263 Meetings, 12 Months and $128,700 in Startup Funding Later

How can I raise my first round of capital? Do I need a product? What metrics do I need to show? Or can I raise money based only on a deck and story? These were some of the questions that I kept asking myself and friends for months after starting to work on Alpe. The more I asked around, the more I realized it wasn’t only me asking those questions. is the most misunderstood and untold stage of startup life. I’m not talking about series A or B, or even seed. I’m talking about raising pre-seed money. Early stage fundraising That’s the stage we’re all asking the same questions: How did you raise your first round of capital? Who gave you that angel money to build the MVP you needed to show traction? How did you convince someone to bet on you when you had nothing to show? Did you quit your job and work full time? Maybe you’ve read that “the market is swimming in cash” or “It’s never been easier to raise capital”, but this is definitely not the case, or at least is first level thinking¹. The reality is that unless you’re in a specific inner circle of founders² it’s incredibly difficult to raise those first rounds of capital. I know because I and many founders I interact with have been there. My goal with this post isn’t to tell you , rather it’s to share the actual story of how we raised $128,000 over our first 12 months. I don’t think there’s a way to fundraise³ -each company and founder is different — so I’ll share our story, our numbers, our lists, and metrics — basically, all the in-depth details I wished I’d had available when we started our journey at Alpe Audio⁴. how to do it Nine months to MVP I started working on Alpe because of a traffic jam. I needed to study a topic in-depth and there was no way to do it while driving. Podcasts weren’t good enough and Coursera was a bad mobile experience. That first pain point led me down a rabbit hole of prototypes and user interviews that eventually led to Alpe Audio: a mobile-first, audio course-based learning experience to master topics in-depth, in the time that you have while you’re ‘on the go’ — commuting, running errands or out for a jog. A university in your pocket, so to speak. Getting to work In the first nine months, we did market research, user interviews, problem validation, technical validation, established the founding team, and built an MVP. This included: 80 user interviews 40 interviews with content creators 2 prototype trials to test actual user adoption: one was a landing page that I advertised and the other was giving out calling cards for a service to turn course summaries into a podcast-like format. 10–15 conversations with investors (mainly seed investors) to gauge interest in the B2C audio space and hear feedback on the story. I had hoped these conversations would lead to a better idea of what concrete metrics investors were looking to see, but investors didn’t actually know (more on this below). Co-Founder Dating Finding a co-founder was the highest variance task. It was important and I had no idea how long it would actually take. It took three months of searching until I was introduced to the right person. I was looking for someone with a technical background in building production-ready NLP models, who cared deeply about customers and had a product-centric mindset. Most importantly, they had to have the right emotional makeup for a founder: someone who can roll with the punches, take the highs and lows together with me, be humble, incredibly good, and leave their ego at the door. My co-founder y fit the bill, and it took three months of us ‘dating’ until we were both sure of the other and that we had found what we were looking for. Gu During this entire time, we didn’t fundraise and were working on our own dime and time. Friends, Family, Fools & Funds Nine months into working on Alpe we decided to raise money. We had all the research done and better yet, a working product with a couple of hundred users and the first 2–3 audio courses. It wasn’t much more than an MVP, but it was something that worked, that we’d sweated over and spent our time and money on. And here we were hit with the critical question: should we raise money based on a deck and story or did we need to show traction metrics for our product? So I asked around and heard every possible answer: “Raise first, build later.” “Build first, raise later.” “Show a good CAC/LTV ratio.” Every possible answer out there was offered as advice. Because no one really knew, we set out to find out and raise our first round of capital. Show Me the Money It took 3.5 months and 132 prospective investors to raise $128,700 from 12 final investors. Covid hit right at the end and knocked two funds out of the picture. Out of the 132 prospective investors, half were actual Venture Capitalists (VCs), the rest were individuals who I thought could be relevant investors. We did the fundraising in batches, reaching out to prospects together and keeping as synced a timeline as possible, which you can see in the chart: starting out with as many new leads and first meetings as possible. After week 6 we stopped reaching out to new investors and simply pushed through our funnel. Finding the Right Funds Part of the preparatory work was building a list of relevant funds and personal investors. To find VCs, I found these to be most useful: : If you follow a few relevant investors on Twitter, Twitter’s recommendation engine is actually very good at suggesting other relevant investors. Twitter : is also a great database to start your search. NFX Signal We vetted our initial list of around 250 VCs based on: Whether the fund was active. It either had to make an investment in the past three months or raise capital recently. The stage and sector they focus on (based on their website). Existing investment in a competitor. Partner background: whether a partner invests in our space (B2C, media, Edtech). After vetting, we had around 80 prospective funds. Unfortunately, even after vetting, a lot of the funds we spoke to weren’t relevant. Some didn’t invest in the sector (B2C or Edtech), others didn’t invest this early or didn’t invest in Israel. Too many VCs don’t keep their website up-to-date with their actual focus, stage, and sector, which led to many wasted calls. Because I had worked in VC, I knew some of the funds and those were easiest to reach out to. For the others, we tried as hard as possible to get a warm intro from a mutual acquaintance. For those we couldn’t, we reached out cold and always personalized the outreach. There are best practices for cold outreach. Here is a guide I like⁵. Finding the Right People Searching for relevant private investors is a different game. How did I know who would be relevant? I didn’t. I reached out to everyone who I thought might be interested in investing $1,000 and up - co-workers, friends from university and the military, and extended family members. Taking money from friends & family is a difficult choice: startups are as risky an investment as there is. Are you willing to lose money for the people you care about most? On the other hand, friends and family are the people who know you best and believe in you the most. Also, if you really believe in what you’re building and the financial opportunity, who better to benefit from it than people you love? In the end, we decided that our belief in Alpe and the opportunity was enough for us to feel comfortable with approaching friends and family. We were investing everything we had in Alpe and so friends and family were welcome along (after some serious financial disclaimers and expectation alignment). Raising money from people who trusted us personally was the right call. When Covid hit in March 2020, two funds backed out. All the personal commitments stayed in. Too Early For many funds, we were , a very broad statement, since other teams in our space had raised with far less actual traction than we had. These statements - and there were many of them, constantly led us back to our initial questions: Do we need a product with actual metrics to show that we’re not ‘too early’? If so, what metrics? Alternatively, maybe improving our deck and tightening the story could be enough? too early As a former VC, I knew the answer: there is no formula. Every raise is different because every company is different, but after taking all those meetings I did start recognizing a pattern. The Three-legged Fundraise The pattern I kept seeing repeat, both as an investor and as an entrepreneur is that every investment is built on three things: Traction, Story, and . After those 200+ meetings, I’m convinced that at early stages, traction matters least⁶ and it’s all about the story and magic dust. Which runs counter to what I’d heard said by well-known investor veterans like Paul Graham & Marc Andreessen. Magic Dust Traction sounds simple but at early stages, it’s not. What traction do you show when you have no idea what your actual retention is? Or your CAC/LTV ratio? How many users are enough? What if they’re free vs paid? What’s good retention when your product is barely functioning? You get it. The numbers for traction change dramatically based on so many factors. When I started talking to investors during our market research stage, we had no numbers to speak of. Within a few months, we had hundreds of users with 30% retention, good by any measure, but they didn’t . They didn’t overwhelm investors and get them fired up to invest right now (I cover how we grew to 10,000 users ). Wow here At 7,000 users I felt a tangible difference when talking to investors, and more so when we hit 12,000, but these didn’t change fundraising materially. They still weren’t enough to get investors to ask ‘where do I sign?’