Advances in Photocatalytic Materials through SALSA

Table of Links

Abstract and Introduction

SALSA- (S)ubstitution, (A)pproximation, Evo(L)utionary (S)earch, and (A)B-Initio Calculations

SALSA Applied to Photocatalytic Water-splitting

Discussion

Methods

Conclusions, Data Availability Statement and References

Appendix: Supplementary Material

VI. CONCLUSIONS

We have introduced a general materials design process that can be used for many applications. The process only requires a dataset of known compounds with known properties and the ability to calculate some of the properties from first-principles for a small set of structures. We applied our new process to an unrealized artificial photosynthesis technology and were able to discover materials that are good candidates for photocatalytic water-splitting. This includes PbCuSeCl, a material with a novel structure, which we were able to discover because our process allows for an expansive search of structure space. It also includes Ti2O4Pb3Se3 which has band gap and interpolated redox potentials within the ideal range for photocatalytic water-splitting.

Furthermore, work is underway to improve several methods used in the SALSA process. We may expand and enhance further the substitution matrix. We are also working on a way to generalize the redox potential calculation method with larger datasets.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

SMS is supported by the Mendoza Lab start-up funds. JLMC acknowledges start-up funds from Michigan State University. This work was supported in part by computational resources and services provided by the Institute for CyberEnabled Research at Michigan State University.

Author Contributions. AA and JLMC started the project in 2012-2013. JLMC conceived the idea and executed the first iterations of the search algorithms. AA and JLMC wrote the first draft. AA and JLMC implemented and developed the first iteration of the algorithms. SMS, MD, YL continued and finished the project. SMS implemented the next generation of the algorithm. Conceptualization: AA, JLMC. Methodology: AA, SMS, MD, YL, JLMC. Software: AA, SMS, MD, YL, JLMC. Validation: AA, SMS, MD, YL, JLMC. Formal Analysis: SMS, MD, JLMC. Investigation: AA, SMS, MD, JLMC. Resources: JLMC. Writing—original draft preparation: AA, JLMC. Writing—review and editing: SMS, AA, MD, YL, JLMC. Visualization: SMS, MD, JLMC. Supervision: JLMC. Project administration: JLMC. Funding Acquisition: JLMC. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

1V. Smil, Energy Transitions: Global and National Perspectives, 2nd ed. (Praeger, Westport, Connecticut, USA, 2017).

2M. R. Hannah Ritchie and P. Rosado, “Energy,” Our World in Data (2022), https://ourworldindata.org/energy.

3 “bp statistical review of world energy 2022,” Technical Report. Statistical Review of World Energy.

4D. Williams, “Sun fact sheet,” NASA Fact Sheets (2022).

5H. Ritchie and M. Roser, “Why did renewables become so cheap so fast?” (Retrieved 2021).

6 J. D. Farmer and F. Lafond, “How predictable is technological progress?” Research Policy 45, 647–665 (2016).

7 “Renewable energy capacity statistics 2020,” Technical Report. Renewable Energy Capacity Statistics.

8A. de La Tour, M. Glachant, and Y. Meni ´ ere, “Predicting the costs of photo- ` voltaic solar modules in 2020 using experience curve models,” Energy 62, 341–348 (2013).

9M. B. Hayat, D. Ali, K. C. Monyake, L. Alagha, and N. Ahmed, “Solar energy-a look into power generation, challenges, and a solar-powered future,” International Journal of Energy Research 43, 1049–1067 (2018).

10W. S. Ebhota and T.-C. Jen, “Fossil fuels environmental challenges and the role of solar photovoltaic technology advances in fast tracking hybrid renewable energy system,” International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology 7, 97–117 (2019).

11P. Choudhary and R. K. Srivastava, “Sustainability perspectives- a review for solar photovoltaic trends and growth opportunities,” Journal of Cleaner Production 227, 589–612 (2019).

12N. S. M. N. Izam, Z. Itam, W. L. Sing, and A. Syamsir, “Sustainable development perspectives of solar energy technologies with focus on solar photovoltaic—a review,” Energies 15, 2790 (2022).

13B. Van Zeghbroeck, Principles of Semiconductor Devices (University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA, 2004).

14X. Ma and H. Tian, “Photochemistry and photophysics. concepts, research, applications. by vincenzo balzani, paola ceroni and alberto juris.” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 53, 8817–8817 (2014).

15A. Fujishima and K. Honda, “Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode,” Nature 238, 37–38 (1972).

16J. George and G. Hautier, “Chemist versus machine: Traditional knowledge versus machine learning techniques,” Trends in Chemistry 3, 86–95 (2021).

17A. R. Oganov, C. J. Pickard, Q. Zhu, and R. J. Needs, “Structure prediction drives materials discovery,” Nat. Rev. Mater. 4, 331–348 (2019).

18Y. Liu, T. Zhao, W. Ju, and S. Shi, “Materials discovery and design using machine learning,” Journal of Materiomics 3, 159–177 (2017).

19G. Hautier, C. Fischer, V. Ehrlacher, A. Jain, and G. Ceder, “Data mined ionic substitutions for the discovery of new compounds,” Inorganic Chemistry 50, 656–663 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1021/ic102031h.

20A. R. Oganov and C. W. Glass, “Crystal structure prediction using ab initio evolutionary techniques: Principles and applications,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 124, 244704 (2006), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2210932.

21A. R. Oganov, A. O. Lyakhov, and M. Valle, “How evolutionary crystal structure prediction works—-and why,” Accounts of Chemical Research 44, 227–237 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1021/ar1001318.

22A. O. Lyakhov, A. R. Oganov, H. T. Stokes, and Q. Zhu, “New developments in evolutionary structure prediction algorithm uspex,” Computer Physics Communications 184, 1172 – 1182 (2013).

23G. Bergerhoff, I. D. Brown, et al., “Crystallographic databases, ed,” FH Allen, International Union of Crystallography, Chester (1987).

24R. Dovesi, A. Erba, R. Orlando, C. M. Zicovich-Wilson, B. Civalleri, L. Maschio, M. Rerat, S. Casassa, J. Baima, S. Salus- ´ tro, and B. Kirtman, “Quantum-mechanical condensed matter simulations with crystal,” WIREs Computational Molecular Science 8 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1360, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/wcms.1360.

25R. Dovesi, V. R. Saunders, C. Roetti, R. Orlando, C. M. Zicovich-Wilson, F. Pascale, B. Civalleri, K. Doll, N. M. Harrison, I. J. Bush, P. D’Arco, M. Llunell, M. Causa, Y. No ` el, L. Maschio, A. Erba, M. Rerat, and ¨ S. Casassa, CRYSTAL17 User’s Manual, University of Torino, Torino (2018).

26S. Curtarolo, W. Setyawan, G. L. Hart, M. Jahnatek, R. V. Chepulskii, R. H. Taylor, S. Wang, J. Xue, K. Yang, O. Levy, M. J. Mehl, H. T. Stokes, D. O. Demchenko, and D. Morgan, “AFLOW: An automatic framework for highthroughput materials discovery,” Computational Materials Science 58, 218– 226 (2012).

27“Preismonitor 2019,” Technical Report. (2019).

28“Titanium sponge,” Technical Report. (2020).

29“Liquid chlorine demands goes up with substantial price hike,” News Report. (2013).

30“China china petroleum & chemical industry association: Petrochemical price: Inorganic chemical material,” Technical Report. (2020).

31J. Ronald G. Ross, Cryocoolers 11 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Massachusetts, USA, 2001).

32G. Kresse and J. Hafner, “Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals,” Phys. Rev. B 47, 558–561 (1993).

33G. Kresse and J. Furthmuller, “Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calcula- ¨ tions for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set,” Computational Materials Science 6, 15 – 50 (1996).

34G. Kresse and J. Furthmuller, “Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total- ¨ energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set,” Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169– 11186 (1996).

35J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, “Generalized gradient approximation made simple,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).

36G. Kresse and D. Joubert, “From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method,” Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).

37P. E. Blochl, “Projector augmented-wave method,” ¨ Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953– 17979 (1994).

38S. Grimme, J. Antony, S. Ehrlich, and H. Krieg, “A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (dft-d) for the 94 elements h-pu,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 132, 154104 (2010).

39S. Grimme, S. Ehrlich, and L. Goerigk, “Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory,” Journal of Computational Chemistry 32, 1456–1465 (2011), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jcc.21759.

40J. Heyd, G. E. Scuseria, and M. Ernzerhof, “Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb potential,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 118, 8207–8215 (2003), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/articlepdf/118/18/8207/10847843/8207 1 online.pdf.

41A. V. Krukau, O. A. Vydrov, A. F. Izmaylov, and G. E. Scuseria, “Influence of the exchange screening parameter on the performance of screened hybrid functionals,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 125 (2006), 10.1063/1.2404663, 224106, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/articlepdf/doi/10.1063/1.2404663/13263224/224106 1 online.pdf.

42W. J. Stevens, H. Basch, and M. Krauss, “Compact effective potentials and efficient shared-exponent basis sets for the first-and second-row atoms,” The Journal of chemical physics 81, 6026–6033 (1984).

43W. J. Stevens, M. Krauss, H. Basch, and P. G. Jasien, “Relativistic compact effective potentials and efficient, shared-exponent basis sets for the third-, fourth-, and fifth-row atoms,” Canadian Journal of Chemistry 70, 612–630 (1992).