paint-brush
Amazon Accused of Violating ROSCA with Nonconsensual Enrollmentby@linakhantakesamazon

Amazon Accused of Violating ROSCA with Nonconsensual Enrollment

tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

=uh oh, that doesn't sound good does it

People Mentioned

Mention Thumbnail
featured image - Amazon Accused of Violating ROSCA with Nonconsensual Enrollment
Lina Khan (Finally) Sues Amazon HackerNoon profile picture

FTC v. Amazon Court Filing, retrieved on Sep 26, 2023, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This part is 12 of 20.

COUNT III - Violation of ROSCA—Nonconsensual Enrollment

261. In numerous instances, in connection with charging consumers for goods or services sold in transactions effected on the Internet through a negative option feature, as described in Paragraphs 2 through 224 above, Defendant failed to obtain the consumer’s express informed consent before charging the consumer’s credit card, debit card, bank account, or other financial account for the transaction.


262. Defendant’s practices as set forth in Paragraph 261 are violations of Section 4 of ROSCA, 15 U.S.C. § 8403(2), and are therefore violations of a rule promulgated under Section 18 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 57a, 15 U.S.C. § 8404(a), and therefore constitute an unfair or deceptive act or practice in violation of Section 5(a) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(a).


263. Defendant committed the violations set forth in Paragraph 261 with the knowledge required by Section 5(m)(1)(A) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(m)(1)(A).



Continue Reading Here.


About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.


This court case 2:23-cv-00932 retrieved on September 28, 2023, from ftc.gov is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.