. Wow Worse, the goalposts kept moving. We had 12,000 users, great, but were they paying? We had 30% retention over 90 days, great, but what about 12-month retention cohorts? When it came down to it, traction wasn’t enough, no matter what we did. It helped the story, it buttressed it, but at early stages, traction just isn’t there — it’s an early-stage company. So unless you have absolutely incredible, outstanding, out of this world, traction numbers — don’t count on your traction to seal the deal⁷. This is why MVPs should only be built to advance your product or your story. They’re not there to show a traction number: not how many people are on the waiting list or how many users downloaded your app. Stories and Magic Dust What goes into Story and Magic Dust? The problem you’re solving, market, TAM, and all that. But mostly it’s founder-market fit and the market dynamics. At early stages, investors are betting on the founders. A critical part of what goes into the story is the element of why you’ll be able to solve this problem and why now is a good time for you to do that. What’s your edge over the rest of the market? In a way, VCs are trying to de-risk. If you’re tackling a B2C play, having years of experience in design, acquiring customers, or building products at B2C companies is a way for a VC to sit back and think to themselves — . They can remove that factor as an investment risk. The more the founder can alleviate the key risks in their startup’s market, the stronger the story. it’s a hard problem but so and so knows how to do it Unfortunately at Alpe, we were missing that textbook answer. Guy and I didn’t have a B2C background. We didn’t have an educational or audio background. We’d never built an app before. Guy came from years in NLP and I came from a VC & automotive focused background. We were sorely lacking in that part of the story⁸. Magic dust is the third part of the deal and it includes those ephemeral aspects of fundraising that can make or break a company: FOMO, momentum, the right timing or lucking out, and meeting the right investor who simply loves your idea. Usually, having either a strong dose of magic dust or a strong case of founder-market fit is enough to get you on your way with the first round of capital⁹. Wrapping up: Challenges & stories Fundraising is hard. It’s a full-time job, takes dedication, thick skin, and perseverance. There is no quick and easy formula and the process is full of self-doubt and too many expert opinions. Read the blogs, do your research but trust yourself. My closing two tips are: Focus on your story and use it to help investors de-risk investing in you. Traction can be a part of that, but don’t bet on traction alone. Trust the process. Build the pipeline, run through it. Make sure you have enough shots on target to succeed. You can get 100 no's, but you only need one yes to make. Footnotes Howard Marks lays out first vs second level thinking in this wonderful memo: https://www.oaktreecapital.com/docs/default-source/memos/2015-09-09-its-not-easy.pdf Who are usually men based in Silicon Valley, hail from brand name institutions or companies (examples: Stanford, Uber, Airbnb) or repeat entrepreneurs. Although many gurus will say there is ‘A’ way. That’s not to say there aren’t many (many) useful blogs and podcasts with tips on fundraising. My favorites are the NFX articles put out by James Currier and team & ‘Both sides of the table’ blog by Mark Suster. This will be the third in a series of detailed posts tracking our progress at Alpe Audio, sharing metrics and topics that I’d have wanted to be out there. Part 1 & Part 2 describe how we grew to 10,000 users. Liron Azrielant of Meron Capital lays out her bullish case for cold outreach and best practices. With one caveat: Traction doesn’t matter in as much as it doesn’t contribute to the story. If it helps you prove some key point and is part of the de-risking your story, then it definitely does matter. For example if we had had the traction that assuaged the fears investors had around us as a founding team (that we were missing a B2C background), it would have been useful to have the traction to de-risk that. But for that we needed outstanding traction numbers (see footnote 7 on what outstanding traction numbers are). What are incredible traction numbers? These numbers from Snapchat’s early days that Jeremy Liew shared on 20VC with Harry Stebbings blew my mind: “In March/April of 2012, they had about 90,000 daily active users off the base of 180,000 installs.” That’s 50% retention measured in DAUs off a huge base. Wow. We actually are a good fit to found Alpe, just not a textbook fit. Alpe brings together many different disciplines: B2C, product, audio storytelling & production, education, cognitive science and NLP among others. There is no founder or founders who cover all these areas — autodidacts are what’s needed. Assuming the rest of your story is in the normal bounds of startup fundraising: relevant market, strong ‘why now’ and good access to capital. A contrary example is raising a B2C early stage round in Israel — most Israeli VCs focus on B2B, and so access to capital for pre-seed/seed B2C companies in Israel isn’t good. First published here