufacture and assemble electronic devices. These parts often involve semiconductors, screens, batteries, and more. A single delayed shipment of any of these components can ripple through the supply chain, affecting production timelines, product availability, and pricing across the market. To put it into perspective, U.S. ports handle the majority of global trade. According to the National Association of Manufacturers, the affected ports manage 51% of the nation’s containerized imports. These containers often carry crucial tech parts from places like Asia and Europe, which then become distributed to manufacturing hubs within the U.S. As such, any disruption in the flow of these goods results in delayed product releases. the affected ports manage 51% the affected ports manage 51% The tech industry has long depended on a finely-tuned global supply chain that operates on just-in-time principles. This method is where components are precisely delivered when needed to minimize warehousing costs and maximize efficiency. However, this approach leaves little room for error. When a disruption like the U.S. port strike occurs, there isn’t a buffer to absorb the delay. As a result, you get stalled production lines, which delay product releases and cause a shortage of tech products. How Tech Companies Are Adapting Their Logistics Strategies The U.S. port strike has far-reaching consequences on the economy. As cargo remains stuck at the ports, companies face increasing shipping costs, production slowdowns, and an inability to meet consumer demand. To mitigate these economic effects, businesses are swiftly adapting their logistics strategies. Enhanced Visibility and Use of Technology in Logistics A lack of supply chain visibility is one major challenge within the U.S. port strike. According to recent findings, around 45% of stakeholders report having limited visibility beyond their first-tier suppliers. Unfortunately, this makes responding quickly to disruptions or anticipating potential issues difficult. To combat this, companies are adopting tech-driven logistics solutions that provide greater transparency in the supply chain. around 45% of stakeholders around 45% of stakeholders For instance, digital platforms now offer real-time tracking of every part of the supply chain process, providing stakeholders with better visibility of where goods are in transit. With machine learning improving route optimization, these technologies allow more efficient delivery routes and rapid responses to unforeseen events. now offer real-time tracking now offer real-time tracking Rerouting Shipments and Shifting Transportation Methods Many companies have resorted to rerouting cargo to ports on the West Coast or Canada to bypass the backlogs on the East and Gulf Coasts. However, these options come with unique challenges. West Coast ports are already operating at high capacity — with some facilities reaching 71% — leaving little room to accommodate the redirected shipments. Additionally, rerouting involves longer travel times and higher costs due to the need to manage new logistics routes. with some facilities reaching 71% with some facilities reaching 71% Air freight is becoming an increasingly attractive option for transporting time-sensitive tech products. However, these expensive methods often lead to higher costs for end products. Despite the increased expenses, air transport offers faster shipping times. Manufacturing facilities can ensure they receive their goods on time, but this method only works for smaller, high-value items that can absorb additional shipping costs. Shifting Toward Localization and Supply Chain Diversification Companies are also shifting toward localization as a strategic response to the strike. By sourcing materials closer to their consumer markets, they reduce the dependency on overseas shipments and minimize the risk associated with port congestion. The strategy of nearshoring — moving supply chains closer to home — offers faster transportation times and more stable supply chain operations. This method also makes it easier to respond to disruptions without heavily relying on international ports or long-haul transportation. Navigating the Shifts in the Supply Chain The U.S. port strike is a reminder of how quickly global supply chains can go into disarray and create lasting effects on the tech industry. Therefore, it is more important than ever for organizations to adapt their logistics. The strike presents immediate challenges, so companies must prepare for events like these and devise long-term strategies that help them increase their resiliency.

How Will the US Port Strike Affect the Global Tech Industry?

