Table of Links Abstract Abstract Keywords and 2. Introduction


Set up


From Classical Results into Differential Machine Learning
4.1 Risk Neutral Valuation Approach
4.2 Differential Machine learning: building the loss function


Example: Digital Options


Choice of Basis
6.1 Limitations of the Fixed-basis
6.2 Parametric Basis: Neural Networks


Simulation-European Call Option
7.1 Black-Scholes
7.2 Hedging Experiment
7.3 Least Squares Monte Carlo Algorithm
7.4 Differential Machine Learning Algorithm


Numerical Results


Conclusion


Conflict of Interests Statement and References Keywords and 2. Introduction Keywords and 2. Introduction Keywords and 2. Introduction Set up Set up Set up From Classical Results into Differential Machine Learning
4.1 Risk Neutral Valuation Approach
4.2 Differential Machine learning: building the loss function From Classical Results into Differential Machine Learning 4.1 Risk Neutral Valuation Approach 4.1 Risk Neutral Valuation Approach 4.2 Differential Machine learning: building the loss function 4.2 Differential Machine learning: building the loss function Example: Digital Options Example: Digital Options Example: Digital Options Choice of Basis
6.1 Limitations of the Fixed-basis
6.2 Parametric Basis: Neural Networks Choice of Basis Choice of Basis 6.1 Limitations of the Fixed-basis 6.1 Limitations of the Fixed-basis 6.2 Parametric Basis: Neural Networks 6.2 Parametric Basis: Neural Networks Simulation-European Call Option
7.1 Black-Scholes
7.2 Hedging Experiment
7.3 Least Squares Monte Carlo Algorithm
7.4 Differential Machine Learning Algorithm Simulation-European Call Option 7.1 Black-Scholes 7.1 Black-Scholes 7.2 Hedging Experiment 7.2 Hedging Experiment 7.3 Least Squares Monte Carlo Algorithm 7.3 Least Squares Monte Carlo Algorithm 7.4 Differential Machine Learning Algorithm 7.4 Differential Machine Learning Algorithm Numerical Results Numerical Results Numerical Results Conclusion Conclusion Conclusion Conflict of Interests Statement and References Conflict of Interests Statement and References Conflict of Interests Statement and References Notes Notes 6 Choice of Basis A parametric basis can be thought of as a set of functions made up of linear combinations of relatively few basis functions with a simple structure and depending non-linearly on a set of “inner” parameters e.g., feed-forward neural networks with one hidden layer and linear output activation units. In contrast, classical approximation schemes do not use inner parameters but employ fixed basis functions, and the corresponding approximators exhibit only a linear dependence on the external parameters. However, experience has shown that optimization of functionals over a variable basis such as feed-forward neural networks often provides surprisingly good suboptimal solutions. A well-known functional-analytical fact is the employing the Stone-Weierstrass theorem, it is possible to construct several examples of fixed basis, such as the monomial basis, a set that is dense in the space of continuous function whose completion is L2. The limitations of the fixed basis are well studied and can be summarized as the following. 6.1 Limitations of the Fixed-basis The variance-bias trade-off can be translated into two major problems: Underfitting happens due to the fact that high bias can cause an algorithm to miss the relevant relations between features and target outputs. This happens with a small number of parameters. In the previous terminology, that corresponds to a low d value (see Equation 4).


The variance is an error of sensitivity to small fluctuations in the training set. It is a measure of spread or variations in our predictions. High variance can cause an algorithm to model the random noise in the training data, rather than the intended outputs, which is denominated as overfitting. This, in turn, happens with a high number of parameters. In the previous terminology, that corresponds to a high d value (see Equation 4). Underfitting happens due to the fact that high bias can cause an algorithm to miss the relevant relations between features and target outputs. This happens with a small number of parameters. In the previous terminology, that corresponds to a low d value (see Equation 4). Underfitting happens due to the fact that high bias can cause an algorithm to miss the relevant relations between features and target outputs. This happens with a small number of parameters. In the previous terminology, that corresponds to a low d value (see Equation 4). The variance is an error of sensitivity to small fluctuations in the training set. It is a measure of spread or variations in our predictions. High variance can cause an algorithm to model the random noise in the training data, rather than the intended outputs, which is denominated as overfitting. This, in turn, happens with a high number of parameters. In the previous terminology, that corresponds to a high d value (see Equation 4). The variance is an error of sensitivity to small fluctuations in the training set. It is a measure of spread or variations in our predictions. High variance can cause an algorithm to model the random noise in the training data, rather than the intended outputs, which is denominated as overfitting. This, in turn, happens with a high number of parameters. In the previous terminology, that corresponds to a high d value (see Equation 4). The following result resumes the problem discussed. I will state it as in Barron, 1993, and the proof can be found in Barron, 1993 and Gnecco et al., 2012 So, there is a need to study the class of basis, that can adjust to the data. That is the case with the parametric basis. 6.2 Parametric Basis: Neural Networks From Hornik et al., 1989, we find the following relevant results: The flexibility and approximation power of neural networks makes them an excellent choice as the parametric basis. 6.2.1 Depth 6.2.1 Depth In practical applications, it has been noted that a multi-layer neural network, outperforms a single-layer neural network. This is still a question under investigation, once the top-of-the-art mathematical theories cannot account for the multi-layer comparative success. However, it is possible to create some counter-examples, where the single-layer neural network would not approach the target function as in the following proposition: Therefore it is beneficial or at least risk-averse to select a multi-layer feed-forward neural network, instead of a single-layer feed-forward neural network 6.2.2 Width 6.2.2 Width This section draws inspiration from the works Barron, 1993 andTelgarsky, 2020. Its primary objective is to investigate the approximating capabilities of a neural network based on the number of nodes or neurons. I provide some elaboration on this result, once it is not so well known and it does not require any assumption regarding the activation function unlike in Barron, 1994. This sampling procedure correctly represents the mean as: As the number of nodes, d, increases, the approximation capability improves. This result, contrary to Proposition 5.1, establishes an upper bound that is independent of the dimension of the target function. By comparing both theorems, it can be argued that there is a clear advantage for feed-forward neural networks when d > 2 for d ∈ N. Author:
(1) Pedro Duarte Gomes, Department of Mathematics, University of Copenhagen. Author: Author: (1) Pedro Duarte Gomes, Department of Mathematics, University of Copenhagen. This paper is available on arxiv under CC by 4.0 Deed (Attribution 4.0 International) license. This paper is available on arxiv under CC by 4.0 Deed (Attribution 4.0 International) license. available on arxiv available on arxiv

Part of HackerNoon's growing list of open-source research papers, promoting free access to academic material.

Mathematics of Differential Machine Learning in Derivative Pricing and Hedging: Choice of Basis

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

A Novel Framework for Analyzing Economic News Narratives Using GPT-3.5: Abstract and Intro

It Is Okay If You Don't Know What You Like. We Do (feat. Deep Recommendation Algorithms)

10 Machine Learning, Data Science, and Deep Learning Courses for Programmers in 2020

10 Computer Vision Startups on Product Hunt with the Most Upvotes

10 Best Entry Level Machine Learning Tutorials

10 Best + Free Machine Learning Courses Collection

A Novel Framework for Analyzing Economic News Narratives Using GPT-3.5: Abstract and Intro

It Is Okay If You Don't Know What You Like. We Do (feat. Deep Recommendation Algorithms)

10 Machine Learning, Data Science, and Deep Learning Courses for Programmers in 2020

10 Computer Vision Startups on Product Hunt with the Most Upvotes

10 Best Entry Level Machine Learning Tutorials

10 Best + Free Machine Learning Courses Collection

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Minty

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps