paint-brush
Why Multimodal AI is the Future of LLMsby@FrederikBussler
156 reads

Why Multimodal AI is the Future of LLMs

by Frederik BusslerOctober 27th, 2024
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story w/o Javascript
tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

Multimodal AI models like Mississippi are the future of AI. They let you analyze text, images, and documents all at the same time.
featured image - Why Multimodal AI is the Future of LLMs
Frederik Bussler HackerNoon profile picture

As humans, we don't usually give much thought to how we think or metacognition. But for AI researchers, understanding how our brains seamlessly combine visual and linguistic processing is a big challenge. So far, most AI models do one or the other - they're either vision models that can recognize objects and scenes or language models that can understand and generate text. The integration of these capabilities has remained elusive.


That's what makes H2O.ai's new Mississippi models so interesting. Released last week as open source, these small but powerful models - Mississippi 2B and its even tinier companion Mississippi 0.8B - show serious skill at processing both images and text together in ways that feel human-like.


A few years ago, I wrote an article highlighting model progression in OpenAI’s GPT series. The now ancient GPT -2 model (in AI industry speed) had just 1.5 billion parameters, but by today’s standards, it produces terrible quality outputs. The benefit of such a small model, however, is that it’s incredibly cheap, fast, and private. No need to upload things to the cloud when you can run a model locally. Mississippi is similarly sized to that age-old GPT-2, but now with incredible accuracy and multimodal capabilities. Simply put, you can get the best of both worlds: Accuracy in a cost-effective and cheap package.


The smaller version of the two is particularly intriguing. With just 800,000 parameters (compared to GPT-4's hundreds of billions), Mississippi 0.8B is outperforming models 20 times its size at tasks like extracting text from images. It's doing more with far less.

The Secrets in the Tiles

The magic happens in how these models process visual information. Rather than trying to swallow whole images at once, they break them down into manageable 448x448 pixel tiles. Think of it like how you might solve a complex puzzle - instead of getting overwhelmed by the whole picture, you work on small sections at a time.


This tiling approach lets the models maintain high accuracy while keeping computational needs surprisingly modest. A standard laptop can run these models effectively - no need for warehouse-sized data centers or specialized hardware.


The training process is equally clever. Mississippi 2B learned from 17.2 million examples of images paired with questions and answers about them, while the smaller 0.8B version actually got more training data - 19 million examples. It's like they compensated for the model's smaller size by teaching it more thoroughly.

Why This Matters More Than You Think

We're at an interesting inflection point in AI development. While the headlines focus on ever-larger language models, there's a growing recognition that bigger isn't always better. What matters more is how effectively a model can handle real-world tasks.


Think about all the visual information we process daily that also contains text - receipts, documents, diagrams, charts, signs, and handwritten notes. Being able to understand both the visual layout and the textual content simultaneously is crucial for practical AI applications.


Mississippi handles these tasks with remarkable grace. It can extract structured data from scanned receipts, understand complex diagrams, read handwritten text, and even package the extracted information into formats like JSON that other software can easily use.


This isn't just about technical capabilities - it's about accessibility. When powerful AI tools become this efficient and lightweight, they become available to a much wider range of users and applications. Small businesses that couldn't afford massive computing resources can now automate document processing. Researchers with limited budgets can analyze large collections of visual data. Developers can build sophisticated applications without requiring users to have high-end hardware.


The release of these models on Hugging Face means we're likely to see a wave of innovative applications building on this foundation. It's a reminder that some of the most important advances in AI aren't about raw power - they're about finding smarter ways to approach problems.


In a field often obsessed with size and scale, Mississippi shows that careful design and efficient architecture can trump brute force. It's not just a technical achievement - it's a philosophical statement about the future direction of AI development. Sometimes the most impressive innovations aren't the ones that make the loudest noise but the ones that fundamentally change how we approach problems.