paint-brush
CGAAL: A Distributed On-The-Fly ATL Model Checker: The Definitions You Should Know Aboutby@heuristicsearch
789 reads
789 reads

CGAAL: A Distributed On-The-Fly ATL Model Checker: The Definitions You Should Know About

tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

This paper is available on arxiv under CC 4.0 license. We recall the definitions of concurrent games and alternating-time temporal logic. A computation starting in the state *q* is called a *q-computation. We will refer to them as "enforce" and "despite", respectively.
featured image - CGAAL: A Distributed On-The-Fly ATL Model Checker: The Definitions You Should Know About
Aiding in the focused exploration of potential solutions. HackerNoon profile picture

This paper is available on arxiv under CC 4.0 license.

Authors:

(1) Falke B. Ø. Carlsen, Department of Computer Science, Aalborg University, Denmark & [email protected];

(2) Lars Bo P. Frydenskov, Department of Computer Science, Aalborg University, Denmark & [email protected];

(3) Nicolaj Ø. Jensen, Department of Computer Science, Aalborg University, Denmark & [email protected];

(4) Jener Rasmussen, [email protected];

(5) Mathias M. Sørensen, [email protected];

(6) Asger G. Weirsøe, [email protected];

(7) Mathias C. Jensen, Department of Computer Science, Aalborg University, Denmark & [email protected];

(8) Kim G. Larsen, Department of Computer Science, Aalborg University, Denmark & [email protected].

Introduction

Definitions

Model Checking

Tool Overview

Evaluation

Conclusion and References

2 Definitions

We recall the definitions of concurrent games and alternating-time temporal logic.



A computation starting in the state q is called a q-computation.



Alternating-time Temporal Logic The alternating-time temporal logic (ATL) [1] is defined with respect to a finite set Π of propositions and a finite set Σ = {1,...,k} of players. An ATL formula is given by the abstract syntax:



where p ∈ Π is a proposition and A ⊆ Σ is a set of players. The operators ⟪⋅⟫ and J⋅K are path quantifiers. We will refer to them as "enforce" and "despite", respectively. The ◯ ("next") and U ("until") are temporal operators. Additional temporal operators like ♢ ("eventually") and □ ("invariant") are derived as usual.


Given a state q of a game structure S, we write q ⊧ φ to indicate that the state q satisfies the property described by φ. The satisfactory relation ⊧ is defined inductively:



This paper is available on Arxiv under CC 4.0 license.