TL;DR: Bad function names will lead you to defects
Some names in immature languages break the bijection principle.
When you use them, you agree on some semantics that are not the actual behavior.
Consequently, you must know accidental implementations to avoid this defect.
const pets = '😺🐶😺';
const justDogs = pets.replace('😺', '🐩');
const catsArePresent = justDogs.includes('😺');
// returns true
const pets = '😺🐶😺';
const justDogs = pets.replaceAll('😺', '🐩');
// Or
const justDogs = pets.replace(/😺/g, '');
const catsArePresent = justDogs.includes('😺');
// returns false
You can search and forbid the usage of replace() in your code and define replaceFirst() if you need to change only the first occurrence
All generators avoided this problem.
ChatGPT and Copilot use Regular Expressions to solve the problem.
Gemini and Claude failed to spot the mistake.
None of them use replaceAll() (introduced in ES2021)
Using replace() instead of replaceAll() would not fully achieve the intended result of replacing all occurrences.
It would only replace the first occurrence, potentially leading to incorrect behavior if there are multiple occurrences.
Code Smell 38 - Abstract Names
Code Smell 41 - Regular Expression Abusers
What exactly is a name - Part II Rehab
Code Smells are my opinion.
Photo by Jari Hytönen on Unsplash
We must not blame programmers for their bugs. They belong to them only until the code is merged to the repository. After that, all bugs are ours!
Yegor Bugayenko
Software Engineering Great Quotes
This article is part of the CodeSmell Series.