SEC v. Terraform Court Filing, retrieved on February 16, 2023, is part of . You can jump to any part in this filing . This is part 8 of 38. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here I. Defendants Created and Developed the Terraform Ecosystem. 31. In March 2018, Defendants began creating the Terraform ecosystem. Kwon and Terraform's co-founder published a white paper announcing the Terraform blockchain (referred to as the "Terra protocol") and the LUNA token, the first crypto asset created by Terraform. Eventually, the ecosystem would come to include a series of interconnected crypto assets whose purported adoption, liquidity, and value became highly dependent on the public's willingness to buy into Terraform and Kwon's blockchain empire. 32. In April 2019, Kwon and others published another white paper, entitled "Terra Money: Stability and Adoption," that announced the adoption of so-called “stable-coins," including one later named UST, which Terraform described as the "lynchpin" of Defendants" interrelated "ecosystem" of crypto assets. 33. In the April 2019 white paper and elsewhere, Defendants stated that UST's value was pegged to the U.S. dollar by virtue of an algorithm tying UST's value to LUNA. Specifically, this algorithm sought to maintain UST's price at $1.00 through a complex system in which, rather than being backed by actual dollars, UST would be created, or "minted," and "burned," or destroyed, in parallel with Terraform's companion token, LUNA. For example, holders of LUNA could swap $1.00 worth of LUNA for I UST based on LUNA's then-current market price. And holders of UST could likewise exchange 1 UST for $1.00 worth of LUNA. The algorithm theoretically provided an arbitrage opportunity for traders to help keep the price of UST pegged at one dollar. If, for example, UST slipped to $0.95, traders could buy UST at that price and exchange it for $1 of LUNA "burning" UST and "minting" LUNA. Doing so reduced the supply of UST and, in theory, would increase its price until it reached a dollar. 34. On or about April 24, 2019, Terraform and Kwon officially launched the Terraform blockchain and created one billion LUNA tokens. Kwon wrote the code underlying the initial version of the blockchain. As described in more detail below, Terraform and Kwon offered and sold LUNA to investors to raise funds to develop the Terraform blockchain and ecosystem. During the Relevant Period, Terraform maintained over a hundred code repositories that enabled Terraform employees, including Kwon, to create, contribute, maintain, and update the Terraform blockchain protocols. 35. Throughout the Relevant Period, Terraform and Kwon continued to develop and market the Terraform blockchain and related protocols and crypto assets, which they promoted as profit opportunities for investors. In September 2020, for example, Terraform and Kwon began publicly marketing UST as a "yield bearing" stablecoin together with something they called the Anchor Protocol. Terraform launched the Anchor Protocol in March 2021, with Defendants advertising rates of return of 19-20% on investors' deposited UST, leading to significant investor demand for UST. 36. The total amount of UST, which was first "minted" in June 2019, was slow to grow, with under 300 million UST circulating by early 2021. In the 2 months following the launch of the Anchor Protocol, the number of UST in circulation increased by close to one billion. By May 2022, there were approximately 19 billion UST, with 14 billion deposited in the Anchor Protocol. 37. Over time, Defendants created other protocols and crypto asset securities. In December 2020, Defendants launched the "Mirror Protocol," which they continued to develop and maintain. The Mirror Protocol allowed users to create what Terraform called an "mAsset," short for "mirrored asset", which was designed to track or "mirror" the price of equity securities or other types of securities, including U.S. equity securities. For example, mAssets designed to "mirror" the stock of Apple, Inc. were named "mAAPL" and were designed so that their value increased and decreased with the value of Apple, Inc. stock. As Terraform explained on its website, "mAssets mimic the price behavior of real-world assets and give traders anywhere in the world open access to price exposure without the burdens of owning or transacting real assets." 38. The Mirror Protocol also provided users with the ability to obtain a "MIR token," the so-called "governance token"[2] for the Mirror Protocol. MIR tokens received value based upon, among other things, fees generated under the Mirror Protocol. [2] "Governance tokens" are tokens that can, among other features, purportedly give their holders voting power over the development and structure of the protocol or blockchain, including the right to propose changes. Continue Reading . Here About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case 1:23-cv-01346 retrieved on September 12, 2023, from is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. sec.gov

Terraform Offered and Sold Its Crypto Assets as Securities

The Government's Definition of Crypto Asset, Blockchain, and Smart Contracts

Read My Stories

Too Long; Didn't Read

Boost your HackerNoon story @ $159.99! 🚀

The Creation of the Terraform Ecosystem: How Do Kwon Did It

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Untitled Story

A Comprehensive List of Every Single Violation Terraform Labs and Do Kwon Committed

Do Kwon and Terraform Gave Investors A Reasonable Expectation of Profits: How They Talked LUNA Up

SEC v. Terraform: Even If Some Violations Occured Outside the U.S., the Court Has Jurisdiction

SEC v. Terraform Labs: Meet the Defendants

Terraform Was Selling a Security-Based Swap to People Who Were Not Eligible Contract Participants

A Comprehensive List of Every Single Violation Terraform Labs and Do Kwon Committed

Do Kwon and Terraform Gave Investors A Reasonable Expectation of Profits: How They Talked LUNA Up

SEC v. Terraform: Even If Some Violations Occured Outside the U.S., the Court Has Jurisdiction

SEC v. Terraform Labs: Meet the Defendants

Terraform Was Selling a Security-Based Swap to People Who Were Not Eligible Contract Participants

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps