A Tale of Two Cities: Economic vs Digital Democracyby@sharepass
381 reads
381 reads

A Tale of Two Cities: Economic vs Digital Democracy

by SharePassOctober 20th, 2022
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story w/o Javascript
tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

Two decades ago, few people could seriously think about the existence of a meta universe that would combine exchanges, workspaces, and places for entertainment. But today, such prospects are serious enough. What should we expect next? The rise of the Web 3.0 standard, its development and perspectives How will this standard impact our everyday lives and what opportunities will it open for us?

Company Mentioned

Mention Thumbnail
featured image - A Tale of Two Cities: Economic vs Digital Democracy
SharePass HackerNoon profile picture

In a world fueled by material wealth and capital production, there’s no trouble finding any number of government agencies and research centers charged with preparing detailed and comprehensive statistics tracking everything from the wealthiest pets in the world to the average age of farm owners. And for a good reason. To prevent economic bottlenecks from developing around entrenched interest groups or legacy stakeholders, we require constant insight into and oversight over who owns what and how they manage it. The idea that a government by the people must promote an economy for the people is central to virtually all modern nations.

But when considering the state of the digital economy, we find a very different story. In a scene reminiscent of the Wild West, most data are farmed, owned, and handled by a relatively small number of corporate giants. How few? With barely any attention paid to the data lifecycle, it’s impossible to tell. Wave after wave of data leaks and privacy scandals consume headlines, but it is still incredibly difficult to find credible statistics on data ownership and trade. All this at a time when data, more than oil or factories, is poised to become the most valuable asset of the Information Age.

It gets worse. With most data being owned by private companies, a profits-first approach has gradually been baked into each step of the collection, storage, transfer, and retirement process. Over 90% of companies fail to meet basic cybersecurity practices and will continue to do so if short-term cost savings remains the name of the game. Historically, corporate abuses of user data have resulted in relatively paltry fines, if any. And while the public outcry certainly grows louder, the breaches grow larger still.

To choose one example among many, an Australian telecoms firm recently leaked personal details tied to many of its customers (10 million) because of a breach. The data leaked includes identity-related information such as passport details, driving license details and Medicare numbers for millions of Australians. The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) questions whether the company even reasonably attempted to protect their user data. What is the maximum penalty being proposed? Just over $2 million. What is the cost for the end user? We will never know.

While tighter regulations and increased oversight are certainly beneficial, the truth is that we’ve been trying to bail out a sinking ship with a thimble. More than laws and fines, we need to reconsider data ownership and control as an ecosystem and discover new structures that take information ownership out of the hands of influential 3rd party entities and give it back to end users, the people. We need a new method that is built on a unique kind of digital infrastructure that promotes user rights over corporate desires.

A Few Proposed Principles

  1. At no point during the data lifecycle should my PII (personally identifiable information) be accessible without my permission.
  2. At no point during the data lifecycle should my personal information be stored in an unsafe place or transferred unsafely.
  3. At no point during the data lifecycle should my personal information be outside my control.

In summary, during the entirety of my data lifecycle, I should have the sole ability to provide access to, delete, and otherwise manage my data permissions.


At SharePass, data privacy and security are at the heart of everything we do. SharePass enables personal users and businesses to store, communicate, and manage all their sensitive data in one place.

This is done by functioning as a safe box for any sensitive data you’d like to send to a company or individual. Rather than sending or submitting the data directly (which would grant full control and access to the recipient), SharePass users provide a secure link that, when clicked, provides the recipient with temporary access. This access is qualified by security and privacy settings, fully customized for each user, and can be revoked anytime.

With SharePass, users retain complete ownership and control over their data even as they use it in their personal and professional lives.

Don’t risk it. SharePass it!

Originally published here.