Incorporating Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) while working with Large Language Models (LLMs) has evolved from an experimental approach to an industry standard. It is becoming a fundamental component in production AI systems due to its ability to reduce hallucinations and lower operational costs. Implementing Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is rarely a standalone effort. Additional strategies reliably accompany it, each essential for maximizing performance, accuracy, and reliability. These include high-quality data preparation and indexing, careful selection of semantic embedding models, optimization of retrieval engines, advanced prompt engineering, and robust system architecture with ongoing evaluation. Without these supporting components, a RAG pipeline would suffer from irrelevant retrievals, fragmented context, and diminished trustworthiness. Mastering chunking strategies is essential for making RAG truly effective, ensuring high relevance, preservation of context, and system efficiency. If you don’t understand chunking, you risk having a RAG pipeline that’s slow, expensive, and prone to context fragmentation or retrieval miss. What is Chunking? Imagine that you are a Data Scientist at an e-commerce company and have been tasked with building an AI customer support system to handle incoming support tickets. The system needs to understand customer queries and provide accurate responses by referencing the company's vast product documentation, policies, and historical support data. Let’s say you have already implemented a RAG-enabled customer support system that uses LLMs to handle customer queries. The system retrieves relevant documentation and uses an LLM to generate responses based on this context. While RAG and LLMs enhance accuracy, the system struggles with performance limitations that hinder its operational efficiency. When a customer asks: "How do I clean my Ultra Boost shoes that I bought last week?", the RAG system: Searches through product documentationRetrieves the entire Ultra Boost manual (50+ pages)Feeds this large context into the LLMGenerates a response Searches through product documentation Retrieves the entire Ultra Boost manual (50+ pages) Feeds this large context into the LLM Generates a response But as it does this, it faces the below challenges : High token consumption: Processing entire documentsSlower response times: 2-3 seconds per queryIncreased API costs: Large context windowsDiluted relevance: Important information mixed with noise High token consumption: Processing entire documents Slower response times: 2-3 seconds per query Increased API costs: Large context windows Diluted relevance: Important information mixed with noise This is where chunking becomes crucial. Instead of feeding entire documents into the system, you need a way to break down this information into smaller, meaningful pieces that can be efficiently retrieved and processed. Proper chunking directly impacts retrieval precision and recall: chunks that are too large may dilute relevance, while chunks that are too small may fragment context, making it harder for the model to accurately answer complex queries. The choice of chunking methodology determines how well the RAG pipeline balances context preservation, retrieval accuracy, and computational efficiency. Before Chunking: Before Chunking: Query: "How do I clean Ultra Boost?"Retrieved: Entire 50-page manualResponse Time: 2.3 seconds Query: "How do I clean Ultra Boost?" Retrieved: Entire 50-page manual Response Time: 2.3 seconds After Chunking: After Chunking: Query: "How do I clean Ultra Boost?"Retrieved: Specific cleaning instructions chunk (100 words)Response Time: 0.3 seconds Query: "How do I clean Ultra Boost?" Retrieved: Specific cleaning instructions chunk (100 words) Response Time: 0.3 seconds What is the Role of Chunking in RAG? In RAG, the retrieval step depends on matching the user's query with pre-processed knowledge stored in a vector database. Chunking is the process of splitting raw documents into smaller, retrievable units (chunks) before embedding them. Think of it as breaking down a massive textbook into logical chapters and sections, making it easier to find specific information. Let's understand this with our e-commerce support system: Let's understand this with our e-commerce support system: The chunking process converts a monolithic 50-page product manual into strategically sized segments, each optimized for vector embedding and retrieval. These meaningful chunks, ranging from 80-150 words, are organized by distinct topics like product specifications, sizing, care instructions, and warranty terms, enabling the RAG system to efficiently match queries with relevant context while maintaining semantic coherence. The following is an example flow: Meaningful Chunks can be chunked as follows: Product Overview (100 words)Technical Specifications (150 words)Sizing Guide (120 words)Care Instructions (100 words)Warranty Terms (80 words) Product Overview (100 words) Technical Specifications (150 words) Sizing Guide (120 words) Care Instructions (100 words) Warranty Terms (80 words) Each chunk is then processed: Converted into vector embeddingStored in a vector databaseIndexed for quick retrieval Converted into vector embedding Stored in a vector database Indexed for quick retrieval When a customer asks: "What's the warranty coverage?", the system: Analyzes the querySearches the vector databaseRetrieves relevant warranty chunkUses this focused context for LLM response Analyzes the query Searches the vector database Retrieves relevant warranty chunk Uses this focused context for LLM response This approach is fundamentally different from processing entire documents because: Only relevant portions are retrievedVector matching is more preciseSystem resources are used efficientlyResponses are faster and more accurate Only relevant portions are retrieved Vector matching is more precise System resources are used efficiently Responses are faster and more accurate Think of it like having a well-organized filing system instead of searching through entire file cabinets for a single piece of information. Chunking serves several critical purposes: