Uncovering Oregon State Law Violations by Amazon

COUNT XVII: VIOLATIONS OF OREGON STATE LAW

524. Plaintiff State of Oregon, acting by and through its Attorney General, Ellen Rosenblum (the “State of Oregon”), repeats and re-alleges and incorporates by reference each and every preceding paragraph and allegation of this Complaint as if fully set forth herein.

525. The acts alleged in the Complaint also constitute violations of the Oregon Antitrust Law, Oregon Revised Statutes (“ORS”) 646.705 to ORS 646.836. These violations had impacts within the State of Oregon and substantially affected the people of Oregon.

526. The State of Oregon appears in its sovereign or quasi-sovereign capacities and under its statutory, common law, and equitable powers pursuant to Section 4 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 4, Section 16 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 26, and the Oregon Antitrust Law including ORS 646.760 and ORS 646.770. The State of Oregon seeks equitable and injunctive relief under federal law and the Oregon Antitrust Law, including, without limitation, the following:

(a) Equitable relief pursuant to federal law including Section 4 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 4, and pursuant to state law including ORS 646.770;

(b) Injunctive relief pursuant to Section 16 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 26, ORS 646.760, and ORS 646.770;

(c) The cost of suit, including expert witness fees, costs of investigation, and attorney’s fees, pursuant to Section 16 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 26, ORS 646.760, and ORS 646.770; and

(d) Other remedies as the Court may deem appropriate under the facts and circumstances of the case.