Bitcoinized Fossil Fuel

Биткоинизированное выкапнёвае паліва

Combustible fósil bitcoinizado

Combustible fossile bitcoinisé

דלק מאובן שעבר ביטקוין

ビットコイン化された化石燃料

Bahan Api Fosil Bitcoin

Ibicanwa bya Bitcoin

பிட்காயின் செய்யப்பட்ட புதைபடிவ எரிபொருள்

Сӯзишвории истихроҷи биткоинизатсияшуда

เชื้อเพลิงฟอสซิล Bitcoin

I-Bitcoinized Fossil Fuel

If you’ve spent any time on Facebook lately—and who hasn’t?—you’ve probably seen it. A group with a title that practically waves a red flag: “SCAMMERS LIST UPDATE.” It sounds like the place where you'd finally find the justice you’ve been looking for after falling victim to an online scam. Editor’s note: This story represents the views of the author of the story. The author is not affiliated with HackerNoon staff and wrote this story on their own. The HackerNoon editorial team has only verified the story for grammatical accuracy and does not condone/condemn any of the claims contained herein. #DYOR Maybe they’ll track down your lost money, or better yet, the scammer who conned you. Well, spoiler alert: they won’t. In fact, the ones behind this group are likely the same folks who ripped you off in the first place. Facebook, now going by Meta (because a rebrand magically fixes everything), is supposedly equipped with state-of-the-art systems to protect users from fraud. You’d think that includes shutting down a group that’s effectively a wolf in sheep’s clothing. But no, “SCAMMERS LIST UPDATE” is still up and running, despite countless reports by concerned users. And let’s be honest—Meta’s reaction has been about as useful as shouting into the wind. At first glance, this group seems almost noble. They’ve got the look of a do-gooder vigilante squad, dedicated to helping scam victims recover their hard-earned cash. But here’s where it gets twisted: the group is nothing more than a scam itself, a sinister plot to squeeze even more money out of already vulnerable victims. It’s like getting pickpocketed and then paying the thief to "help" you find your wallet. In what can only be described as a truly bitter irony, these fraudsters charge fees for “recovering” stolen funds. Spoiler number two: once you’ve sent money to a scammer, it’s gone. Vanished. The chances of some random Facebook group recovering it? About as likely as Facebook’s customer service actually responding to your complaints in a timely manner. But the real kicker? The group is riddled with scammers pretending to be everyday users. These aren’t your average internet trolls; these are organized scammers, often from overseas, posing as Westerners with stolen photos and fake profiles. And while the average user might not notice anything amiss, a closer look shows this group for what it is: a full-on scam factory. Profiles are fake, motives are even faker, and the whole thing is operating under the not-so-watchful eye of Meta. Despite numerous reports—complaints about everything from fake profiles to the scams happening right in plain sight—Meta has responded with a resounding, “We did not take any action.” Yeah, you read that right. One of the biggest tech companies in the world, with access to the kind of AI most of us can only dream of, is apparently powerless against a bunch of digital con artists. It’s almost laughable, except it’s not. Meta’s failure to act sends a chilling message: scammers are safe here. As long as they don’t get too loud about it, they can operate under the radar with little to no fear of getting booted off the platform. So what happens when someone, already humiliated and out a chunk of cash, turns to Meta for help? They’re met with silence—or worse, with a dismissive shrug. Why It's Time for Governments to Step In Meta's apparent refusal to address the rising tide of scams on its platform sends a troubling message: scammers have a safe haven under their watch. Rather than cracking down on fraud, Meta’s inaction seems to shield the very criminals preying on innocent users. Victims, already humiliated and financially drained, find no justice when they report fake profiles and fraudulent activity—just silence. The negligence isn't just a technological glitch; it’s a moral failure. It's time for governments to intervene, hold Meta accountable, and put an end to this unchecked lawlessness. Australia’s Albanese Government is stepping up to the plate with draft legislation aimed at slapping hefty penalties—up to $50 million—on banks, telecoms, and social media platforms like Facebook if they fail to fight back against fraud. Assistant Treasurer Stephen Jones is leading the charge, declaring that Australia will become one of the toughest places in the world for scammers to operate. He emphasized, "The best protections anywhere in the world should be available to people here in Australia." The truth is, Australians are losing too much money to scams. Although we've avoided the international trend where scam