DOE v. Github (original complaint) Court Filing, retrieved on November 3, 2022 is part of . You can jump to any part in this filing . This is part 34 of 37. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here VIII. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF COUNT XI CIVIL CONSPIRACY Common Law (Against All Defendants) 235. Plaintiffs and the Class hereby repeat and incorporate by reference each preceding and succeeding paragraph as though fully set forth herein. 236. On information and belief, Microsoft, GitHub, OpenAI, and the Individual Defendants have worked together to create Copilot. In creating Copilot, Defendants willfully avoided determining whether and how Copilot’s training and Output may violate the rights of Plaintiffs and the Class and other stakeholders. This is because Defendants understood that through Copilot they would be engaging in a variety of unlawful conduct. Defendants conduct resulted in violations of Plaintiffs’ and the Class’s rights as set forth herein. 237. On information and belief, OpenAI derives a financial or other valuable benefit from the sale of Copilot. In exchange, OpenAI provided Microsoft an exclusive license to use its GPT-3 language model. 238. On information and belief, Microsoft derives a financial benefit from sales of Copilot through payments or other form of compensation in exchange for GitHub’s and OpenAI’s use of Azure to run Copilot. 239. GitHub, Microsoft, and OpenAI agreed to a common plan or design to create, sell, and run Copilot to commit and conceal the following tortious acts: a. Violations of Plaintiffs’ and the Class’s rights under the DMCA Section 1202; b. Tortious interference in Plaintiffs’ and the Class’s contractual relations with users of their code; c. Passing off Copilot’s Output as originating either from Copilot itself or from Defendants; d. Unfair competition with Plaintiffs and the Class by releasing and operating Copilot; and e. Privacy violations, namely violation of the CCPA and negligent handling of personal information. Continue Reading . Here About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case 3:22-cv-06823-KAW retrieved on September 5, 2023, from is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. Storage.Courtlistener

DOE v. GitHub: Plaintiffs Seek Declaratory Relief Against All Defendants

FTC v Binance: Binance Accused of Helping This Firm Evade Its Compliance Controls

Too Long; Didn't Read

Boost your HackerNoon story @ $159.99! 🚀

The Copilot Conspiracy: Claims of Collaboration and Legal Breaches by Tech Giants

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Untitled Story

20% of All General Searches in the U.S. Go Through the Default on User-Downloaded Version of Chrome

A History of OpenAI's Relationship With Microsoft

A Third Example of GitHub Copilot (Allegedly) Reproducing the Code of Others

AI-Generated Code and Copyright Infringement: Codex’s Attribution Problem

Allegations of Copyright Infringement by GitHub Copilot

20% of All General Searches in the U.S. Go Through the Default on User-Downloaded Version of Chrome

A History of OpenAI's Relationship With Microsoft

A Third Example of GitHub Copilot (Allegedly) Reproducing the Code of Others

AI-Generated Code and Copyright Infringement: Codex’s Attribution Problem

Allegations of Copyright Infringement by GitHub Copilot

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps