paint-brush
A Categorical Account of Composition Methods in Logic: Prelimenariesby@escholar

A Categorical Account of Composition Methods in Logic: Prelimenaries

by EScholar: Electronic Academic Papers for Scholars
EScholar: Electronic Academic Papers for Scholars HackerNoon profile picture

EScholar: Electronic Academic Papers for Scholars

@escholar

We publish the best academic work (that's too often lost...

March 21st, 2024
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story in a terminal
Print this story
Read this story w/o Javascript
Read this story w/o Javascript
tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

In this paper, we present a categorical theory of the composition methods in finite model theory – a key technique enabling modular reasoning.
featured image - A Categorical Account of
Composition Methods in Logic: Prelimenaries
1x
Read by Dr. One voice-avatar

Listen to this story

EScholar: Electronic Academic Papers for Scholars HackerNoon profile picture
EScholar: Electronic Academic Papers for Scholars

EScholar: Electronic Academic Papers for Scholars

@escholar

We publish the best academic work (that's too often lost to peer reviews & the TA's desk) to the global tech community

About @escholar
LEARN MORE ABOUT @ESCHOLAR'S
EXPERTISE AND PLACE ON THE INTERNET.

This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY-SA 4.0 DEED license.

Authors:

(1) Tomáš Jakl, Czech Academy of Sciences and Czech Technical University;

(2) Dan Marsden, School of Computer Science University of Nottingham;

(3) Nihil Shah, Department of Computer Science University of Oxford.

II. PRELIMINARIES

A. Categories of Relational Structures

We assume the basic definitions of category theory, including categories, functors and natural transformations, as can be found in any standard introduction such as [29] or [30]. Background on comonads, and any less standard material is introduced as needed.


troduced as needed. A relational signature σ is a set of relation symbols, each with an associated strictly positive natural number arity. A σstructure A consists of a universe set, also denoted A, and for each relation symbol R ∈ σ of arity n, an n-ary relation RA on A. A morphism of σ-structures f : A → B is a function of type A → B, preserving relations, in the sense that for n-ary R ∈ σ


image


For a fixed σ, σ-structures and their morphisms form our main category of interest R(σ). We will also have need of the category of pointed relational structures R∗(σ). Here the objects (A, a) are a σ-structure A with a distinguished element a ∈ A. The morphisms are σ-structure morphisms that also preserve the distinguished element.


B. Comonads

image

image


The intuition for each of these comonads is that they encode the moves within one structure during the corresponding model comparison game. We shall introduce their mathematical properties as needed in later sections. See [11] for detailed discussions of all three comonads.

L O A D I N G
. . . comments & more!

About Author

EScholar: Electronic Academic Papers for Scholars HackerNoon profile picture
EScholar: Electronic Academic Papers for Scholars@escholar
We publish the best academic work (that's too often lost to peer reviews & the TA's desk) to the global tech community

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN...

Arweave
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story in a terminal
 Terminal
Read this story w/o Javascript
Read this story w/o Javascript
 Lite
X REMOVE AD