losses double yearly, we’re still seeing far too many victims. Jones' words signal a shift in accountability—finally putting pressure on social media giants like Facebook, which have let scams flourish for far too long. Former Sunrise host David Koch knows the frustration all too well. For years, he’s called out scammers using his image and fake quotes to deceive people, with Facebook doing little to stop it. “I had a bloke on the weekend contact me through Facebook, abusing me because he lost $30,000 to a scam that used my picture and dodgy comments,” says Koch. The reality is this: Facebook has devolved into a breeding ground for scams. The platform, once intended to connect us, has become a cesspool for fraudsters, from fake ads to phishing schemes, all targeting users daily. Even worse, Facebook’s ad system seems to amplify these scams, giving fraudsters an even bigger stage. Rather than protecting users, Meta seems more focused on cashing in ad revenue, no matter how deceptive the ads may be. Scammers are thriving on the very platform that claims to keep us safe. If governments don't intervene, Meta’s complicity will only continue to endanger users worldwide. It’s time for someone to wake up and realize this isn’t just a technical oversight—it’s a moral issue. Meta’s refusal to take down groups like “SCAMMERS LIST UPDATE” doesn’t just allow scammers to thrive, it almost feels like an endorsement. And as much as we’d love to think we’re safe online, the truth is that until companies like Meta are held accountable, scam culture will continue to thrive in plain sight. At this point, maybe it’s time to ask the government to step in. We’ve let these platforms self-regulate long enough, and it’s clear that isn’t working. Letting scammers run rampant under the guise of “user-generated content” is more than irresponsible—it’s complicit. Meta may think a new name wipes the slate clean, but if this group is any indication, the mess is far from over. If you’ve spent any time on Facebook lately—and who hasn’t?—you’ve probably seen it. A group with a title that practically waves a red flag: “SCAMMERS LIST UPDATE.” It sounds like the place where you'd finally find the justice you’ve been looking for after falling victim to an online scam. Editor’s note: This story represents the views of the author of the story. The author is not affiliated with HackerNoon staff and wrote this story on their own. The HackerNoon editorial team has only verified the story for grammatical accuracy and does not condone/condemn any of the claims contained herein. #DYOR Editor’s note: This story represents the views of the author of the story. The author is not affiliated with HackerNoon staff and wrote this story on their own. The HackerNoon editorial team has only verified the story for grammatical accuracy and does not condone/condemn any of the claims contained herein. #DYOR Editor’s note: This story represents the views of the author of the story. The author is not affiliated with HackerNoon staff and wrote this story on their own. The HackerNoon editorial team has only verified the story for grammatical accuracy and does not condone/condemn any of the claims contained herein. #DYOR Editor’s note: This story represents the views of the author of the story. The author is not affiliated with HackerNoon staff and wrote this story on their own. The HackerNoon editorial team has only verified the story for grammatical accuracy and does not condone/condemn any of the claims contained herein. #DYOR Maybe they’ll track down your lost money, or better yet, the scammer who conned you. Well, spoiler alert: they won’t. In fact, the ones behind this group are likely the same folks who ripped you off in the first place. Facebook, now going by Meta (because a rebrand magically fixes everything), is supposedly equipped with state-of-the-art systems to protect users from fraud . You’d think that includes shutting down a group that’s effectively a wolf in sheep’s clothing. fraud But no, “ SCAMMERS LIST UPDATE ” is still up and running, despite countless reports by concerned users. And let’s be honest—Meta’s reaction has been about as useful as shouting into the wind. SCAMMERS LIST UPDATE At first glance, this group seems almost noble. They’ve got the look of a do-gooder vigilante squad, dedicated to helping scam victims recover their hard-earned cash. But here’s where it gets twisted: the group is nothing more than a scam itself, a sinister plot to squeeze even more money out of already vulnerable victims. scam victims It’s like getting pickpocketed and then paying the thief to "help" you find your wallet. It’s like getting pickpocketed and then paying the thief to "help" you find your wallet. It’s like getting pickpocketed and then paying the thief to "help" you find your wallet. In what can only be described as a truly bitter irony, these fraudsters charge fees for “recovering” stolen funds. Spoiler number two: once you’ve sent money to a scammer, it’s gone. Vanished. The chances of some random Facebook group recovering it? About as likely as Facebook’s customer service actually responding to your complaints in a timely manner. Facebook But the real kicker? The group is riddled with scammers pretending to be everyday users. These aren’t your average internet trolls; these are organized scammers, often from overseas, posing as Westerners with stolen photos and fake profiles. And while the average user might not notice anything amiss, a closer look shows this group for what it is: a full-on scam factory. Profiles are fake, motives are even faker, and the whole thing is operating under the not-so-watchful eye of Meta. closer look this group Despite numerous reports—complaints about everything from fake profiles to the scams happening right in plain sight—Meta has responded with a resounding, “We did not take any action.” Yeah, you read that right. fake profiles One of the biggest tech companies in the world, with access to the kind of AI most of us can only dream of, is apparently powerless against a bunch of digital con artists. It’s almost laughable, except it’s not. Meta’s failure to act sends a chilling message: scammers are safe here. As long as they don’t get too loud about it, they can operate under the radar with little to no fear of getting booted off the platform. So what happens when someone, already humiliated and out a chunk of cash, turns to Meta for help? They’re met with silence—or worse, with a dismissive shrug. Why It's Time for Governments to Step In Meta's apparent refusal to address the rising tide of scams on its platform sends a troubling message: scammers have a safe haven under their watch. Rather than cracking down on fraud, Meta’s inaction seems to shield the very criminals preying on innocent users. Victims, already humiliated and financially drained, find no justice when they report fake profiles and fraudulent activity—just silence. The negligence isn't just a technological glitch; it’s a moral failure. It's time for governments to intervene, hold Meta accountable, and put an end to this unchecked lawlessness. Australia’s Albanese Government is stepping up to the plate with draft legislation aimed at slapping hefty penalties—up to $50 million—on banks, telecoms, and social media platforms like Facebook if they fail to fight back against fraud. Assistant Treasurer Stephen Jones is leading the charge, declaring that Australia will become one of the toughest places in the world for scammers to operate. He emphasized, "The best protections anywhere in the world should be available to people here in Australia." The truth is, Australians are losing too much money to scams. Although we've avoided the international trend where scam losses double yearly, we’re still seeing far too many victims. Jones' words signal a shift in accountability—finally putting pressure on social media giants like Facebook, which have let scams flourish for far too long. Former Sunrise host David Koch knows the frustration all too well. For years, he’s called out scammers using his image and fake quotes to deceive people, with Facebook doing little to stop it. “I had a bloke on the weekend contact me through Facebook, abusing me because he lost $30,000 to a scam that used my picture and dodgy comments,” says Koch. Sunrise host David Koch The reality is this: Facebook has devolved into a breeding ground for scams. The platform, once intended to connect us, has become a cesspool for fraudsters, from fake ads to phishing schemes, all targeting users daily. Even worse, Facebook’s ad system seems to amplify these scams, giving fraudsters an even bigger stage. Rather than protecting users, Meta seems more focused on cashing in ad revenue, no matter how deceptive the ads may be. Scammers are thriving on the very platform that claims to keep us safe. If governments don't intervene, Meta’s complicity will only continue to endanger users worldwide. It’s time for someone to wake up and realize this isn’t just a technical oversight—it’s a moral issue. Meta’s refusal to take down groups like “SCAMMERS LIST UPDATE” doesn’t just allow scammers to thrive, it almost feels like an endorsement. And as much as we’d love to think we’re safe online, the truth is that until companies like Meta are held accountable, scam culture will continue to thrive in plain sight. At this point, maybe it’s time to ask the government to step in. We’ve let these platforms self-regulate long enough, and it’s clear that isn’t working. Letting scammers run rampant under the guise of “user-generated content” is more than irresponsible—it’s complicit. Meta may think a new name wipes the slate clean, but if this group is any indication, the mess is far from over.

Stories, News & Mentions about OVRSEA

Ovrsea’s Stories on HackerNoon