paint-brush
I still hate 280 chars. Here’s whyby@vernekard
107 reads

I still hate 280 chars. Here’s why

by Dinesh Vernekar
Dinesh Vernekar HackerNoon profile picture

Dinesh Vernekar

@vernekard

Co-founder

December 14th, 2017
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story in a terminal
Print this story
Read this story w/o Javascript
Read this story w/o Javascript
tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

When Twitter announced their plan to double the char limit for tweets, it seemed like the dumbest idea ever. <em>Why would anyone want to kill the very thing that made a platform unique?</em>

Companies Mentioned

Mention Thumbnail
BUNCH
Mention Thumbnail
Twitter
featured image - I still hate 280 chars. Here’s why
Dinesh Vernekar HackerNoon profile picture
Dinesh Vernekar

Dinesh Vernekar

@vernekard

Co-founder

image

280 chars — Image courtesy: http://wersm.com/twitter-expands-character-limit-to-280-in-global-test/

When Twitter announced their plan to double the char limit for tweets, it seemed like the dumbest idea ever. Why would anyone want to kill the very thing that made a platform unique?

Twitter’s reasoning was that even with a double the number of chars — a lot of users were going to continue tweeting the way they used to. Creatively & with 140 chars.

It’s been true to a certain extent. After the initial euphoria where i tweeted this, i’ve mostly used 140 chars to tweet stuff. But that’s just me.

image

Only use i could find for 280 chars!

The most common arguments against the 280 char limit were:

  1. It would kill the creativity of twitter
  2. It makes tweets difficult to scan/read inside the feed.
  3. If you want to write a blog there’s medium. If you want to have a deep debate — write an essay & share a link.

Twitter got a whole bunch of snark for this.

image

Ouch!

The argument in favor of 280 chars:

  1. More chars means your thoughts have more depth & breadth

Let’s examine what’s happened a month later..

A lot of users have taken to the 280 char limit & twitter has changed. The biggest adopters are brands and news publications. It’s definitely become much more difficult to scan your feed.

image

Whoa, am I reading a novel?

However it’s not as bad since images are given a lot of importance in the feed and break it frequently.

image

Images break the feed so it’s not that bad.

The beauty of the old format was that most of the time you’ll tweet short, concise thoughts which were easy to read. The few times you wanted to tweet something bigger, you’ll could post a picture. Also it meant brands didn’t post entire press releases as a blob of text!

image

Threads used to be so much fun

image

Easy to read!

TD:LR —

A month later i still hate the change. What do you think?

If you found the article useful, please feel free to hit the green ‘RECOMMEND’ button. And add a comment :)

You can follow me on Twitter or Linkedin

L O A D I N G
. . . comments & more!

About Author

Dinesh Vernekar HackerNoon profile picture
Dinesh Vernekar@vernekard
Co-founder

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN...

Permanent on Arweave
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story in a terminal
 Terminal
Read this story w/o Javascript
Read this story w/o Javascript
 Lite

Mentioned in this story

companies
X REMOVE AD