Author: (1) Laurence Francis Lacey, Lacey Solutions Ltd, Skerries, County Dublin, Ireland. Editor's Note: This is Part 4 of 7 of a study on how changes in the money supply, economic growth, and savings levels affect inflation. Read the rest below. Table of Links Abstract and 1 Introduction Methods 2.1 Statistical Methodology 2.2 US Time Series Data 2.3 Hyperinflation Model Results 3.1 Characterisation of Price Inflation 3.2 Characterisation of Hyperinflation in the Weimar Republic (1922 to 1923) 4. Discussion 5. Conclusion, Supplementary materials, Acknowledgements, and References Appendix 3.1 Characterisation of Price Inflation A plot of the natural log-transformed US BMS time series over the period 2001 to 2019 is given in Figure 1. The year 2001 is the reference year (time = 0), and the BMS data were expressed relative to the value obtained in year 2001. The corresponding plots for the natural log-transformed US CPI time series is given in Figure 2; the natural log-transformed US real GDP time series is given in Figure 3; the natural log-transformed average American household savings time series is given in Figure 4 The average annual rate of growth of the US BMS, over the period 2001 to 2019, was 5.7%, with: The average annual rate of US price inflation as measured by CPI, over the period 2001 to 2019, was 2.2%, with: ๐ฃ๐ถ๐๐ผ(๐ก) = 0.0217 x t The average annual rate of growth of the US real GDP, over the period 2001 to 2019, was 2.0%, with: ๐ฃ๐บ๐ท๐(๐ก) = 0.0197 x t The average annual rate of growth of American household savings, over the period 2001 to 2019, was 1.0%, with: ๐ฃ๐๐ด๐(๐ก) = 0.0095 x t The linear regression fits are summarised in Table 1. BMS, broad money supply; CPI, consumer price index; GDP, (real) gross domestic product; SAV, average American household savings; df, degrees of freedom Henceforth, the annual US household savings estimates for the years not available were imputed, using the regression fit obtained from the available years of data. The residual time series (RES(t)) was obtained from the relationship: ๐ ๐ธ๐(๐ก) = ๐ฃ๐ต๐๐(๐ก) โ ๐ฃ๐บ๐ท๐(๐ก) โ ๐ฃ๐๐ด๐(๐ก) โ ๐ฃ๐ถ๐๐ผ This residual time series is plotted in Figure 5. The average annual rate of growth of the residual time series (RES(t)), over the period 2001 to 2019, was 0.5%, with: ๐ ๐ธ๐(๐ก) = 0.0046 x t This gives: ๐ฃ๐ถ๐๐ผ(๐ก) = ๐ฃ๐ต๐๐(๐ก) โ ๐ฃ๐บ๐ท๐(๐ก) โ ๐ฃ๐๐ด๐(๐ก) โ ๐ ๐ธ๐(๐ก) Further detail of the residual time series (RES(t)), over the period 2001 to 2019, are given in Table 2. RES, residual time series; df, degrees of freedom This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED license. Author: (1) Laurence Francis Lacey, Lacey Solutions Ltd, Skerries, County Dublin, Ireland. Author: Author: (1) Laurence Francis Lacey, Lacey Solutions Ltd, Skerries, County Dublin, Ireland. Editor's Note: This is Part 4 of 7 of a study on how changes in the money supply, economic growth, and savings levels affect inflation. Read the rest below. Editor's Note: This is Part 4 of 7 of a study on how changes in the money supply, economic growth, and savings levels affect inflation. Read the rest below. Editor's Note: This is Part 4 of 7 of a study on how changes in the money supply, economic growth, and savings levels affect inflation. Read the rest below. Editor's Note: This is Part 4 of 7 of a study on how changes in the money supply, economic growth, and savings levels affect inflation. Read the rest below. Table of Links Abstract and 1 Introduction Methods 2.1 Statistical Methodology 2.2 US Time Series Data 2.3 Hyperinflation Model Results 3.1 Characterisation of Price Inflation 3.2 Characterisation of Hyperinflation in the Weimar Republic (1922 to 1923) 4. Discussion 5. Conclusion, Supplementary materials, Acknowledgements, and References Appendix Abstract and 1 Introduction Abstract and 1 Introduction Methods Methods Methods 2.1 Statistical Methodology 2.1 Statistical Methodology 2.2 US Time Series Data 2.2 US Time Series Data 2.3 Hyperinflation Model 2.3 Hyperinflation Model Results Results Results 3.1 Characterisation of Price Inflation 3.1 Characterisation of Price Inflation 3.2 Characterisation of Hyperinflation in the Weimar Republic (1922 to 1923) 3.2 Characterisation of Hyperinflation in the Weimar Republic (1922 to 1923) 4. Discussion 4. Discussion 5. Conclusion, Supplementary materials, Acknowledgements, and References Appendix 5. Conclusion, Supplementary materials, Acknowledgements, and References Appendix Appendix 3.1 Characterisation of Price Inflation A plot of the natural log-transformed US BMS time series over the period 2001 to 2019 is given in Figure 1. The year 2001 is the reference year (time = 0), and the BMS data were expressed relative to the value obtained in year 2001. The corresponding plots for the natural log-transformed US CPI time series is given in Figure 2; the natural log-transformed US real GDP time series is given in Figure 3; the natural log-transformed average American household savings time series is given in Figure 4 The average annual rate of growth of the US BMS, over the period 2001 to 2019, was 5.7%, with: The average annual rate of US price inflation as measured by CPI, over the period 2001 to 2019, was 2.2%, with: ๐ฃ๐ถ๐๐ผ(๐ก) = 0.0217 x t The average annual rate of growth of the US real GDP, over the period 2001 to 2019, was 2.0%, with: ๐ฃ๐บ๐ท๐(๐ก) = 0.0197 x t The average annual rate of growth of American household savings, over the period 2001 to 2019, was 1.0%, with: ๐ฃ๐๐ด๐(๐ก) = 0.0095 x t The linear regression fits are summarised in Table 1. BMS, broad money supply; CPI, consumer price index; GDP, (real) gross domestic product; SAV, average American household savings; df, degrees of freedom Henceforth, the annual US household savings estimates for the years not available were imputed, using the regression fit obtained from the available years of data. The residual time series (RES(t)) was obtained from the relationship: ๐ ๐ธ๐(๐ก) = ๐ฃ๐ต๐๐(๐ก) โ ๐ฃ๐บ๐ท๐(๐ก) โ ๐ฃ๐๐ด๐(๐ก) โ ๐ฃ๐ถ๐๐ผ This residual time series is plotted in Figure 5. The average annual rate of growth of the residual time series (RES(t)), over the period 2001 to 2019, was 0.5%, with: ๐ ๐ธ๐(๐ก) = 0.0046 x t This gives: ๐ฃ๐ถ๐๐ผ(๐ก) = ๐ฃ๐ต๐๐(๐ก) โ ๐ฃ๐บ๐ท๐(๐ก) โ ๐ฃ๐๐ด๐(๐ก) โ ๐ ๐ธ๐(๐ก) Further detail of the residual time series (RES(t)), over the period 2001 to 2019, are given in Table 2. RES, residual time series; df, degrees of freedom This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED license. This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED license. available on arxiv