The New York Times Company v. OpenAI Update Court Filing, retrieved on February 26, 2024 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing
It was only after this rapid adoption, along with reports of the value unlocked by these new technologies, that the Times claimed that OpenAI had “infringed its copyright[s]” and reached out to demand “commercial terms.” Compl. ¶¶ 54, 126. After months of discussions, the Times filed suit two days after Christmas, demanding “billions of dollars.” Id. ¶ 9.
In its suit, the Times now claims ChatGPT will be the end of “independent journalism.” Id. ¶¶ 2, 47. Its chief complaint is that OpenAI “use[s]” news articles to build a service the world has never before seen that, according to the Times, might “steal [its] audiences.” Id. ¶¶ 2, 8. And its core legal theory is that copyright—a law singularly devoted to the “Progress of Science and useful Arts,” U.S. CONST. art. 1, § 8, cl. 8—should protect it from that technological innovation.
Continue Reading Here.
About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.
This court case retrieved on February 26, 2024, from fingfx.thomsonreuters.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.