The New York Times Sued OpenAI Only After ChatGPT Became Popular

The New York Times Company v. OpenAI Update Court Filing, retrieved on February 26, 2024 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This part is 7 of 15. F. The Times Files Suit It was only after this rapid adoption, along with reports of the value unlocked by these new technologies, that the Times claimed that OpenAI had “infringed its copyright[s]” and reached out to demand “commercial terms.” Compl. ¶¶ 54, 126. After months of discussions, the Times filed suit two days after Christmas, demanding “billions of dollars.” Id. ¶ 9. In its suit, the Times now claims ChatGPT will be the end of “independent journalism.” Id. ¶¶ 2, 47. Its chief complaint is that OpenAI “use[s]” news articles to build a service the world has never before seen that, according to the Times, might “steal [its] audiences.” Id. ¶¶ 2, 8. And its core legal theory is that copyright—a law singularly devoted to the “Progress of Science and useful Arts,” U.S. CONST. art. 1, § 8, cl. 8—should protect it from that technological innovation. Continue Reading Here. About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case retrieved on February 26, 2024, from fingfx.thomsonreuters.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. The New York Times Company v. OpenAI Update Court Filing, retrieved on February 26, 2024 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This part is 7 of 15. The New York Times Company v. OpenAI Update Court Filing, retrieved on February 26, 2024 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series . You can jump to any part in this filing here . This part is 7 of 15. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here here F. The Times Files Suit It was only after this rapid adoption, along with reports of the value unlocked by these new technologies, that the Times claimed that OpenAI had “infringed its copyright[s]” and reached out to demand “commercial terms.” Compl. ¶¶ 54, 126. After months of discussions, the Times filed suit two days after Christmas, demanding “billions of dollars.” Id. ¶ 9. In its suit, the Times now claims ChatGPT will be the end of “independent journalism.” Id. ¶¶ 2, 47. Its chief complaint is that OpenAI “use[s]” news articles to build a service the world has never before seen that, according to the Times, might “steal [its] audiences.” Id. ¶¶ 2, 8. And its core legal theory is that copyright—a law singularly devoted to the “Progress of Science and useful Arts,” U.S. CONST. art. 1, § 8, cl. 8—should protect it from that technological innovation. Continue Reading Here. Continue Reading Here . Here About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case retrieved on February 26, 2024, from fingfx.thomsonreuters.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case retrieved on February 26, 2024, from fingfx.thomsonreuters.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. fingfx.thomsonreuters.com

The New York Times Sued OpenAI Only After ChatGPT Became Popular

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Untitled Story

Judge Rules Anthropic’s Use of Books for AI Training Was Legal, but Pirated Copies Raise Liability

Because It Cannot Sue ChatGPT For Mimicry, the NYT Lawsuit Focuses on AI Hallucination Instead

ChatGPT Never Produced "Wholesale Copies" of NYT's Articles

ChatGPT's Predecessor Could Translate French Even Though It Was Not Trained to Do So

ChatGPT's Predecessor Was Trained on 'Filtered' Internet Data from an Open Source Repository

Judge Rules Anthropic’s Use of Books for AI Training Was Legal, but Pirated Copies Raise Liability

Because It Cannot Sue ChatGPT For Mimicry, the NYT Lawsuit Focuses on AI Hallucination Instead

ChatGPT Never Produced "Wholesale Copies" of NYT's Articles

ChatGPT's Predecessor Could Translate French Even Though It Was Not Trained to Do So

ChatGPT's Predecessor Was Trained on 'Filtered' Internet Data from an Open Source Repository

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps