4 Calvo Framework and 4.1 Household’s Problem
4.3 Household Equilibrium Conditions
4.5 Nominal Equilibrium Conditions
4.6 Real Equilibrium Conditions and 4.7 Shocks
5.2 Persistence and Policy Puzzles
6 Stochastic Equilibrium and 6.1 Ergodic Theory and Random Dynamical Systems
7 General Linearized Phillips Curve
8 Existence Results and 8.1 Main Results
9.2 Algebraic Aspects (I) Singularities and Covers
9.3 Algebraic Aspects (II) Homology
9.4 Algebraic Aspects (III) Schemes
9.5 Wider Economic Interpretations
10 Econometric and Theoretical Implications and 10.1 Identification and Trade-offs
10.4 Microeconomic Interpretation
Appendices
A Proof of Theorem 2 and A.1 Proof of Part (i)
B Proofs from Section 4 and B.1 Individual Product Demand (4.2)
B.2 Flexible Price Equilibrium and ZINSS (4.4)
B.4 Cost Minimization (4.6) and (10.4)
C Proofs from Section 5, and C.1 Puzzles, Policy and Persistence
D Stochastic Equilibrium and D.1 Non-Stochastic Equilibrium
D.2 Profits and Long-Run Growth
E Slopes and Eigenvalues and E.1 Slope Coefficients
E.4 Rouche’s Theorem Conditions
F Abstract Algebra and F.1 Homology Groups
F.4 Marginal Costs and Inflation
G Further Keynesian Models and G.1 Taylor Pricing
G.3 Unconventional Policy Settings
H Empirical Robustness and H.1 Parameter Selection
I Additional Evidence and I.1 Other Structural Parameters
I.3 Trend Inflation Volatility
I finish by characterizing the state space form of the non-linear model. It is not possible to find a closed form but I am able to find a recursive form by inverting expressions for the recursive term ℵ. It reveals that economic dynamics are generically persistent. Present inflation depends on its lag and that of both the structural shocks. This is because the non-linear New Keynesian has a hybrid form. This is true µ almost everywhere. This motivates the bifurcation analysis.
Remark 1. This is an application of the original recursive equilibrium formulation of Prescott and Mehra [1980] and Mehra [2006], with the canonical form playing the role of the policy function, associated with a planners problem Crucially, this formal approach has hitherto been missing from New Keynesian economics.
Remark 2. The transversality condition is used to resist additional terms in bubbly assets entering.
Remark 3. This result means infinite dimensional methods will be unnecessary to solve or approximate this model and should extend to other DSGE.
Subsequent business will focus on which of these variables are first order around ZINSS and why approximations at ZINSS differ.
Author:
(1) David Staines.
This paper is available on arxiv under CC 4.0 license.