Chunking serves several critical purposes: Improves Retrieval Accuracy Smaller, focused chunks reduce the risk of retrieving irrelevant material from long documents. Each chunk is embedded independently, making it easier for the vector store to match specific parts of a document to a user’s query. Example Query: "What's the warranty for sole damage?" Without Chunking:Retrieved: Entire 50-page manualResult: Warranty information buried in irrelevant content Without Chunking: Retrieved: Entire 50-page manual Result: Warranty information buried in irrelevant content With Chunking:Retrieved: Specific warranty chunk"Ultra Boost soles are warranted against defects for 2 years. Wear and tear from regular use not covered..."Result: Precise, relevant information With Chunking: Retrieved: Specific warranty chunk "Ultra Boost soles are warranted against defects for 2 years. Wear and tear from regular use not covered..." Result: Precise, relevant information Preserves Context for Generation Properly chunked text keeps related sentences together, so when retrieved, the LLM gets enough information to answer without missing key details. Prevents “context scattering,” where important related content is split across unrelated chunks. Example Query: "How should I clean white Ultra Boosts?" Poor Chunking (Context Lost):Chunk 1: "Clean with mild soap..."Chunk 2: "...but white shoes require special care" Poor Chunking (Context Lost): Chunk 1: "Clean with mild soap..." Chunk 2: "...but white shoes require special care" Proper Chunking (Context Preserved):Single Chunk: "Clean white Ultra Boosts with mild soap. White shoes require special care to prevent yellowing. Use specialized shoe cleaner for tough stains." Proper Chunking (Context Preserved): Single Chunk: "Clean white Ultra Boosts with mild soap. White shoes require special care to prevent yellowing. Use specialized shoe cleaner for tough stains." Enables Efficient Indexing & Search Instead of embedding entire long documents, chunking allows storage and retrieval of only the relevant segments which in turn reduces computation during query-time retrieval. Example Memory Usage Comparison: Original Document: 500MB product catalogChunked Version: Only relevant 100KB chunks loadedQuery Processing Time:Without Chunking: 2.3 seconds (processing entire documents)With Chunking: 0.3 seconds (processing relevant chunks) Original Document: 500MB product catalog Chunked Version: Only relevant 100KB chunks loaded Query Processing Time: Without Chunking: 2.3 seconds (processing entire documents) With Chunking: 0.3 seconds (processing relevant chunks) Balances Recall and PrecisionRecall can defined as the likelihood of finding all relevant chunks for a query while Precision is the likelihood that retrieved chunks are only relevant. The chunking method affects this balance, as it can be too small, requiring many chunks to cover the topic (lower precision), or too large, resulting in missing fine-grained matches (lower recall). Balances Recall and Precision Recall can defined as the likelihood of finding all relevant chunks for a query while Precision is the likelihood that retrieved chunks are only relevant. The chunking method affects this balance, as it can be too small, requiring many chunks to cover the topic (lower precision), or too large, resulting in missing fine-grained matches (lower recall). Recall Precision Example Query: "What's the Ultra Boost sizing for wide feet" Too Small Chunks: Chunk 1: "Ultra Boost sizes run small"Chunk 2: "Wide feet may need..."Chunk 3: "...additional space"Result: Fragmented information, multiple retrievals needed Chunk 1: "Ultra Boost sizes run small" Chunk 2: "Wide feet may need..." Chunk 3: "...additional space" Result: Fragmented information, multiple retrievals needed Too Large Chunks: "Complete sizing guide including all shoe models, materials, care instructions..." (information overload)Optimal Chunk:"Ultra Boost sizing for wide feet: Order 0.5 size up. Wide-foot customers should consider full size up for comfort. Models with Primeknit upper offer more flexibility." "Complete sizing guide including all shoe models, materials, care instructions..." (information overload) Optimal Chunk: "Ultra Boost sizing for wide feet: Order 0.5 size up. Wide-foot customers should consider full size up for comfort. Models with Primeknit upper offer more flexibility." Conclusion Chunking may seem like a simple preprocessing step, but it is truly the backbone of a successful RAG pipeline. By structuring information into meaningful, retrievable units, it unlocks faster responses, reduces costs, and delivers more precise, context-rich answers. Whether you’re building customer support systems, knowledge assistants, or enterprise AI platforms, mastering chunking strategies is the difference between a RAG system that feels clunky and one that feels intelligent and reliable.

This story contains AI-generated text. The author has used AI either for research, to generate outlines, or write the text itself. 

Walkthroughs, tutorials, guides, and tips. This story will teach you how to do something new or how to do something better.

Chunking in RAG: The Key to Efficient, Accurate Retrieval

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

How to Scale LLM Apps Without Exploding Your Cloud Bill

100 Days of AI Day 6: Retrieval Techniques and Their Use Cases

The Noonification: How Do You Create Value for a Product? (12/27/2023)

A Tutorial On How to Build Your Own RAG and How to Run It Locally: Langchain + Ollama + Streamlit

AI for Knowledge Management: Iterating on RAG with the QE-RAG Architecture

How to Effectively Evaluate Your RAG + LLM Applications

How to Scale LLM Apps Without Exploding Your Cloud Bill

100 Days of AI Day 6: Retrieval Techniques and Their Use Cases

The Noonification: How Do You Create Value for a Product? (12/27/2023)

A Tutorial On How to Build Your Own RAG and How to Run It Locally: Langchain + Ollama + Streamlit

AI for Knowledge Management: Iterating on RAG with the QE-RAG Architecture

How to Effectively Evaluate Your RAG + LLM Applications

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Minty

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps